본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Students’ Perceptions of Assignments and Feedback in an Online English Composition Course

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of the present study is to investigate students’ perspectives on writing assignments and feedback in an online English composition course, specifically addressing the questions of how students perceive writing assignments, feedback, and discussion forums, and of what strategies can be used to promote effective feedback. In order to examine these issues, an online questionnaire was administered and an informal group interview was conducted. The questionnaire was completed by 104 EFL students at Cyber H University, and four of these students participated in the group interview. The results showed that the students’ views of the online composition course were very positive. A majority of the students indicated that the assignments and feedback were extremely helpful for the improvement of their English writing skills, as was participation in discussion forums. However, it was suggested that clearer directions about assignments needed to be provided. In addition, the students mentioned that feedback should be more consistent, and error corrections should be accompanied with clear explanations, examples, and encouraging comments. For consistent and high quality feedback, training sessions are suggested for instructors and tutors. Furthermore, an individualized and interactive process through face-to-face meetings, phone calls, or videoconferencing can be incorporated into online composition courses.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate students’ perspectives on writing assignments and feedback in an online English composition course, specifically addressing the questions of how students perceive writing assignments, feedback, and discussion forums, and of what strategies can be used to promote effective feedback. In order to examine these issues, an online questionnaire was administered and an informal group interview was conducted. The questionnaire was completed by 104 EFL students at Cyber H University, and four of these students participated in the group interview. The results showed that the students’ views of the online composition course were very positive. A majority of the students indicated that the assignments and feedback were extremely helpful for the improvement of their English writing skills, as was participation in discussion forums. However, it was suggested that clearer directions about assignments needed to be provided. In addition, the students mentioned that feedback should be more consistent, and error corrections should be accompanied with clear explanations, examples, and encouraging comments. For consistent and high quality feedback, training sessions are suggested for instructors and tutors. Furthermore, an individualized and interactive process through face-to-face meetings, phone calls, or videoconferencing can be incorporated into online composition courses.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Achtmeier, S., "Considerations for developing evaluations of online courses", Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), pp.1~13 (2003)
  2. Badger, R., "A process genre approach to teaching writing", ELT Journal, 54(2), pp.153~160 (2000)
  3. Blake, R., "The use of technology for second language distance learning", The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), pp.822~835 (2009)
  4. Boyd, P. W., "Analyzing students’ perceptions of their learning in online and hybrid first-year composition courses", Computers and Composition, 25(2), pp.224~243 (2008)
  5. Brice, D., "ESL writers’ reactions to teacher commentary: A case study", Paper presented at the 30th Annual TESOL Convention (1995)
  6. Bullen, M., "Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education", Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), pp.1~32 (1998)
  7. 조수근, "온라인 영작문 강의에서 상호작용을 활성화시키는 방안에 대한 연구", 언어연구, 27(1), pp.19~39 (2010), 언어정보연구소
  8. Cohen, A. D., "Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports, In Second language writing", pp.155~177 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  9. Curran, C., "Online learning and the university, In Economics of distance and online learning: Theory, practice, and research", pp.26~51 (2008), Routledge
  10. Diab, R. L., "Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about responding to ESL writing: A case study", TESL Canada Journal, 23(1), pp.28~43 (2005)
  11. Fathman, A. K., "Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content, In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.178~190 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  12. Ferris, D. R., "Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms", TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), pp.33~53 (1995)
  13. Ferris, D. R., "Response to student writing: Implications for second language students" (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  14. Ferris, D. R., "Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers", Journal of Second Language Writing (2012)
  15. Fregeau, L. A., "Preparing ESL students for college writing: Two case studies", The Internet TESL Journal, 5(10) (1999)
  16. Frodesen, J., "Grammar in writing, In Teaching English as a second or foreign language", pp.233~248 (2001), Heinle and Heinle
  17. Goldberg, A., "The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002", The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), pp.1~52 (2003)
  18. Hedgcock, J., "Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2), pp.141~163 (1994)
  19. Hedgcock, J., "Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing", Modern Language Journal, 80(3), pp.287~308 (1996)
  20. Lee, I., "Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), pp.144~164 (2008)
  21. Leki, I., "The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes", Foreign Language Annals, 24, pp.203~218 (1991)
  22. McKeage, K., "Office hours as you like them: Integrating real-time chats into the course media mix", College Teaching, 49(1), pp.32~38 (2001)
  23. Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. ASHE-ERIC higher education report, Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series, "Meyer, K.", Jossey-Bass, ~ (2002)
  24. Meyer, K., "Face to face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking", Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), pp.55~65 (2003)
  25. Muncie, J., "Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes", ELT Journal, 54(1), pp.47~53 (2000)
  26. Neuhauser, C., "Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction", The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), pp.99~113 (2002)
  27. Northrup, P. T., "Online learners’ preferences for interaction", The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), pp.219~226 (2002)
  28. O’Dowd, R., "Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange", ELT Journal, 61(2), pp.144~152 (2007)
  29. O’Reilly, M., "Interaction online: Above and beyond requirements of assessment", Australian Journal of Technology, 18(1), pp.461~470 (2002)
  30. Palm, L. J., "A comparison of learning outcomes in web-based and traditional lecture format introductory sociology courses", Bridges, 1, pp.30~39 (2007)
  31. Picciano, A., "Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course", Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), pp.21~39 (2002)
  32. Rivera, J., "A comparison of student outcomes and satisfaction between traditional & web based course offerings", Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5, pp.1~12 (2002)
  33. Rovai, A. P., "Building sense of community at a distance", International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1) (2002)
  34. Russell, G., "Virtual schools and educational futures", Educational Technology, 41(6), pp.55~57 (2001)
  35. Saito, H., "Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners", TESL Canada Journal, 11, pp.46~70 (1994)
  36. Sapp, D. A., "Utilizing online office hours to maximize faculty-student contact in the technical writing classroom", Paper presented at the convention of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association (2003)
  37. Sapp, D. A., "Comparing grades in online and face-to-face writing courses: Interpersonal accountability and institutional commitment", Computers and Composition, 22(4), pp.471~489 (2005)
  38. Sherry, L., "Issues in distance learning", International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, pp.337~365 (1996)
  39. Spitzer, D. R., "Don’t forget the high-touch with the high-tech in distance learning", Educational Technology, 41(2), pp.51~55 (2001)
  40. Swan, K., "Learning effectiveness: What the research tells us, In Elements of quality online education", pp.13~45 (2003), Sloane Center for Online Education
  41. Tribble, C., "Writing" (1996), Oxford University Press
  42. Tuzi, F., "The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course", Computers and Composition, 21, pp.217~235 (2004)
  43. Yang, M., "A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class", Journal of Second language Writing, 15, pp.179~200 (2006)
  44. Young, S., "Online instruction: New roles for teachers and students", Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(4), pp.11~16 (2001)
  45. Zhang, S., "Re-examining the affective advantages of peer feedback in the ESL writing classroom", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, pp.209~222 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)