본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Family Functioning and Communication in Spouses of Patients with Parkinsonism

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류가정의학

초록

Background: Patients with parkinsonism exhibit motor symptoms, cognitive impairment, and neuropsychiatric changes, and these symptoms increase caregiver burden. Family dynamics can be influenced by the presence of comorbidities, which is especially important in diseases causing caregiver burden. We investigated the effects of spousal parkinsonism on family functioning and communication.Methods: Couples without parkinsonism, who visited hospital-based family practices, were recruited by 28 family physicians from 22 hospitals between April 2009 and June 2011; patients with parkinsonism and their spouses were recruited from a single institution. The participants completed questionnaires on demographic characteristics, life-style factors, family functioning (the Korean version of the Family Adaptation and Cohesion Evaluation Scale [FAC-ES] III), and family communication (the Family Communication Scale of the FACES-IV). We compared family functioning and communication between spouses of the patients with and without parkinsonism.Results: The mean family adaptability and cohesion scores of the spouses of the patients with parkinsonism were 23.09±6.48 and 32.40±8.43, respectively, whereas those of the control group were 23.84±5.88 and 34.89±7.59, re-spectively. Family functioning and family communication were significantly different between the spouses of indi-viduals with and without parkinsonism. After adjusting for age, sex, income, and cardiovascular disease in the lo-gistic regression analysis, family functioning was found to significantly deteriorate in the spouses of patients with parkinsonism but not the control group. Family communication decreased significantly in spouses of patients with parkinsonism.Conclusion: Family functioning and family communication significantly deteriorated in spouses of patients with parkinsonism.

Abstract

Background: Patients with parkinsonism exhibit motor symptoms, cognitive impairment, and neuropsychiatric changes, and these symptoms increase caregiver burden. Family dynamics can be influenced by the presence of comorbidities, which is especially important in diseases causing caregiver burden. We investigated the effects of spousal parkinsonism on family functioning and communication.Methods: Couples without parkinsonism, who visited hospital-based family practices, were recruited by 28 family physicians from 22 hospitals between April 2009 and June 2011; patients with parkinsonism and their spouses were recruited from a single institution. The participants completed questionnaires on demographic characteristics, life-style factors, family functioning (the Korean version of the Family Adaptation and Cohesion Evaluation Scale [FAC-ES] III), and family communication (the Family Communication Scale of the FACES-IV). We compared family functioning and communication between spouses of the patients with and without parkinsonism.Results: The mean family adaptability and cohesion scores of the spouses of the patients with parkinsonism were 23.09±6.48 and 32.40±8.43, respectively, whereas those of the control group were 23.84±5.88 and 34.89±7.59, re-spectively. Family functioning and family communication were significantly different between the spouses of indi-viduals with and without parkinsonism. After adjusting for age, sex, income, and cardiovascular disease in the lo-gistic regression analysis, family functioning was found to significantly deteriorate in the spouses of patients with parkinsonism but not the control group. Family communication decreased significantly in spouses of patients with parkinsonism.Conclusion: Family functioning and family communication significantly deteriorated in spouses of patients with parkinsonism.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Postuma RB, "MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease", Mov Disord, 30, pp.1591~1601 (2015)
  2. Christine CW, "Clinical differentiation of parkinsonian syndromes : prognostic and therapeutic relevance", Am J Med, 117, pp.412~419 (2004)
  3. De Rijk MC, "European Community Concerted Action on the Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 62, pp.10~15 (1997)
  4. Kim JM, "Study of the prevalence of Parkinson’s disease using dopamine transporter imaging", Neurol Res, 32, pp.845~851 (2010)
  5. Beitz JM, "Parkinson’s disease : a review", Front Biosci (Schol Ed), 6, pp.65~74 (2014)
  6. Findley LJ, "The economic impact of Parkinson’s disease", Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 13(Suppl), pp.S8~S12 (2007)
  7. Martinez-Martin P, "Neuropsychiatric symptoms and caregiver’s burden in Parkinson’s disease", Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 21, pp.629~634 (2015)
  8. Panyavin I, "Examining the influence of family dynamics on quality of care by informal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s dementia in Argentina", Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 30, pp.613~621 (2015)
  9. Sutter M, "Linking family dynamics and the mental health of Colombian dementia caregivers", Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 29, pp.67~75 (2014)
  10. Tatsumi H, "Relationships among communication self-efficacy, communication burden, and the mental health of the families of persons with aphasia", J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 25, pp.197~205 (2016)
  11. Nicoletti A, "Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder in drug-naive Parkinson’s disease patients", J Neurol, 262, pp.485~486 (2015)
  12. Wee N, "Depression and anxiety are co-morbid but dissociable in mild Parkinson’s disease : a prospective longitudinal study of patterns and predictors", Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 23, pp.50~56 (2016)
  13. Olson DH, "Family assessment and intervention : the circumplex model of family systems", Child Youth Serv, 11, pp.9~48 (1989)
  14. Place M, "The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES): an instrument worthy of rehabilitation?", Psychiatrist, 29, pp.215~218 (2005)
  15. Franklin C, "Validity of the FACES IV family assessment measure", Res Soc Work Pract, 11, pp.576~596 (2001)
  16. Du N, "Comparison of family functioning in families of depressed patients and nonclinical control families in China using the Family Assessment Device and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales II", Ann Clin Psychiatry, 26, pp.47~56 (2014)
  17. Hyuk Ju Kwon, "The Relationship between a Spouse’s Alcohol Use Disorder and Family Communication", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 36(2), pp.92~102 (2015), 대한가정의학회
  18. "Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ): short and long forms" (2005)[URL]
  19. World Health Organization, International Association for the Study of Obesity, International Obesity Task Force, "The Asia-Pacific perspective:redefining obesity and its treatment" (2000), Health Communications
  20. Lee SY, "Appropriate waist circumference cutoff points for central obesity in Korean adults", Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 75, pp.72~80 (2007)
  21. Lim JH, "A study of reliability and validity of FACES III", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 11, pp.8~17 (1990)
  22. 김영식, "FACES IV의 가족의사소통 척도(FCS) 한국어판의 신뢰도 및 타당도 분석", 한국가족관계학회지, 17(1), pp.241~258 (2012), 한국가족관계학회
  23. Rashid M, "The impact of pediatric traumatic brain injury(TBI)on family functioning : a systematic review", J Pediatr Rehabil Med, 7, pp.241~254 (2014)
  24. Wiguna T, "Family responses to a child with schizophrenia : An Indonesian experience", Asian J Psychiatr, 18, pp.66~69 (2015)
  25. Carlsson E, "Communicative strategies used by spouses of individuals with communication disorders related to stroke-induced aphasia and Parkinson’s disease", Int J Lang Commun Disord, 49, pp.722~735 (2014)
  26. Tramonti F, "A permanent emergency : a longitudinal study on families coping with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis", Fam Syst Health, 32, pp.271~279 (2014)
  27. Santos-Garcia D, "Factors contributing to caregivers’ stress and burden in Parkinson’s disease", Acta Neurol Scand, 131, pp.203~210 (2015)
  28. Henggeler SW, "Use of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales in child clinical research", J Abnorm Child Psychol, 19, pp.53~63 (1991)
  29. Finzi-Dottan R, "The druguser husband and his wife: attachment styles, family cohesion, and adaptability", Subst Use Misuse, 38, pp.271~292 (2003)
  30. Hamilton E, Carr A, "Systematic review of self-report family assessment measures", Fam Process, 55, pp.16~30 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)