한국어판 노인음성지수의 신뢰도와 타당도
Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of the Aging Voice Index (KAVI)
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Objectives：Voice disorder is recognized as a major problem because it negatively affects the elderly’s social participation and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of Korean aging voice index (KAVI), which assesses the quality of life related to the voice of the elderly. Materials and Method：This study was conducted on 211 elderly people aged 65 years or older : 111 patients with voice disorder (mean age 69.8, range 65-80 years) and 100 nomorphonic participants (mean age 70.6, range 65-82 years). Aging voice index was translated into Korean and used and Korean voice-related quality of life (KVQOL) was conducted to verify KAVI. The validity (item validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity) and reliability (test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability) of KAVI. Results：The item validity (ICC=0.895) and construct validity (r=0.765) showed a high correlation, respectively. And concurrent validity (r=0.748), test-retest reliability (0.851), and internal consistency reliability (α=0.832) were statistically significant in voice disorder group. In addition, there was a significant difference between the voice disorder and the nomorphonic group in AVI total score. Conclusion： KAVI is a validated and reliable quality of life tool that will be useful for assessing the presence and effectiveness of interventions in clinical settings.
Abstract
Background and Objectives：Voice disorder is recognized as a major problem because it negatively affects the elderly’s social participation and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of Korean aging voice index (KAVI), which assesses the quality of life related to the voice of the elderly. Materials and Method：This study was conducted on 211 elderly people aged 65 years or older : 111 patients with voice disorder (mean age 69.8, range 65-80 years) and 100 nomorphonic participants (mean age 70.6, range 65-82 years). Aging voice index was translated into Korean and used and Korean voice-related quality of life (KVQOL) was conducted to verify KAVI. The validity (item validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity) and reliability (test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability) of KAVI. Results：The item validity (ICC=0.895) and construct validity (r=0.765) showed a high correlation, respectively. And concurrent validity (r=0.748), test-retest reliability (0.851), and internal consistency reliability (α=0.832) were statistically significant in voice disorder group. In addition, there was a significant difference between the voice disorder and the nomorphonic group in AVI total score. Conclusion： KAVI is a validated and reliable quality of life tool that will be useful for assessing the presence and effectiveness of interventions in clinical settings.
참고문헌 (17)
- United Nations, New York, Ny. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, "World population ageing, 1950-2050", United Nations Publications, ~ (2002)
- Korea Statistical Information Service, "Population and Housing Census", Statistics Korea, ~ (2017)
- Roy N, "Epidemiology of voice disorders in the elderly : preliminary findings", Laryngoscope, 117(4), pp.628~633 (2007)
- Yamauchi A, "Evaluation of vocal fold vibration with an assessment form for high-speed digital imaging : comparative study between healthy young and elderly subjects", J Voice, 26(6), pp.742~750 (2012)
- Wilson JA, "The quality of life impact of dysphonia", Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci, 27(3), pp.179~182 (2002)
- Branski RC, "Measuring quality of life in dysphonic patients : a systematic review of content development in patient-reported outcomes measures", J Voice, 24(2), pp.193~198 (2010)
- Francis DO, "Voice-related patient-reported outcome measures : a systematic review of instrument development and validation", J Speech Lang Hear Res, 60(1), pp.62~88 (2017)
- Jacobson BH, "The voice handicap index(VHI) : development and validation", Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 6(3), pp.66~70 (1997)
- 김재옥, "한국어판 음성장애지수와 음성관련 삶의 질의 타당도 및 신뢰도 연구", 음성과학, 14(3), pp.111~125 (2007), 한국음성과학회
- 윤영선, "한국어판 음성장애지수(Voice Handicap Index, VHI)의 타당도 및 VHI-10의 임상적 유용성", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 13(2), pp.216~241 (2008), 한국언어청각임상학회
- Rosen CA, "Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10", Laryngoscope, 114(9), pp.1549~1556 (2004)
- Hogikyan ND, "Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life(V-RQOL)", J Voice, 13(4), pp.557~569 (1999)
- Etter NM, "Aging Voice Index (AVI): Reliability and Validity of a Voice Quality of Life Scale for Older Adults", J Voice (2018)
- Schwartz SR, "Clinical practice guideline: hoarseness (dysphonia)", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 141(1_suppl), pp.1~31 (2009)
- Martins RHG, "Aging voice : presbyphonia", Aging Clin Exp Res, 26(1), pp.1~5 (2014)
- Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, "Vocal aging and the impact on daily life : a longitudinal study", J Voice, 18(2), pp.193~202 (2004)
- Etter NM, "Defining the Lived Experience of Older Adults With Voice Disorders", J Voice, 27(1), pp.61~67 (2013)