본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Acting in the World: A Physical Model of Free Choice

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

As science reaches further into the cognitive domain, questions once thought firmly outside the realm of science are becoming subjects of scientific inquiry. One of the foremost challenges is the relationship of our thoughts and intentions to the world we study and manipulate. Once thought intractable, this problem seems newly open to scientific discovery. Neurological correlates of many cognitive functions are being discovered, yielding advances in medicine and education. The growth of artificial intelligence raises the possibility that intelligent behavior can be understood scientifically, formalized, and engineered into intelligent devices. Yet the problem of free will eludes our grasp. We have the distinct sense that we make choices, and those choices have effects. The world is different from what it would have been had we chosen otherwise. But could we really have chosen otherwise, or are the choices we make determined by the electrochemistry of our brains? This paper examines a proposed theory of a physical basis for efficacious free choice, and asks whether it can be operationalized as a concrete, falsifiable model. The hypothesized mechanism involves automatic generation by the brain of templates for action, which are held in place by rapidly repeated quantum self-measurement events. A computer simulation of this model could support investigation of whether, using biologically plausible parameter settings, the hypothesized mechanism can produce macroscopic behavioral effects. Ultimately, such investigations could lead to empirical tests of the theory.

Abstract

As science reaches further into the cognitive domain, questions once thought firmly outside the realm of science are becoming subjects of scientific inquiry. One of the foremost challenges is the relationship of our thoughts and intentions to the world we study and manipulate. Once thought intractable, this problem seems newly open to scientific discovery. Neurological correlates of many cognitive functions are being discovered, yielding advances in medicine and education. The growth of artificial intelligence raises the possibility that intelligent behavior can be understood scientifically, formalized, and engineered into intelligent devices. Yet the problem of free will eludes our grasp. We have the distinct sense that we make choices, and those choices have effects. The world is different from what it would have been had we chosen otherwise. But could we really have chosen otherwise, or are the choices we make determined by the electrochemistry of our brains? This paper examines a proposed theory of a physical basis for efficacious free choice, and asks whether it can be operationalized as a concrete, falsifiable model. The hypothesized mechanism involves automatic generation by the brain of templates for action, which are held in place by rapidly repeated quantum self-measurement events. A computer simulation of this model could support investigation of whether, using biologically plausible parameter settings, the hypothesized mechanism can produce macroscopic behavioral effects. Ultimately, such investigations could lead to empirical tests of the theory.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Stephen L. Adler, "Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34(1), pp.135~142 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  2. Altenmüller, T. P., "Dynamics by measurement: Aharonov’s inverse quantum Zeno effect", Physical Review. A, Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 48(1), pp.70~79 (1993)
  3. Christophe Andrieu, "An Introduction to MCMC for Machine Learning", Machine Learning, 50(1, pp.2) (2003), 5~43[DOI]
  4. Philip Ball, "Physics of life: The dawn of quantum biology", Nature, 474(7351), pp.272~274 (2011), Springer Nature[DOI]
  5. Bishop, C. M., "Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition" (1996), Clarendon Press
  6. Buxhoeveden, D. P., "The minicolumn hypothesis in neuroscience", Brain, 125(5), pp.935~951 (2002)[DOI]
  7. Cataldi, M., "Difference in apparent pore sizes of low and high voltage-activated Ca2+ channels", Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, pp.45969~45976 (2002)
  8. Chalmers, David, "Facing up to the problem of consciousness", Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), pp.200~219 (1995)
  9. Claudel, M., "Full speed ahead: How the driverless car could transform cities" (2015), McKinsey Quartely
  10. "Compatibilism" (2015)[URL]
  11. Dehaene, S., "Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering How the Brain Codes Our Thoughts" (2014), Viking
  12. Dennett, D. C., "Facing backwards on the problem of consciousness", Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1), pp.4~6 (1996)
  13. Hugh Everett, ""Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics", Reviews of Modern Physics, 29(3), pp.454~462 (1957), American Physical Society (APS)[DOI]
  14. Flavio Fröhlich, "Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity", Neuron, 67(1), pp.129~143 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  15. Garfinkel, L., "Lung cancer and smoking trends in the United States over the past 25 years", CA : A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 41(3), pp.137~145 (1991)
  16. Danko Georgiev, "No-go Theorem for Stapp’s Quantum Zeno Model of Mind-Brain Interaction", NeuroQuantology, 13(2) (2015), NeuroQuantology Journal[DOI]
  17. Danko Georgiev, "Monte Carlo simulation of quantum Zeno effect in the brain", International Journal of Modern Physics B, 29(07), pp.1550039~ (2015), World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt[DOI]
  18. Umut Güçlü, "Modeling the Dynamics of Human Brain Activity with Recurrent Neural Networks", Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11 (2017), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  19. Haggard, P., "On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements", Experimental Brain Research, 126, pp.128~133 (1999)
  20. "Toyota built a robot to help a paralyzed Army vet around the house" (2017)[URL]
  21. Suzana Herculano-Houzel, "The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain", Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3 (2009), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  22. Andrew Howard, "Multi-robot Simultaneous Localization and Mapping using Particle Filters", The International Journal of Robotics Research, 25(12), pp.1243~1256 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  23. James, W., "Psychology: The Briefer Course" (1984), Harvard University Press
  24. Peter Jedlicka, "Revisiting the Quantum Brain Hypothesis: Toward Quantum (Neuro)biology?", Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 10 (2017), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  25. Joos, E., "Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems", pp.1~17 (1999), Springer
  26. Kathryn Blackmond Laskey, "Quantum Physical Symbol Systems", Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 15(1-2), pp.109~154 (2006), Springer Nature[DOI]
  27. Laskey, K.B., "Quantum Causal Networks", Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Quantum Interaction (2007), AAAI Press
  28. Libet, B., "Mind Time: The Temporal Factor in Consciousness" (2005), Harvard University Press
  29. Libet, B., "Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action", Behavioural & Brain Sciences, 8, pp.529~566 (1985)
  30. Libet, B., "Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential)", Brain, 106, pp.623~642 (1983)
  31. A. Manju, "Applications of quantum inspired computational intelligence: a survey", Artificial Intelligence Review, 42(1), pp.79~156 (2014), Springer Nature[DOI]
  32. McFadden, J., "The CEMI Field Theory Closing the Loop", Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(1-2), pp.1~2 (2013)
  33. McFadden, J., "The Conscious Electromagnetic Information (CEMI) Field Theory: The Hard Problem Made Easy?", Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(8), pp.45~60 (2002)
  34. McFadden, J. J., "Quantum Evolution" (2000), Norton
  35. Mele, A. R., "Effective Intentions: The Power of Conscious Will" (2009), Oxford University Press
  36. N. David Mermin, "What's Wrong with this Pillow?", Physics Today, 42(4), pp.9~11 (1989), AIP Publishing[DOI]
  37. Misra, B., "The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory", Journal of Mathematical Physics, 18, pp.756~763 (1977)
  38. Newell, A., "Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry:Symbols and Search", Communications of the ACM, 19(3), pp.113~126 (1976)
  39. Nilsson, N. J., "50 Years of Artificial Intelligence", pp.9~17 (2007), Springer
  40. Y. S. Patil, "Measurement-Induced Localization of an Ultracold Lattice Gas", Physical Review Letters, 115(14) (2015), American Physical Society (APS)[DOI]
  41. Pearl, J., "Causality: models, reasoning, and inference" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  42. Judea Pearl, "Causal inference in statistics: An overview", Statistics Surveys, 3(0), pp.96~146 (2009), Institute of Mathematical Statistics[DOI]
  43. Pockett, S., "The Nature of Consciousness: A Hypothesis" (2000), Writers Club Press
  44. Rosenblum, B., "Quantum Enigma : Physics Encounters Consciousness(2 edition)" (2011), Oxford University Press
  45. Lambèr Royakkers, "A Literature Review on New Robotics: Automation from Love to War", International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(5), pp.549~570 (2015), Springer Nature[DOI]
  46. Doug Rubino, "Propagating waves mediate information transfer in the motor cortex", Nature Neuroscience, 9(12), pp.1549~1557 (2006), Springer Nature[DOI]
  47. Vahid Salari, "Quantum Interference and Selectivity through Biological Ion Channels", Scientific Reports, 7(1) (2017), Springer Nature[DOI]
  48. V. Salari, "Quantum decoherence time scales for ionic superposition states in ion channels", Physical Review E, 91(3) (2015), American Physical Society (APS)[DOI]
  49. Literature Review of Mobile Robots for Manufacturing, "Shneier, M.", National Institute of Standards and Technology, ~, pp.NIST Interagency (2015), Internal Report (NISTIR) No. 8022
  50. A. Schurger, "An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), pp.E2904~E2913 (2012), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences[DOI]
  51. Schwartz, J. M., "Quantum Physics in Neuroscience and Psychology : A New Model with Respect to Mind", Brain Interaction, 2005, pp.360(1458), 1309~1327
  52. Henry P. Stapp, "Quantum Interactive Dualism : An Alternative to Materialism", Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(11), pp.43~58 (2005)
  53. Stapp, H. P., "Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer" (2011), Springer
  54. Henry Stapp, "Reply to Georgiev: No-Go for Georgiev’s No-Go Theorem", NeuroQuantology, 13(2) (2015), NeuroQuantology Journal[DOI]
  55. Stapp, H. P., "Quantum Theory and Free Will: How Mental Intentions Translate into Bodily Actions" (2017), Springer
  56. Johann Summhammer, "A quantum-mechanical description of ion motion within the confining potentials of voltage-gated ion channels", Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 11(02), pp.123~135 (2012), World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt[DOI]
  57. Vaidman, L., "The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (2016), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
  58. Mariska J. Vansteensel, "Fully Implanted Brain–Computer Interface in a Locked-In Patient with ALS", New England Journal of Medicine, 375(21), pp.2060~2066 (2016), Massachusetts Medical Society[DOI]
  59. Vaziri, A., "Quantum coherence in ion channels: resonances, transport and verification", New Journal of Physics, 12(8), pp.085001~ (2010)[DOI]
  60. von Neumann, J., "Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics" (1955), Princeton University Press
  61. Wagner, D. M., "The Illusion of Conscious Will" (2003), Bradford Books
  62. J.A. Walter, "Implementation of self-organizing neural networks for visuo-motor control of an industrial robot", IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 4(1), pp.86~96 (1993), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)[DOI]
  63. Wigner, E., "The Scientist Speculates", pp.284~302 (1961), Heineman
  64. Woodward, J., "Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation" (2005), Oxford University Press
  65. W. H. Zurek, "Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical-Revisited", Los Alamos Science, 27(86) (2002)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)