부양계약
Support Contract
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As South Korea approaches a super-aged society, the need for stable post-retirement income streams has become increasingly important. Many elderly individuals rely more on their accumulated assets than on income, as the current pension and welfare systems are insufficient to support their living standards. This paper explores the concept of “support contracts” as a legal mechanism to address these concerns. A support contract allows an elderly person (the beneficiary) to transfer assets to a caregiver (the obligor) in exchange for lifelong care or financial support. This paper discusses two types of support contracts: immediate asset transfer and future transfer upon death, analyzing their legal characteristics and potential conflicts with inheritance laws. It also examines the legal recourse available to beneficiaries when the obligor fails to fulfill their obligations, especially in types of immediate asset transfer, as well as the legal measure to protect the obligor when beneficiaries fail to transfer the property despite the obligor has fulfilled their obligations, especially in types of future transfer upon death.
Abstract
As South Korea approaches a super-aged society, the need for stable post-retirement income streams has become increasingly important. Many elderly individuals rely more on their accumulated assets than on income, as the current pension and welfare systems are insufficient to support their living standards. This paper explores the concept of “support contracts” as a legal mechanism to address these concerns. A support contract allows an elderly person (the beneficiary) to transfer assets to a caregiver (the obligor) in exchange for lifelong care or financial support. This paper discusses two types of support contracts: immediate asset transfer and future transfer upon death, analyzing their legal characteristics and potential conflicts with inheritance laws. It also examines the legal recourse available to beneficiaries when the obligor fails to fulfill their obligations, especially in types of immediate asset transfer, as well as the legal measure to protect the obligor when beneficiaries fail to transfer the property despite the obligor has fulfilled their obligations, especially in types of future transfer upon death.
참고문헌 (25)
- 郭潤直, "債權各論" (2003), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "｢民法注解｣ 第XIV卷: 債權 (7)" (1992), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "｢民法注解｣ 第XVI卷: 債權 (9)" (1992), 博英社
- 김상용, "채권각론" (2009), 화산미디어
- 金龍潭, (2016), 韓國司法行政學會
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2022), 法文社
- 송덕수, "채권법각론" (2019), 박영사
- 양창수, "민법 I : 계약법" (2024), 博英社
- 김한빈, "증여계약 해제에 관한 민법 개정시안 소고", 아주법학, 10(4) (2017)
- 김현수, "미국에서의 관계적 계약이론 ―Ian Macneil 이론의 학설사적 지위와 논지를 중심으로―", 財産法硏究, 32(4) (2016)
- 김형석, "양육비청구권을 자동채권으로 하는 상계", 家族法硏究, 21(3) (2007)
- 김형석, "사인증여", 民事法學, (91) (2020)
- 백경일, "相續契約에 관한 고찰 ―독일法과 프랑스法 등을 비교하여―", 저스티스, 192 (2022)
- 서종희, "미국의 기부연금제도 ―기부연금법안 도입시 고려해야 할 요소", 원광법학, 32(4) (2016)
- 서종희, "기부활성화를 위한 기부연금제 도입에 있어서의 한계 ―민법상 유류분과의 관계를 중심으로―", 외법논집, 43(1) (2019)
- 유영선, "유증과 등기", 사법논집, 29 (1998), 법원행정처
- 윤진수, "혼인과 이혼의 법경제학", 법경제학연구, 9(1) (2012)
- 윤진수, "유류분과 보상적 증여에 관한 개선입법의 방향", 법률신문, ~ (2024)
- 이지은, "사인증여의 철회에 대한 소고 ― 대법원 2022. 7. 28. 선고 2017다245330 판결", 민사법의 이론과 실무, 26(1) (2022)
- 최봉경, "민법 개정안의 몇 가지 쟁점에 관한 고찰 : 증여계약에 관한 민법개정안 연구", 법학, 55(4) (2014), 서울대학교
- 최수정, "부담부증여의 경계", 서울法學, 22(3) (2015)
- Foster, Frances H., "Linking Support and Inheritance: A New Model From China", ~ (1999)
- Levin, Jonathan, "Relational Incentive Contracts", American Economic Review, 93(3) (2003)
- Macneil, Ian R, "The Many Futures of Contract", Southern California Law Review, 47 (1974)
- "中华人民共和国继承法―注解与配套" (2017), 中國法制出版社