본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

노인성 음성장애의 중증도 지표로 Acoustic Voice Quality Index(AVQI)의 유용성

Efficacy of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index As a Measure of Dysphonia Severity in Age-Related Dysphonia

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

The purpose of this study was to explore the criterion-related concurrent validity of two standardized auditory-perceptual assessments and the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) for measuring dysphonia severity in aging voice population. Materials and Methods:292 subjects with aging voice and 121 normal voice subjects were asked to sustain the vowel [a:] and to read aloud the Korean text ‘‘Walk’’. A 2second mid-vowel portion of the sustained vowel and two sentences (with 26 syllables) were edited, concatenated, and analyzed according to Praat script. And then auditory-perceptual assessment was performed by three raters. Results:The aging voice group showed higher AVQI, G and OS values than normal voice group. And the correlation among AVQI, G, and OS ranged from 0.827 to 0.902. In ROC curve analysis, cutoff values of AVQI, G, and OS were <4.22, <0.00, and <30.00, respectively, and the AUC of each analysis was over .90. Conclusions:AVQI and auditory evaluation can improve the early screening ability of aging voice and help to establish effective diagnosis and treatment plan for age-related dysphonia.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the criterion-related concurrent validity of two standardized auditory-perceptual assessments and the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) for measuring dysphonia severity in aging voice population. Materials and Methods:292 subjects with aging voice and 121 normal voice subjects were asked to sustain the vowel [a:] and to read aloud the Korean text ‘‘Walk’’. A 2second mid-vowel portion of the sustained vowel and two sentences (with 26 syllables) were edited, concatenated, and analyzed according to Praat script. And then auditory-perceptual assessment was performed by three raters. Results:The aging voice group showed higher AVQI, G and OS values than normal voice group. And the correlation among AVQI, G, and OS ranged from 0.827 to 0.902. In ROC curve analysis, cutoff values of AVQI, G, and OS were <4.22, <0.00, and <30.00, respectively, and the AUC of each analysis was over .90. Conclusions:AVQI and auditory evaluation can improve the early screening ability of aging voice and help to establish effective diagnosis and treatment plan for age-related dysphonia.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Kendall K, "Presbyphonia: a review", Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 15(3), pp.137~140 (2007)[DOI]
  2. Hirano S, "Therapeutic potential of growth factors for aging voice", Laryngoscope, 114(12), pp.2161~2167 (2004)[DOI]
  3. Ford C, "Voice restoration in presbyphonia", Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 130(9), pp.1117~ (2004)[DOI]
  4. Sataloff RT, "The aging adult voice", Journal of Voice, 11, pp.156~160 (1997)[DOI]
  5. Costa HO, "Vocal impact on quality of life of elderly female subjects", Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 71(2), pp.172~178 (2005)[DOI]
  6. Roy N, "Epidemiology of voice disorders in the elderly: preliminary findings", Laryngoscope, 117(4), pp.628~633 (2007)[DOI]
  7. 김성태, "노인성 음성장애의 음성치료 효과", 말소리와 음성과학, 2(2), pp.117~121 (2010), 한국음성학회
  8. 허명진, "노인 음성의 음향학적 특성", 언어치료연구, 19(2), pp.41~51 (2010), 한국언어치료학회[DOI]
  9. 송윤경, "노인 음성장애 출현율 및 음성장애지수 특성", 말소리와 음성과학, 4(3), pp.151~159 (2012), 한국음성학회
  10. 김근효, "성문암과 후두백반증 음성의 켑스트럼 분석 및 청지각적 평가 : 연장모음과 연속발화", 언어치료연구, 25(3), pp.135~145 (2016), 한국언어치료학회[DOI]
  11. Maryn Y, "The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: Toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders", Journal of Communication Disorders, 43(3), pp.161~174 (2010)[DOI]
  12. Uloza V, "Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language", Journal of Voice, 31(2), pp.257~251 (2017)
  13. Hosokawa K, "Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language", Journal of Voice, 31(2), pp.260~261 (2017)
  14. Maryn Y, "Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech", Journal of Voice, 30(5), pp.587~594 (2016)[DOI]
  15. Maryn Y, "The value of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages", European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 271(6), pp.1609~1619 (2014)
  16. Barsties B, "The Acoustic Voice Quality Index. Toward expanded measurement of dysphonia severity in German subjects", HNO, 60(8), pp.715~720 (2012)[DOI]
  17. Eskenazi L, "Acoustic correlates of vocal quality", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33(2), pp.298~306 (1990)[DOI]
  18. Reynolds V, "Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index", Journal of Voice, 26(5), pp.672~ (2012)
  19. Barsties B, "The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality", Journal of Voice, 31(2), pp.202~210 (2017)[DOI]
  20. 조영남, "전산화 인지재활이 뇌졸중 노인의 인지기능에 미치는 효과", 특수교육재활과학연구, 51(4), pp.261~278 (2012), 특수교육재활과학연구소
  21. Maryn Y, "Toward Improved Ecological Validity in the Acoustic Measurement of Overall Voice Quality: Combining Continuous Speech and Sustained Vowels", Journal of Voice, 24(5), pp.540~555 (2010)[DOI]
  22. Ingrisano DRS, "Environmental noise: A threat to automatic voice analysis", American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7(1), pp.91~96 (1998)[DOI]
  23. Deliyski DD, "Adverse Effects of Environmental Noise on Acoustic Voice Quality Measurements", Journal of Voice, 19(1), pp.15~28 (2005)[DOI]
  24. Hirano M, "Psyco-acoustic evaluation of voice. Clinical examination of voice: disorders of human communication", pp.81~84 (1981)
  25. Karnell MP, "Reliability of Clinician-Based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and Patient-Based (V-RQOL and IPVI) Documentation of Voice Disorders", Journal of Voice, 21(5), pp.576~590 (2007)[DOI]
  26. Rumsey DJ, "Statistics For Dummies" (2011), Wiley
  27. Maryn Y, "Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), pp.2619~2634 (2009)[DOI]
  28. Alpan A, "Assessment of disordered voice via the first rahmonic", Speech Communication, 54(5), pp.655~663 (2012)[DOI]
  29. Maryn Y, "Objective Dysphonia Measures in the Program Praat: Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence and Acoustic Voice Quality Index", Journal of Voice, 29(1), pp.35~43 (2015)[DOI]
  30. Watts CR, "A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs", J Voice, 31(3), pp.387.e1~387.e10 (2017)[DOI]
  31. 임윤성, "노인성 음성의 임상적 특징 및 치료", 임상이비인후과, 21(2), pp.199~205 (2010), 대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회[DOI]
  32. Mezzedimi C, "Objective Evaluation of Presbyphonia: Spectroacoustic Study on 142 Patients with Praat", Journal of Voice, 31(2), pp.387.e1~387.e10 (2017)[DOI]
  33. Vaca M, "Clinical Assessment of Glottal Insufficiency in Age-related Dysphonia", Journal of Voice, 31(1), pp.128.e1~128.e5 (2017)[DOI]
  34. Nemr K, "GRBAS and Cape-V Scales: High Reliability and Consensus When Applied at Different Times", Journal of Voice, 26(6), pp.812~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)