연속근사모형(SAM)을 기반으로 한 사례연구(Case Study) 활용 기업교육 프로그램 개발 : A사 시장조사 직무 교육과정을 중심으로
Development of a Corporate Training Program using Case Study based on Successive Approximation Model: focusing on the Market Research Training Course of Company A
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구는 교육 설계에 대한 혁신적인 접근법으로서 반복적이고 유연하며 협력적인 방법론을 강조하는 연속근사모형(SAM)을 기업교육의 맥락에서 통합하는 방법을 고찰한다. 기존의 선형적이고 체계적인 모델과 달리, SAM은 현대 기업 환경의빠른 변화와 복잡한 요구사항을 해결하는 역동적인 개발 틀을 제공한다. A사 특정직무교육 사례를 통해, SAM을 적용하여 준비, 반복적 설계, 반복적 개발 단계를 거치면서 지속적인 개선과 이해관계자 참여를 촉진하는 특징을 고찰한다. 학습자, 강사, 내용전문가 등 다양한 이해관계자의 결과와 피드백을 분석하여, SAM의 반복적특성이 교육 내용의 관련성과 효과를 높이고 협업과 적응력을 촉진하는 문화를 조성하는 방법을 보여준다. 또한, 광범위한 협업의 필요성, 프로젝트 비효율성 가능성등 SAM 적용 과정에서 직면하는 문제와 이를 전략적 계획과 파일럿테스트를 통해완화할 수 있는 방법에 대해 논의한다. 이 연구는 SAM을 효과적으로 활용하여 학습 경험과 성과를 향상시키는 실질적인 통찰력을 제공함으로써 HRD 연구에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.
Abstract
This study explores the integration of the Successive Approximation Model (SAM), which emphasizes an iterative, flexible, and collaborative methodology as an innovative approach to instructional design in the context of corporate education. Unlike traditional linear and systematic models, SAM provides a dynamic development framework that addresses the rapid changes and complex needs of the modern corporate environment. Using the case of Company A's specific job training, the study examines the application of SAM through the stages of preparation, iterative design, and iterative development, focusing on its features that promote continuous improvement and stakeholder engagement. By analyzing the outcomes and feedback from various stakeholders, including learners, trainers, and subject matter experts, this study demonstrates how the iterative nature of SAM enhances the relevance and effectiveness of training content and fosters a culture of collaboration and adaptability. It also discusses the challenges faced in applying SAM, such as the need for extensive collaboration and the potential for project inefficiencies, and how these can be mitigated through strategic planning and piloting. The study contributes to HRD research by providing practical insights into how SAM can be effectively utilized to enhance learning experiences and outcomes.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김정아, "사례기반학습의 적용에 따른 간호대학생의 문제해결력, 내적 동기와 수업만족도의 차이", 교육방법연구, 27(1), pp.21~37 (2015)
- 임철일, "사례기반 시뮬레이션 설계 원리에 관한 형성 연구", 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 25(2), pp.117~149 (2009)
- Ali, C. A., "A Comparative Study of SAM and ADDIE Models in Simulating STEM Instruction", African Educational Research Journal, 9(4), pp.852~859 (2021)
- Alessi, S. M., "Computer-Based Instruction: Methods and Development" (1991), Prentice-Hall
- Allen, M., "Leaving ADDIE for SAM: An Agile Model for Developing the Best Learning Experiences" (2012), ASTD Press
- Al-Momen, R. K., "Applying the ADDIE—Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation—Instructional Design Model to Continuing Professional Development for Primary Care Physicians in Saudi Arabia", International Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 7(8), pp.538~546 (2016)
- Brethower, D. M., "Instructional Development Paradigms", pp.221~236 (1998), Educational Technology Publications
- Brown, T. M., "Handbook of Research on Adult Learning in Higher Education", pp.265~287 (2020)
- Brown, J. S., "Situated cognition and the culture of learning", Educational Researcher, 18(1), pp.32~42 (1989)
- Dick, W., "The Systematic Design of Instruction" (2015), Pearson
- Dooley, K. E., "Advanced methods in distance education: Applications and practices for educators, administrators and learners:Applications and practices for educators, administrators and learners" (2005), IGI Global
- Essel, B. H., "Adopting Successive Approximation Model For The Development Of Locally-Made Interventionary Manipulatives For The Teaching Ang Learning Of Mathematics In Basic Education Context : The Case Of Akrom M", A And Knust Primary Schools, 2016, pp.3, 1~22
- Essel, H. B., "A comparative study of SAM and ADDIE models in simulating STEM instruction", African Educational Research Journal, 4(3), pp.129~136 (2016)
- Frerejean, J., "Critical design choices in healthcare simulation education : a 4C", ID perspective on design that leads to transfer, 2023, pp.8(1), 5~
- Göksu, I., "Content analysis of research trends in instructional design models : 1999-2014", Journal of Learning Design, 10(2), pp.85~109 (2017)
- Gustafson, K. L., "Survey of Instructional Development Models" (1997), Syracuse University
- Jochems, W., "Integrated e-learning. Implications for pedagogy, technology & organization" (2004), Londres
- Jones, T. S., "Rapid prototyping in action : A developmental study", Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), pp.63~80 (2000)
- Mehran, P., "Designing and developing a blended course : Toward best practices for Japanese learners", Proceedings of the European Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning(EUROCALL 2017), pp.714~ (2017)
- Piskurich, G. M., "Rapid Instructional Design: Learning ID fast and right" (2015), John Wiley & Sons
- Robinson, D. G., "New Directions for Teaching and Learning", pp.77~92 (1989), Jossey-Bass
- Sites, R., "Leaving ADDIE for SAM field guide: Guidelines and templates for developing the best learning experiences", Association for Talent Development, ~ (2014)
- Schmidt, M., "Formative design and evaluation of a responsive eHealth", mHealth intervention for positive family adaptation following pediatric traumatic brain injury, 2020, pp.4, 88~106
- Spatioti, A., "A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education", Information, 13(9), pp.402~ (2022)
- Tamez, R., "Theoretical Frameworks of Performance-Based Models", Performance Improvement, 55(6), pp.19~24 (2016)
- Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., "Research on instructional design and the 4C", ID model, 2015, ~
- Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., "Integrated e-learning: Implications for pedagogy, technology and organization" (2003), Open University Press
- Wintarti, A., "The instructional design of blended learning on differential calculus using successive approximation model", Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 1417(1), pp.012064~, IOP Publishing