김명순에 대한 두 개의 진단과 김명순 소설의 존재방식

Abstract

Many writers criticized Kim Myung-soon and her work. These criticisms were mainly harsh, and the worst of them was the ones of Yong Sang-Sup and Kim Ki-jin. They made a diagnosis of nervousness and hysteria about her novel. This diagnosis was not only about Kim Myung-soon's works but also about herself. The pathological diagnosis of nervousness and hysteria meant that this work and the writer were abnormal. What was the premise of such a confident diagnosis of Yoon Sang-Sup and Kim Ki-jin? The criticism of 'causeless result' or 'endlessness' in Kim Myung-soon' s novel was based on the importance of causality in narrative. A well-organized causal relationship was one of the main factors for the reader to effectively engage in the text and to build a sense of reality in which the world of text became prevalent, while at the same time predicting the concept of modern novels with an emphasis on completeness. The concept of this modern novel has been strengthened and universalized through the system of monthly reviews, literature introduction, discussion, and literary works in magazines. The flare of the emotions revealed by Kim Myung-soon's novels was perceived to be negative in that it would offend the people with whom they are sharing and which they share. Communities share emotions about objects that are generally considered good. This is an important condition for maintaining the community. This condition was especially necessary for the modern nation or class. As Benedict Anderson appropriately points out, modern novels have emerged as a representative genre of modern literature as a medium to effectively perform such a role. Kim Myung-soon and his novel rejected the notion that it was a modern novel shared by the literary circle in Joseon at the time, but was not influenced by the common values ​​and emotions of the nation or class. As a result, she became a stranger of modern literary circle, the class and the nation through such a way of writing.