Value Assessment for Inland Wetlands according to Ecological Geographic Distribution
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korea established an inventory of 1,916 sites of inland wetlands during a nationwide investigation from 2000 to 2010. If inland wetlands is included in or near various protected areas designated by the government, it can be selected as a wetland to be managed with priority. This study evaluated the aspect of management of inland wetlands by analyzing the correlation between locations of national protected areas and inland wetlands. As a result, it was shown that a considerable percentage of current inland wetland was located in areas that were designated and managed as protected areas by the government, as they had a high value of natural environment protection (527 sites, 31.61 %). When the range was widened to a radius of 1 km for protected areas, 959 sites were included and 57.53 % of sites were located in or nearby the protected areas. Among them, 46.79 % of sites were distributed up to or within a 1 km radius of waterside areas and rivers; it accounted for 81.33 % of wetlands located in protected areas. Therefore, it was found that locations of current inland wetlands were mostly in contact with rivers. The results of overlay analysis were classified into high, medium and low; the correlation of location with inland wetlands was analyzed through the analysis of separation distance of various protected areas. The number of wetlands located in areas of a ‘high’ value of protection was 998 (59.87 %); 289 sites (17.34 %) were distributed in areas of a ‘low’ value of protection. This implies that these wetlands are located in artificial areas and are more exposed to environmental pressures. Thus, these wetlands could be determined as inland wetlands, which we considered for the establishment of measures to prevent damage.
Abstract
Korea established an inventory of 1,916 sites of inland wetlands during a nationwide investigation from 2000 to 2010. If inland wetlands is included in or near various protected areas designated by the government, it can be selected as a wetland to be managed with priority. This study evaluated the aspect of management of inland wetlands by analyzing the correlation between locations of national protected areas and inland wetlands. As a result, it was shown that a considerable percentage of current inland wetland was located in areas that were designated and managed as protected areas by the government, as they had a high value of natural environment protection (527 sites, 31.61 %). When the range was widened to a radius of 1 km for protected areas, 959 sites were included and 57.53 % of sites were located in or nearby the protected areas. Among them, 46.79 % of sites were distributed up to or within a 1 km radius of waterside areas and rivers; it accounted for 81.33 % of wetlands located in protected areas. Therefore, it was found that locations of current inland wetlands were mostly in contact with rivers. The results of overlay analysis were classified into high, medium and low; the correlation of location with inland wetlands was analyzed through the analysis of separation distance of various protected areas. The number of wetlands located in areas of a ‘high’ value of protection was 998 (59.87 %); 289 sites (17.34 %) were distributed in areas of a ‘low’ value of protection. This implies that these wetlands are located in artificial areas and are more exposed to environmental pressures. Thus, these wetlands could be determined as inland wetlands, which we considered for the establishment of measures to prevent damage.
참고문헌 (15)
- Banai, R, "Fuzziness in geographical information systems: contributions from the analytic hierarchy process", International J. of Geographical Information Systems, 7(4), pp.315~329 (1993)
- Cowardin, LM, "Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States", US Fish and Wildlife Service FWS, 1979, pp.79(31), 131~
- Cylinder, PD, "Wetlands Regulation: A Complete Guide to Federal and California Programs" (1995), Solano Press Books
- Graymore MLM, "An index of regional sustainability: A GIS-based multiple criteria analysis decision support system for progressing sustainability", Ecological Complexity, 6(4), pp.453~462 (2009)
- 김태성, "습지보전 ‧ 관리를 위한 국가 중장기 계획 소개", 한국습지학회지, 15(4), pp.519~527 (2013), 한국습지학회
- 이관규, "야생동·식물보호구역 분포 특성과 개선과제", 환경영향평가, 20(5), pp.685~695 (2011), 한국환경영향평가학회
- The 3rd Inland Wetlands Investigation Guidelines Research, "Mistry of Environment", ~ (2011)
- Mistry of Environment, "The Current Situation of registration of wetland conservation area and ramsar wetland (2012.12)", ~ (2013)
- Mitsch, WJ, "Wetlands" (1993), Wiley
- Mitsch, WJ, "The value of wetlands : importance of scale and landscape setting", Ecological Economics, 35(1), pp.25~33 (2000)
- National Wetlands Center, "The 1st Inland Wetlands Monitoring Guidelines", ~ (2013)
- Neter, J, "Applied Linear Statistical Models" (1996), Irwin
- Neter, J, "Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs" (1990), Irwin
- Vladimir, S, "Local quantile regression", J. of Statistical Planning and Inference, 143(7), pp.1109~1129 (2013)
- 유주한, "퍼지적분을 도입한 생태환경평가부문의 순위결정", 한국조경학회지, 34(5), pp.39~51 (2006), 한국조경학회
