Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition by 22-Gauge Franseen and Standard Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Recently, a three-plane symmetric needle with Franseen geometry was developed for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). In this retrospective study, tissue acquisition per pass was compared between 22-gauge Franseen FNB and standard fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles in patients with solid pancreatic lesions. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUSFNA or EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic lesions between October 2014 and March 2018 were retrospectively studied. The tissue acquisition rate and the diagnostic performance per session, per pass, and at first pass were compared. Results: A total of 663 passes (300 by the FNB needle and 363 by the standard FNA needle) were performed in 154 patients (71 FNB and 83 FNA). The tissue acquisition rate per session and at first pass in the FNB and FNA groups was 100% and 95% (p=0.13) and 87% and 69% (p=0.007), respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that among the patients, EUS-FNB (odds ratio, 3.07; p=0.01) was associated with a higher first-pass tissue acquisition rate. While the tissue acquisition rate reached a plateau after the 4th pass with FNA, it reached a plateau after the 2nd pass with FNB. Among the 129 malignant cases, the histological tissue acquisition rate per session was similar (100% and 94%), but the sensitivity by histology alone per session was higher for FNB than for FNA (93% and 73%, p<0.01). Conclusions: The results of our retrospective analysis indicated that compared with a standard FNA needle, a 22-gauge Franseen FNB needle was associated with a higher first-pass tissue acquisition rate.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Recently, a three-plane symmetric needle with Franseen geometry was developed for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). In this retrospective study, tissue acquisition per pass was compared between 22-gauge Franseen FNB and standard fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles in patients with solid pancreatic lesions. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUSFNA or EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic lesions between October 2014 and March 2018 were retrospectively studied. The tissue acquisition rate and the diagnostic performance per session, per pass, and at first pass were compared. Results: A total of 663 passes (300 by the FNB needle and 363 by the standard FNA needle) were performed in 154 patients (71 FNB and 83 FNA). The tissue acquisition rate per session and at first pass in the FNB and FNA groups was 100% and 95% (p=0.13) and 87% and 69% (p=0.007), respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that among the patients, EUS-FNB (odds ratio, 3.07; p=0.01) was associated with a higher first-pass tissue acquisition rate. While the tissue acquisition rate reached a plateau after the 4th pass with FNA, it reached a plateau after the 2nd pass with FNB. Among the 129 malignant cases, the histological tissue acquisition rate per session was similar (100% and 94%), but the sensitivity by histology alone per session was higher for FNB than for FNA (93% and 73%, p<0.01). Conclusions: The results of our retrospective analysis indicated that compared with a standard FNA needle, a 22-gauge Franseen FNB needle was associated with a higher first-pass tissue acquisition rate.
참고문헌 (34)
- Hewitt MJ, "EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms : a meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.319~331 (2012)
- Puli SR, "How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass? A metaanalysis and systematic review", Pancreas, 42, pp.20~26 (2013)
- Eltoum IA, "Trends in pancreatic pathology practice before and after implementation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration : an example of disruptive innovation effect", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 136, pp.447~453 (2012)
- Iglesias-Garcia J, "Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle : results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.1189~1196 (2011)
- Iwashita T, "High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUSguided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions", Gastrointest Endosc, 77, pp.909~915 (2013)
- Larghi A, "Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses : a multicenter prospective cohort study", Surg Endosc, 27, pp.3733~3738 (2013)
- Bang JY, "A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition", Endoscopy, 48, pp.339~349 (2016)
- Chong CCN, "EUS-FNA using 22G nitinol or ProCore needles without on-site cytopathology", Endosc Ultrasound, 7, pp.56~60 (2018)
- Iwashita T, "A 19-gauge histology needle versus a 19-gauge standard needle in endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration for solid lesions : a multicenter randomized comparison study(GREATER Study)", Dig Dis Sci, 63, pp.1043~1051 (2018)
- Shinya Fujie, "Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of the Standard 22-Gauge Needle and the New 20-Gauge Forward-Bevel Core Biopsy Needle for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Pancreatic Lesions", Gut and Liver, 13(3), pp.349~355 (2019), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회[DOI]
- Kandel P, "EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle : a case-control study", Gastrointest Endosc, 84, pp.1034~1039 (2016)
- Jovani M, "Novel fork-tip needles versus standard needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid masses of the upper GI tract : a matched cohort study", Scand J Gastroenterol, 52, pp.784~787 (2017)
- Naveed M, "A Multicenter comparative trial of a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle(SharkCore(TM))with the 22-gauge needle in patients with solid pancreatic mass lesions", Endosc Ultrasound, 7, pp.34~40 (2018)
- Attili F, "Performance of a new histology needle for EUS-guided fine needle biopsy : a retrospective multicenter study", Dig Liver Dis, 50, pp.469~474 (2018)
- Bang JY, "Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design : initial assessment", Dig Endosc, 29, pp.338~346 (2017)
- Bang JY, "EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology", Gut, 67, pp.2081~2084 (2018)
- Mitri RD, "Performance of a new needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in patients with pancreatic solid lesions : a retrospective multicenter study", Endosc Ultrasound, 7, pp.329~334 (2018)
- Bang JY, "Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions", Gastrointest Endosc, 87, pp.1432~1438 (2018)
- Mukai S, "A retrospective histological comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a novel franseen needle and a conventional end-cut type needle", Endosc Ultrasound, 8, pp.50~57 (2019)
- Ishikawa T, "Clinical impact of EUSguided fine needle biopsy using a novel franseen needle for histological assessment of pancreatic diseases", Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, pp.8581743~ (2019)
- Khan MA, "A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy : diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment", Endosc Int Open, 5, pp.E363~E375 (2017)
- Nakai Y, "Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses", Dig Dis Sci, 59, pp.1578~1585 (2014)
- Cotton PB, "A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events : report of an ASGE workshop", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.446~454 (2010)
- Kanda Y, "Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics", Bone Marrow Transplant, 48, pp.452~458 (2013)
- Song TJ, "The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.1739~1745 (2010)
- Mukai S, "Multicenter, prospective, crossover trial comparing the door-knocking method with the conventional method for EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses(with videos)", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.1210~1217 (2016)
- Wani S, "The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses : a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial", Am J Gastroenterol, 110, pp.1429~1439 (2015)
- Erickson RA, "Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies", Gastrointest Endosc, 51, pp.184~190 (2000)
- LeBlanc JK, "Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis", Gastrointest Endosc, 59, pp.475~481 (2004)
- Mohamadnejad M, "Increasing number of passes beyond 4 does not increase sensitivity of detection of pancreatic malignancy by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 15, pp.1071~1078 (2017)
- Iwashita T, "Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions : a single-center prospective pilot study(MOSE study)", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.177~185 (2015)
- Nguyen YP, "Reliability of gross visual assessment of specimen adequacy during EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses", Gastrointest Endosc, 69, pp.1264~1270 (2009)
- Ishiwatari H, "Gross visual inspection by endosonographers during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration", Pancreatology, 19, pp.191~195 (2019)
- Ihab I. El Hajj, "Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions", Clinical Endoscopy, 51(6), pp.576~583 (2018), 대한소화기내시경학회