The feasibility and satisfaction of an online global health education course at a single medical school: a retrospective study
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and satisfaction of an online global health education course for medical students in comparison with an in-person of the course and to assess students’ preferences regarding online methods of delivery. Methods: Second-year medical students enrolled in this course in 2019 (in-person) and 2020 (online). The attendance rate, satisfaction in the course evaluation survey, and academic achievement on the written final examination were utilized to compare the two different methods of course delivery. The medical students who took the online course were also asked about their preferences regarding the method of course delivery and the advantages and drawbacks of each method of online lectures. Results: There was no significant difference in the attendance rate and overall satisfaction between the two groups. The mean score on the written examination of the online course (84.1±19.6) showed comparable effects to the in-person course (78.0±18.3). The percentages of students who achieved high performance (55.5%) and the achieved minimum requirement (95.9%) were also maintained compared to the in-person course (14.6% and 93.6%, respectively). Medical students preferred the online course to the in-person course; in particular, they preferred prerecorded videos over live streaming online lectures. Conclusion: The participation, satisfaction, and the academic achievement of the online course were comparable to those of the in-person course. However, the greatest drawback of the online course was the lack of interaction between peer learners. Therefore, diverse methods for online education should be considered to increase students’ sense of belonging to a learning community.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and satisfaction of an online global health education course for medical students in comparison with an in-person of the course and to assess students’ preferences regarding online methods of delivery. Methods: Second-year medical students enrolled in this course in 2019 (in-person) and 2020 (online). The attendance rate, satisfaction in the course evaluation survey, and academic achievement on the written final examination were utilized to compare the two different methods of course delivery. The medical students who took the online course were also asked about their preferences regarding the method of course delivery and the advantages and drawbacks of each method of online lectures. Results: There was no significant difference in the attendance rate and overall satisfaction between the two groups. The mean score on the written examination of the online course (84.1±19.6) showed comparable effects to the in-person course (78.0±18.3). The percentages of students who achieved high performance (55.5%) and the achieved minimum requirement (95.9%) were also maintained compared to the in-person course (14.6% and 93.6%, respectively). Medical students preferred the online course to the in-person course; in particular, they preferred prerecorded videos over live streaming online lectures. Conclusion: The participation, satisfaction, and the academic achievement of the online course were comparable to those of the in-person course. However, the greatest drawback of the online course was the lack of interaction between peer learners. Therefore, diverse methods for online education should be considered to increase students’ sense of belonging to a learning community.
참고문헌 (18)
- Margolis CZ, "Bringing global issues to medical teaching", Lancet, 359(9313), pp.1253~1254 (2002)
- Frenk J, "Health professionals for a new century : transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world", Lancet, 376(9756), pp.1923~1958 (2010)
- "Seoul National University College of Medicine brochure" (2018)[URL]
- "Online education of Seoul National University College of Medicine" (2020)[URL]
- Sandhu P, "The impact of COVID-19 on the undergraduate medical curriculum", Med Educ Online, 25(1), pp.1764740~ (2020)
- Gruner D, "Introducing global health into the undergraduate medical school curriculum using an e-learning program : a mixed method pilot study", BMC Med Educ, 15, pp.142~ (2015)
- 임은정, "의학교육에 있어서 이러닝(e-learning)의 가능성과 한계", 의학교육논단, 11(1), pp.21~33 (2009), 연세대학교 의과대학
- Cho KJ, "An impact of peer learners’ feedback (in reflection activity using SNS) on learners’ academic self-efficacy, meta-cognition and learning achievement", pp.2015
- Bozorgmehr K, "The ‘global health’ education framework : a conceptual guide for monitoring, evaluation and practice", Global Health, 7, pp.8~ (2011)
- Ambrose M, "Learning global health : a pilot study of an online collaborative intercultural peer group activity involving medical students in Australia and Indonesia", BMC Med Educ, 17(1), pp.10~ (2017)
- Macdonald C, "Evaluation of online health and wellness resources for healthcare professionals", Int J Adv Corp Learn, 4(2), pp.18~23 (2011)
- Noh SM, "The effect of cyber class in medical education", Korean J Med Educ, 14(1), pp.61~71 (2002)
- 박주현, "의학교육에서 e-러닝의 활용 및 효과성에 대한 고찰", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 22(2), pp.91~100 (2010), 한국의학교육학회
- Chumley-Jones HS, "Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype?: a review of the evaluation literature", Acad Med, 77(10 Suppl), pp.S86~S93 (2002)
- Hrastinski S, "Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning", Educ Q, 31(4), pp.51~55 (2008)
- Strijbos JW, "The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency during computer-supported collaborative learning : a matter of triangulation", Comput Human Behav, 23(1), pp.353~380 (2007)
- Arkorful V, "The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education", Int J Instr Technol Distance Learn, 12(1), pp.29~42 (2015)
- Chang H, "The development of a learning community in an e-learning environment", Int J Pedagog Learn, 7(2), pp.154~161 (2012)
