본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Status Seeking through Social Creativity Has Its Limits: South Korea and the Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정치외교학

초록

The paper uses social identity theory to assess South Korea’s lack of membership in the Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform, a group of small states advocating for the global elimination of fossil-fuel subsidies. This paper asks whether South Korea would be a complement to the Friends group and whether joining the group would boost Korea’s international profile and middle power status. It subsequently tries to explain why Korea has yet to join the group. After a short introduction, the paper provides a general explanation of the need for fossil fuel subsidy reform. Section three introduces the concept of social creativity and argues that South Korea is embracing status-seeking behavior. Section four presents the Friends group and assesses South Korea as a complement to that group. Section five looks at the international prospects of subsidy reform from an institutional perspective and asks whether the Friends group or South Korea can potentially influence movement in subsidy reform. Section six argues that although South Korea seems an ideal fit to join the Friends group, South Korea has not joined for a number of reasons, including domestic economic constraints, considerations in bilateral relations and Korean preferences for certain institutional structures. Lastly, the paper concludes that status-seeking behavior has its limits, and although the Friends group would add little benefit to South Korea’s international profile, South Korea’s lack of membership in the group is a missed opportunity to further subsidy reform.

Abstract

The paper uses social identity theory to assess South Korea’s lack of membership in the Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform, a group of small states advocating for the global elimination of fossil-fuel subsidies. This paper asks whether South Korea would be a complement to the Friends group and whether joining the group would boost Korea’s international profile and middle power status. It subsequently tries to explain why Korea has yet to join the group. After a short introduction, the paper provides a general explanation of the need for fossil fuel subsidy reform. Section three introduces the concept of social creativity and argues that South Korea is embracing status-seeking behavior. Section four presents the Friends group and assesses South Korea as a complement to that group. Section five looks at the international prospects of subsidy reform from an institutional perspective and asks whether the Friends group or South Korea can potentially influence movement in subsidy reform. Section six argues that although South Korea seems an ideal fit to join the Friends group, South Korea has not joined for a number of reasons, including domestic economic constraints, considerations in bilateral relations and Korean preferences for certain institutional structures. Lastly, the paper concludes that status-seeking behavior has its limits, and although the Friends group would add little benefit to South Korea’s international profile, South Korea’s lack of membership in the group is a missed opportunity to further subsidy reform.

참고문헌 (63)

  1. Reducing fossil-fuel subsidies to reduce waste and limit CO2 emissions while protecting the poor, "Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation", APEC Energy Working Group, ~, pp.APEC Project EWG11 (2012), 2010
  2. "Sustaining growth, connecting the region"[URL]
  3. Chapnick, Adam, "The middle power", Canadian Foreign Policy, 7(2) (1999)
  4. "Laying a foundation for peaceful unification"[URL]
  5. Cheong Wa Dae, "Global Korea: The national security strategy of the Republic of Korea", ~ (2009)
  6. Clunan, Anne L., "Status and World Politics" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  7. Cooper, Andrew F, "Relocating Middle Powers:Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order" (1993), UBC Press
  8. Cotton, James, "Interview with Lim Suk Jun, Let’s Talk Busan, Busan E-fm 90.5", ~ (2013)
  9. "Norway takes aim at G20: One of the greatest setbacks since World War II" (2010)[URL]
  10. "Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform: Ethiopia became comrades in arms with the “Friends" (2011)[URL]
  11. Gerasmichuk, Ivetta and Natalia Zamudio, "Following the money: fossil fuel subsidy reform en route from Durban to Rio+20" (2012), The International Institute for Sustainable Development
  12. "Countries ranked by military strength (2014)" (2014)[URL]
  13. "Green Climate Fund trust fund financial report—status as of 31December 2013" (2014)[URL]
  14. International Energy Agency, "World Energy Outlook 2010", pp.2010, OECD
  15. International Energy Agency, "World Energy Outlook 2011", pp.2011, Paris : OECD
  16. International Energy Agency, "Energy Policies of IEA Countries: The Republic of Korea, 2012Review", pp.2012, Paris : OECD
  17. International Energy Agency, "Analysis of the scope of energy subsidies and suggestions for the G-20 initiative", Prepared for Submission to the G-20 Summit Meeting, Toronto, Canada, (26-27 June 2010) (2010), IEA, OPEC, OECD, World Bank Joint Report
  18. International Monetary Fund, "Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications" (2013), IMF
  19. "Joint Statement on the Establishment of a Green Growth Alliance between the Government of the Republic of Korea and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark", ~ (2011)
  20. Korea's green growth strategy: Mitigating climate change and developing new growth engines, "Jones, Randall. S.", OECD Publishing, ~, pp.OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 798 (2011)
  21. "Korea, Australia reach deal on free trade agreement" (2013)[URL]
  22. "Progress elusive in 10th FTA talks with China" (2014)[URL]
  23. Global Korea: Broadening Korea’s diplomatic horizons, "Kim, Sung Han", Center for Strategic and International Studies, Office of the Korea Chair, ~ (2012)
  24. "Friends of the Chair, or the Chair’s (true) friends? The art of negotiation in the Rio process and climate negotiations" (2010)[URL]
  25. Ko, Sang Tu, "Korea’s middle power activism and peacekeeping operations", Asia Europe Journal, 10 (2012)
  26. Lake, David, "Status and World Politics" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  27. Lang, Kerryn, "Increasing the momentum of fossil-fuel subsidy reform: A roadmap for international cooperation" (2010), International Institute for Sustainable Development
  28. Larson, Deborah Welch, "Status and World Politics" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  29. Larson, Deborah Welch, "Status and World Politics" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  30. "Amendments to EU FTA still await approval" (2011)[URL]
  31. "New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade"[URL]
  32. "Korea: Inventory of estimated budgetary support and tax expenditures for fossil fuels"[URL]
  33. "Denmark: Inventory of estimated budgetary support and tax expenditures for fossil fuels"[URL]
  34. "Finland: Inventory of estimated budgetary support and tax expenditures for fossil fuels"[URL]
  35. "New Zealand: Inventory of estimated budgetary support and tax expenditures for fossil fuels"[URL]
  36. "Norway: Inventory of estimated budgetary support and tax expenditures for fossil fuels"[URL]
  37. "Sweden: Inventory of estimated budgetary support and tax expenditures for fossil fuels"[URL]
  38. "Switzerland: Inventory of estimated budgetary support and tax expenditures for fossil fuels"[URL]
  39. Paul, T.V., "Status and World Politics" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  40. "Fisheries subsidies in Costa Rica"[URL]
  41. "Deep-seated economic ties bind Korea, United States" (2013)[URL]
  42. "South Korea holds 23 Chinese for illegal fishing" (2012)[URL]
  43. Subsidy Watch, "International political developments and the role of the “Friends” group in progressing subsidy reform", GSI, 2010, ~
  44. "Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform’ roundtable for G20 countries on recent progress and peer-review of fossil-fuel subsidy reform" (2013)[URL]
  45. "CO2 emissions (kt)"[URL]
  46. "Energy imports, net (% of energy use)" (2011)[URL]
  47. "Energy use (kt of oil equivalent)" (2011)[URL]
  48. "Fossil fuel energy consumption (% of total)" (2011)[URL]
  49. "GDP ranking" (2014)[URL]
  50. "GNI per capita, Atlas method, (current US$)" (2014)[URL]
  51. "Population (total)"[URL]
  52. "“Concluding remarks by the chairperson,” Trade Policy Review:Singapore" (2012)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)