22-gauge Co-Cr versus stainless-steel Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients with solid pancreatic lesions
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) using Franseen needles is reportedly useful for its high diagnostic yield. This study compared the diagnostic yield and puncturing ability of EUS-TA using 22-gauge cobalt-chromium (CO-Cr) needles with those of stainless-steel Franseen needles in patients with solid pancreatic lesions. Methods: Outcomes were compared between the 22-gauge Co-Cr Franseen needle (December 2019 to November 2020; group C) and stainless-steel needle (November 2020 to May 2022; group S). Results: A total of 155 patients (group C, 75; group S, 80) were eligible. The diagnostic accuracy was 92.0% in group C and 96.3% in group S with no significant intergroup differences (p=0.32). The rate of change in the operator (from training fellows to experts) was 20.0% (15/75) in group C and 7.5% (6/80) in group S. Stainless-steel Franseen needles showed less inter-operator difference than Co-Cr needles (p=0.03). Conclusions: Both Co-Cr and stainless-steel Franseen needles showed high diagnostic ability. Stainless-steel Franseen needles are soft and flexible; therefore, the range of puncture angles can be widely adjusted, making them suitable for training fellows to complete the procedure.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) using Franseen needles is reportedly useful for its high diagnostic yield. This study compared the diagnostic yield and puncturing ability of EUS-TA using 22-gauge cobalt-chromium (CO-Cr) needles with those of stainless-steel Franseen needles in patients with solid pancreatic lesions. Methods: Outcomes were compared between the 22-gauge Co-Cr Franseen needle (December 2019 to November 2020; group C) and stainless-steel needle (November 2020 to May 2022; group S). Results: A total of 155 patients (group C, 75; group S, 80) were eligible. The diagnostic accuracy was 92.0% in group C and 96.3% in group S with no significant intergroup differences (p=0.32). The rate of change in the operator (from training fellows to experts) was 20.0% (15/75) in group C and 7.5% (6/80) in group S. Stainless-steel Franseen needles showed less inter-operator difference than Co-Cr needles (p=0.03). Conclusions: Both Co-Cr and stainless-steel Franseen needles showed high diagnostic ability. Stainless-steel Franseen needles are soft and flexible; therefore, the range of puncture angles can be widely adjusted, making them suitable for training fellows to complete the procedure.
참고문헌 (22)
- Iglesias-Garcia J, "Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(EUS-FNA)of solid pancreatic masses", Am J Gastroenterol, 106, pp.1705~1710 (2011)
- Vilmann P, "Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses", Scand J Gastroenterol, 48, pp.877~883 (2013)
- Puli SR, "How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass? : a meta-analysis and systematic review", Pancreas, 42, pp.20~26 (2013)
- Iwashita T, "Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10, pp.316~322 (2012)
- Bang JY, "Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions", Gastrointest Endosc, 76, pp.321~327 (2012)
- Iwashita T, "High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions", Gastrointest Endosc, 77, pp.909~915 (2013)
- Fujita A, "Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for preoperative pancreatic solid lesions", Scand J Gastroenterol, 56, pp.188~192 (2021)
- Tanisaka Y, "Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy device for lymphadenopathy", Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2021, pp.6640862~ (2021)
- Itonaga M, "Comparison of 22-gauge standard and Franseen needles in EUS-guided tissue acquisition for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions : a multicenter randomized controlled trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 96, pp.57~66 (2022)
- Kandel P, "Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer : a randomized crossover trial", Endoscopy, 53, pp.376~382 (2021)
- Ikeda G, "Fine-needle biopsy with 19G needle is effective in combination with endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for genomic profiling of unresectable pancreatic cancer", Dig Endosc, 35, pp.124~133 (2023)
- Bang JY, "Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design : initial assessment", Dig Endosc, 29, pp.338~346 (2017)
- Mukai S, "A retrospective histological comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a novel franseenneedle and a conventional end-cut type needle", Endosc Ultrasound, 8, pp.50~57 (2019)
- Kurita A, "Comparison of a 22-gauge Franseen-tip needle with a 20-gauge forward-bevel needle for the diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis : a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study(COMPAS study)", Gastrointest Endosc, 91, pp.373~381 (2020)
- Ishigaki K, "A prospective multicenter study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using a 22-gauge Franseen needle for pancreatic solid lesions", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 36, pp.2754~2761 (2021)
- Nakai Y, "Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses", Dig Dis Sci, 59, pp.1578~1585 (2014)
- Saxena P, "Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions : a multicenter randomized trial", Endoscopy, 50, pp.497~504 (2018)
- Bor R, "Slow-pull technique yields better quality smears : prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration", Scand J Gastroenterol, 55, pp.1369~1376 (2020)
- Matynia AP, "Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on the adequacy of endoscopic-ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 29, pp.697~705 (2014)
- Kouanda A, "Telecytology versus in-room cytopathologist for EUS-guided FNA or fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic lesions", Gastrointest Endosc, 97, pp.466~471 (2023)
- Cotton PB, "A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events : report of an ASGE workshop", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.446~454 (2010)
- Bang JY, "Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions", Gastrointest Endosc, 87, pp.1432~1438 (2018)