본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

평가 개선을 위한 문항 분석에 관한 연구 - 고등학교 일본어 정기고사를 중심으로 -

A Study of Analysis of Problems for Better Evaluation - With Emphasis on Regular Exams on High School Japanese -

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This year is a big turning point for High School Japanese education. This is the first year of national-level standards of achievement to apply the new evaluation system based on achievement instead the existing relative evaluation system of nine grades. Facing a major transition with a new evaluation system, it was necessary to observe the evaluation of Japanese subject to suggest new directions for the evaluation. This study, in particular, analyzed and interpreted the actual problems of regular high school exams and discussed whether it would be necessary to analyze these examines afterwards. As a result of applying the ‘evaluation result analysis program for each level of achievement’ to the 25 multiple-choice problems to display and interpret the data, it was possible to discover problems that have issues in terms of difficulty and discrimination and provide analysis and feedback on them to identify what the learners were lacking and what the teachers were wrong about the students. It is truly important to analyze the problems, understand the definition of related terms, and identify the numerical information contained in the files derived from the program. What comes after the analysis of problems with even greater importance is the teaching/learning process that comes after the analysis and the feedback of evaluation. For example, it is necessary to analyze the problems that have a big gap with the anticipated rate of correct answers, whose rate of correct answers is too low, and whose level of discrimination is too low to evaluate the students' achievement for future classes. This would be a shortcut to the vital circulation of overall process of teaching and learning.

Abstract

This year is a big turning point for High School Japanese education. This is the first year of national-level standards of achievement to apply the new evaluation system based on achievement instead the existing relative evaluation system of nine grades. Facing a major transition with a new evaluation system, it was necessary to observe the evaluation of Japanese subject to suggest new directions for the evaluation. This study, in particular, analyzed and interpreted the actual problems of regular high school exams and discussed whether it would be necessary to analyze these examines afterwards. As a result of applying the ‘evaluation result analysis program for each level of achievement’ to the 25 multiple-choice problems to display and interpret the data, it was possible to discover problems that have issues in terms of difficulty and discrimination and provide analysis and feedback on them to identify what the learners were lacking and what the teachers were wrong about the students. It is truly important to analyze the problems, understand the definition of related terms, and identify the numerical information contained in the files derived from the program. What comes after the analysis of problems with even greater importance is the teaching/learning process that comes after the analysis and the feedback of evaluation. For example, it is necessary to analyze the problems that have a big gap with the anticipated rate of correct answers, whose rate of correct answers is too low, and whose level of discrimination is too low to evaluate the students' achievement for future classes. This would be a shortcut to the vital circulation of overall process of teaching and learning.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "성취수준별 평가결과 분석 프로그램" (2015)[URL]
  2. 교육부, "학생의 성취도 파악을 위한 평가결과 분석 이렇게 하세요", 한국교육과정평가원 홍보자료 PIM 2015-2-1, ~ (2015)
  3. 박도순, "문항작성방법론", pp.7~46 (2000), 교육과학사
  4. 성태제, "문항제작 및 분석의 이론과 실제", pp.193~312 (2006), 학지사
  5. 손민정, "고등학교 성취평가제 운영의 실제 -제2외국어-", 한국교육과정평가원 연구자료 ORM 2013-85-12, ~ (2013)
  6. 윤선애, "교원업무경감을 위한 교무행정업무 지원인력 활용 사례", 석사, 교육행정전공, pp.2014
  7. 市嶋典子, "日本語教育における評価と「実践研究」-対話的アセスメント:価値の衝突と共有のプロセス", pp.7~35 (2014), 株式会社ココ出版
  8. 尾崎茂, "言語テスト学入門-テスト作成の基本概念と教授法", pp.13~24 (2008), 大学教育出版
  9. 辰野千壽, "教育評価事典", pp.543~544 (2006), 図書文化社
  10. 谷誠司, "日本語テストの分析と新しいテストの開発", 博士, pp.2007
  11. トムソン木下千尋, "海外の日本語教育の現場における評価-自己評価の活用と学習者主導型評価の提案", 日本語教育, (136), pp.27~37 (2008), 日本語教育学会
  12. 日本語教育学会, "新版日本語教育事典", pp.786~787 (2006), 大修館書店

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)