본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

A Study on Trend and Characteristics of Industrial SECURITY Regulatory Legislation in KOREA

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Korea has seen a constant increase in highly sophisticated, intelligent, and advanced industrial spying crimes, such as leakage of state-of-art technologies, infringement upon intellectual properties, etc., as industrial technology competitiveness is strengthening. State-led control is being pushed forward at policy level to prevent such industrial spying crimes. For that, legal grounds need to be clarified for authority, mechanism, and obligations of competent government ministries as the leader of industrial security protection at national level. Currently, laws have already been enacted to control industrial technology leakage, infringement of business secret and others in Korea. This study was intended to examine trends of regulatory legislation related to industrial security, such as leakage of industrial technologies and infringement upon business secrets, in Korea and to discuss implications associated with industrial security policies and system nationwide by identifying characteristics of regulatory legislation on industrial security. In Korea, regulatory laws pertaining to industrial security is legalized with separate laws such as ‘Act on Prevention of Leakage and Protection of Industrial Technology’, ‘Act on Prevention of Unfair Competition and Protection of Business Secret’, ‘Act on Protection of Small Medium Company’s Technology, etc. Thus, applicable laws may vary, depending on cases. Moreover, laws need to be applied based on individual statutes under the status of special laws and interpretation needed to be made in consideration of complementary application of statutes as general laws. Regulatory legislation on industrial security in Korea involves appointment of concerned management and supervision organizations, along with clarification of responsibilities of state and government for industrial security despite different entities covered by individual laws. Private corporate business secrets, as well as nation’s key technologies, are protected, controlled, and supported under the leadership of state. Industrial security system in Korea emphasizes punishment for leakage and infringement which are components of specific crimes, with management and supervision from the standpoint of ex post facto response to leakage of technologies and infringement upon secrets based on government policies. However, it is more important to create an environment conducive to prevention of such leakage and infringement in the realm of private sector, particularly for small and medium companies. That calls for specialization related to industrial security mechanism. Therefore, it should be considered to develop professional manpower with concerned expertise and implementation capabilities and to introduce national certification system necessary for increasing related public confidence.

Abstract

Korea has seen a constant increase in highly sophisticated, intelligent, and advanced industrial spying crimes, such as leakage of state-of-art technologies, infringement upon intellectual properties, etc., as industrial technology competitiveness is strengthening. State-led control is being pushed forward at policy level to prevent such industrial spying crimes. For that, legal grounds need to be clarified for authority, mechanism, and obligations of competent government ministries as the leader of industrial security protection at national level. Currently, laws have already been enacted to control industrial technology leakage, infringement of business secret and others in Korea. This study was intended to examine trends of regulatory legislation related to industrial security, such as leakage of industrial technologies and infringement upon business secrets, in Korea and to discuss implications associated with industrial security policies and system nationwide by identifying characteristics of regulatory legislation on industrial security. In Korea, regulatory laws pertaining to industrial security is legalized with separate laws such as ‘Act on Prevention of Leakage and Protection of Industrial Technology’, ‘Act on Prevention of Unfair Competition and Protection of Business Secret’, ‘Act on Protection of Small Medium Company’s Technology, etc. Thus, applicable laws may vary, depending on cases. Moreover, laws need to be applied based on individual statutes under the status of special laws and interpretation needed to be made in consideration of complementary application of statutes as general laws. Regulatory legislation on industrial security in Korea involves appointment of concerned management and supervision organizations, along with clarification of responsibilities of state and government for industrial security despite different entities covered by individual laws. Private corporate business secrets, as well as nation’s key technologies, are protected, controlled, and supported under the leadership of state. Industrial security system in Korea emphasizes punishment for leakage and infringement which are components of specific crimes, with management and supervision from the standpoint of ex post facto response to leakage of technologies and infringement upon secrets based on government policies. However, it is more important to create an environment conducive to prevention of such leakage and infringement in the realm of private sector, particularly for small and medium companies. That calls for specialization related to industrial security mechanism. Therefore, it should be considered to develop professional manpower with concerned expertise and implementation capabilities and to introduce national certification system necessary for increasing related public confidence.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 이민형, "관리적 보안활동과 보안인력 전문성이 기술유출방지에 미치는 영향", 한국치안행정논집, 12(2), pp.165~182 (2015), 한국치안행정학회[DOI]
  2. 이민형, "지역 중소기업의 성장동력 활성화 방안 -산업보안을 중심으로-", 한국지방자치연구, 15(2), pp.141~159 (2013), 대한지방자치학회
  3. 이창무, "산업기술보호정책의 법제화 과정 분석: 역사적 신제도주의 관점", 정책분석평가학회보, 25(4), pp.293~310 (2015), 한국정책분석평가학회[DOI]
  4. "Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protec-tion of Industrial Technology Article 3 Re-sponsibility and Duty of State etc", ~ (2016)
  5. "Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protec-tion of Industrial Technology Article 11 Para-graph 1 and 2 of Article 11", ~ (2016)
  6. "Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protec-tion of Industrial Technology Article 14", ~ (2016)
  7. "Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protec-tion of Industrial Technology Article 14", ~ (2016)
  8. "Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protec-tion of Industrial Technology Article 36", ~ (2016)
  9. "Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act Article 9", ~ (2016)
  10. "Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act Article 10", ~ (2016)
  11. "Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act Article 18 Paragraph 1 and 2", ~ (2016)
  12. "Act on the Protection Small Business Tech-nical Support Article 3", ~ (2016)
  13. "Act on the Protection Small Business Tech-nical Support Article 14", ~ (2016)
  14. "Act on the Protection Small Business Tech-nical Support Article 35", ~ (2016)
  15. "Act on the Protection Small Business Tech-nical Support Article 33", ~ (2016)
  16. "Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Pro-tection of Industrial Technology Article 4", ~ (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)