Decision-Making & Quantum Mechanical Models of Cognitive Processing
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There have been numerous neurobiological theories positing that quantum mechanics is importantly responsible for certain psychological phenomena, such as consciousness and conscious decision-making. In this respect, such theories understand the relevant aspects of the brain to be “quantum mechanical.” Although it is highly questionable whether any of these theories have the requisite or sufficient empirical evidence strictly within the domain of neuroscience to appropriately justify their views, a different approach to arguing that quantum mechanics is importantly relevant to human decision-making will be discussed. By putting various puzzle pieces together of empirical evidence in psychology that quantum probability models describe certain human cognitive decision-making processes, I contend that human decision-making overall is best described by quantum mechanical processes. Finally, I at times provide a novel defense of this view from a number of objections.
Abstract
There have been numerous neurobiological theories positing that quantum mechanics is importantly responsible for certain psychological phenomena, such as consciousness and conscious decision-making. In this respect, such theories understand the relevant aspects of the brain to be “quantum mechanical.” Although it is highly questionable whether any of these theories have the requisite or sufficient empirical evidence strictly within the domain of neuroscience to appropriately justify their views, a different approach to arguing that quantum mechanics is importantly relevant to human decision-making will be discussed. By putting various puzzle pieces together of empirical evidence in psychology that quantum probability models describe certain human cognitive decision-making processes, I contend that human decision-making overall is best described by quantum mechanical processes. Finally, I at times provide a novel defense of this view from a number of objections.
참고문헌 (102)
- Aerts, D., "Quantum structure in cognition", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, pp.314~348 (2009)
- Aerts, D., "Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes", Foundations of Science, 1, pp.85~97 (1994)
- Aerts, D., "A quantum structure description of the liar paradox", International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38, pp.3231~3239 (2004)
- Albers, J., "Routes to Chaos in Neural Networks with Random Weights", International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 8, pp.1463~1478 (1998)
- Atmanspacher, H., "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (2011)
- Atmanspacher, H., "Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception", Biological Cybernetics, 90, pp.33~40 (2004)
- Barton, J., "DNA-mediated Electron Transfer Chemistry" (1999), Institute of Technology
- Beatty, R. B. a. J., "The Propensity Interpretation of 'Fitness': No Interpretation is No Substitute", Philosophy of Science, 51, pp.342~347 (1984)
- Beck, F., "Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness", Proceeding sof the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 89, pp.11357~11361 (1992)
- Birbaumer, N., "Chaos and Order in the Human Brain", Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement, 44, pp.450~459 (1995)
- Bishop, R., "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (2008)
- Bishop, R., "The Oxford Handbook of Free Will", pp.92~ (2011), Oxford University Press
- Block, Ned, "Do Causal Powers Drain Away?", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67, pp.133~150 (2003)
- Blutner, Reinhard, "Quantum cognition and bounded rationality", Synthese, pp.1~53 (2015)
- Blutner, R., "A Quantum Probability Perspective on Borderline Vagueness", Topics in Cognitive Sciences, 5, pp.711~736 (2013)
- Bordley, R., "Experiment-dependent priors in psycholog", Theory and Decision, 47(3), pp.213~227 (1999)
- Brandon, R., "Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory", Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 9, pp.181~206 (1978)
- Brandon, R., "Adaptation and Environment" (1990), Princeton University Press
- Bruza, P., "Introduction to the Special Edition of Quantum Cognition", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, pp.303~305 (2009)
- Bruza, P., "Is there something quantumlike about the human mental lexicon", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, pp.362~377 (2009)
- Bruza, P., "Quantum cognition: A new theoretical approach to psychology", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(7), pp.383~393 (2015)
- Bruza, P., "Handbook of quantum logic, quantum structures, and quantum computation 2", pp.625~660 (2008), Elsevier
- Burian, R., "Adaptations. Dimensions of Darwinism" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Busemeyer, J., "Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision" (2012), Cambridge University Press
- Busemeyer, J., "An information processing explanation of disjunction effects" (2006), Erlbaum
- Busemeyer, J., "A Quantum Theoretical Explanation for Probability Judgment Errors", Pscyhological Review, 118, pp.193~218 (2011)
- Busemeyer, J., "Empirical comparison of Markov and quantum models of decision making", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, pp.423~433 (2009)
- Busemeyer, J., "The conjunction fallacy, confirmation, and quantum theory: comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013)", J. Exp. Psychol. Gen, 144, pp.236~243 (2015)
- Chalmers, David, "The Conscious Mind" (1996), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Conte, E., "Mental states follow quantum mechanics during perception and cognition of ambiguous figures", Open Systems and Information Dynamics, pp.1~17 (2009)
- Conte, E., "On the possibilitythat we think in a quantum mechanical manner: An experimental verification of existing quantum intereference effects in cognitive anomaly of conjunction fallacy", Chaos and Complexity Letters, 4, pp.123~136 (2009)
- Croson, R., "The disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, pp.118~133 (1999)
- Cullis, A.G., "Visible light emission due to quantum size effects in highly porous crystalline silicon", Nature, 353, pp.335~338 (1991)
- Di Nunzio, G. M., "Interference in text categorization experiments", Quantum Interaction: 7th International Conference (2013), Springer
- Dzhafarov, E. N., "Contextuality is about identity of random variables", Physica Scripta, T163, pp.014009~ (2014)
- Dzhafarov, E. N., "Contextuality in three types of quantum-mechanical systems", Foundations of Physic (2015)
- Eisert, J., "Quantum games and quantum strategies", Physcial Review Letters, 83, pp.3077~3080 (1999)
- "Risk, ambiguity and quantum decision theory" (2007)[URL]
- "Belief revision in quantum decision theory: Gambler's and hot hand fallacies" (2008)[URL]
- "The inverse fallacy and quantum formalism" (2008)[URL]
- Franco, R., "The conjunction fallacy and interference effects", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, pp.415~422 (2009)
- Fuss, I. G., "Open Parallel Cooperative and Competitive Decision Processes: A Potential Provenance for Quantum Probability Decision Models", Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, pp.818~843 (2013)
- Gabora, L., "Contextualizing concepts using a mathematical generalization of the quantum formalism", Journal of Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell, 14, pp.327~358 (2002)
- Greiner, M., "Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms", Nature, 415(6867), pp.39~44 (2002)
- Hagan, S., "Quantum computation in brain microtubules: Decoherence and biological feasibility", Physical Review E, 65(6), pp.061901~ (2002)
- Hameroff, S., "Conscious event as orchestrated spacetime selections", Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1), pp.36~53 (1996)
- Hartmann, L., "Steady state entanglement in open and noisy quantum systems at high temperature", Physical Review A, 74, pp.052304~ (2006)
- Ivancevic, V., "Life space foam: A medium for motivational and cognitive dynamics", Physica A, 382, pp.616~630 (2007)
- Kane, Robert, "The Significance of Free Will" (1998), Oxford University Press
- Khrennikov, A., "Classical and quantum mechanics on information spaces with applications to cognitive, psychological, social, and anomalous phenomena", Foundations of Physics, 29, pp.1065~1098 (1999)
- Khrennikov, A., "Fundamental theories of physics", pp.138~ (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- "A model of quantum-like decision-making with applications to psychology and cognitive science" (2007)[URL]
- Khrennikov, A., "Ubiquitous quantum structure: From psychology to finance" (2010), Springer-Verlag
- Kolmogorov, A., "Foundations of the Theory of Probability" (1933), Chelsea Publishing Company
- Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., "Type indeterminacy:A model of the KT (Kahneman-Tversky)-Man", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, pp.349~361 (2009)
- Li, J., "Generation and propagation of entanglement in driven coupled-qubit systems", New Journal of Physics, 11, pp.113020~ (2009)
- Li, S., "Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in Prisoner's Dilemma games", Chinese Journal of Psychology, 44, pp.25~46 (2002)
- Libet, B., "Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential)", Brain, 106(3), pp.623~642 (1983)
- Lockwood, M., "Mind, Brain & the Quantum" (1989), Blackwell
- Mayer-Kress, G., "Nonlinear Dynamics, Chaos, and Brain Signals", Psychophysiology, 25, pp.419~ (1988)
- Mayer-Kress, G., "Mathematical Approaches to Brain Functioning Diagnostics" (1991), World Scientific
- Mills, S., "The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness", Philosophy of Science, 46, pp.263~286 (1979)
- Mogiliansky, A., "Type indeterminacy: A model of the KT (Kahneman-Tversky)-man", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, pp.349~361 (2006)
- Mura, P. L., "Decision theory in the presence of uncertainty and risk" (2005), HHL-Arbeitspapier
- Mura, P. L., "Projective expected utility", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, pp.408~414 (2009)
- Neumann, J. V., "Mathematical foundations of quantum theory" (1932), Princeton University Press
- Nielsen, M., "Quantum computation and quantum information" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Nunn, C., "Collapse of a Quantum Field May Affect Brain Function", Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1, pp.127~139 (1994)
- Penrose, R., "The Emperor's New Mind" (1989), Oxford University Press
- Penrose, R., "Shadows of the Mind" (1994), Oxford University Press
- Piotrowski, E., "An invitation to quantum game theory", International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 42, pp.1089~ (2003)
- Pothos, E., "A quantum probability explanation for violations of 'rational' decision theory", Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, pp.2171~2178 (2009)
- Pribram, K., "Rethinking neural networks: Quantum fields and biological data" (1993), Earlbaum
- Richardson, R., "East Lansing", pp.2~ (1992), Philosophy of Science Association
- Rijsbergen, C. V., "The geometry of information retrieval" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Romero, E., "Quantum coherence in photosynthesis for efficient solar energy conversion", Nature Physics, 10, pp.676~682 (2014)
- Salmon, W., "Scientific Explanation: Causation and Unification", Critica, 66, pp.3~23 (1990)
- Savage, L. J., "The Foundations of Statistics" (1954), John Wiley & Sons
- Simon, Herbert, "Models of Man: Social and Rational" (1957), Wiley
- Smith, Q., "Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives", pp.409~446 (2003), Oxford University Press
- Sober, E., "The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus" (1984), University of Chicago Press
- Sozzo, Sandro, "A quantum probability explanation in Fock space for borderline contradictions", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 58, pp.1~12 (2014)
- Stapp, H., "Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics" (1993), Springer
- Stolarz-Fantino, S., "The conjunction effect:new evidence for robustness", Am. J. Psychol, 116, pp.15~34 (2003)
- Suppes, Patrick, "A Probabilistic Theory of Causality" (1970), North-Holland Publishing Co
- Tegmark, M., "Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes", Physical Review E, 61, pp.4194~4206 (2000)
- Townsend, J., "Exploring the relations between categorization and decision making with regard to realistic face stimuli", Pragmatics and Cognition, 8, pp.83~105 (2000)
- Trueblood, J., "A quantum probability account of order effects in inference", Cognitive Science, 35, pp.1518~1552 (2011)
- Tse, Peter, "The Neural Basis of Free Will" (2013), The MIT Press
- Tversky, A., "Judgments of and by representativeness Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases" (1982), Cambridge University Press
- Tversky, A., "Extension versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment", Psychological Review, 90, pp.293~315 (1983)
- Tversky, A., "The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty", Psychological Science, 3, pp.305~309 (1992)
- Villejoubert, G., "The inverse fallacy: An account of deviations from Bayes’s Theorem and the additivity principle", Memory &Cognition, 30, pp.171~178 (2002)
- Vitiello, G., "My Double Unveiled" (2001), Benjamins
- Wang, Z., "A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction", Top. Cogn. Sci, 5, pp.689~710 (2013)
- Wang, Z., "Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 111, pp.9431~9436 (2014)
- Wegner, Daniel, "The Illusion of Conscious Will" (2002), The MIT Press
- Widdows, D., "Geometry and meaning" (2006), CSLI Publications
- Yates, J., "Conjunction errors: Evidence for multiple judgment procedures including signed summation", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, pp.230~253 (1986)
- arXiv: 0802.3597v1, "2008", ~
- Yukalov, V., "Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement", Theory and Decision, 68, pp.1~46 (2010)
