로제마 감독의 『맨스필드 파크』 : 페미니즘과 탈식민주의의 영향
Patricia Rosema’s Mansfield Park: An Influence of Feminism and Post-colonialism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, I analyze Canadian director Patricia Rozema’s 1999 film adaptation of Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park. By including elements of feminism and post-colonialism in her adaptation, Rozema changed three important aspects of Austen’s novel. I offer an analysis of the film in light of those changes. The film version turns Fanny Price from the shy, diffident, and quiet heroine of the novel whose love for Edmund goes unrequited to an intelligent, active, and 1990s politically-aware attitude girl who enjoys Edmund’s reciprocated love. This change weakens Austen’s main theme of Fanny’s growth from a shy girl to a lady of Mansfield Park. The film version also changes two important rejections in the novel: Fanny’s rejection of the performance of Lover’s Vows and her rejection of Henry’s marriage proposal. Since these two rejections in the novel suggested Fanny’s moral victory and also her proper judgment of Henry’s past immorality and dissipation, the film’s changes blur the meaning and importance of these two episodes. Finally, Rozema’s film version offers a postcolonial critique of Sir Thomas who owns sugar plantations in Antigua, turning him into a greasy character, a colonizing instigator, and a kind of slave holder of Fanny. Austen’s Sir Thomas who has some problems in the education of his sons and daughters, is a responsible family head. In the novel, he adopted Fanny to protect his sons from a would-be marriage between cousins, but by the end, declares Fanny to be his real daughter; his awakening paralleled Fanny’s development. Rozema’s changes underscore postcolonial critiques in the novel, but by overemphasizing those elements, the film suffers. In my analysis, I conclude that Rozema’s feminist and postcolonial spin on Austen’s novel weaken Austen’s core themes of the growth and awakening of both Fanny and Sir Thomas, however fast-paced and interesting the final product.
Abstract
In this article, I analyze Canadian director Patricia Rozema’s 1999 film adaptation of Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park. By including elements of feminism and post-colonialism in her adaptation, Rozema changed three important aspects of Austen’s novel. I offer an analysis of the film in light of those changes. The film version turns Fanny Price from the shy, diffident, and quiet heroine of the novel whose love for Edmund goes unrequited to an intelligent, active, and 1990s politically-aware attitude girl who enjoys Edmund’s reciprocated love. This change weakens Austen’s main theme of Fanny’s growth from a shy girl to a lady of Mansfield Park. The film version also changes two important rejections in the novel: Fanny’s rejection of the performance of Lover’s Vows and her rejection of Henry’s marriage proposal. Since these two rejections in the novel suggested Fanny’s moral victory and also her proper judgment of Henry’s past immorality and dissipation, the film’s changes blur the meaning and importance of these two episodes. Finally, Rozema’s film version offers a postcolonial critique of Sir Thomas who owns sugar plantations in Antigua, turning him into a greasy character, a colonizing instigator, and a kind of slave holder of Fanny. Austen’s Sir Thomas who has some problems in the education of his sons and daughters, is a responsible family head. In the novel, he adopted Fanny to protect his sons from a would-be marriage between cousins, but by the end, declares Fanny to be his real daughter; his awakening paralleled Fanny’s development. Rozema’s changes underscore postcolonial critiques in the novel, but by overemphasizing those elements, the film suffers. In my analysis, I conclude that Rozema’s feminist and postcolonial spin on Austen’s novel weaken Austen’s core themes of the growth and awakening of both Fanny and Sir Thomas, however fast-paced and interesting the final product.
참고문헌 (23)
- 조선정, "여성의 성숙과 교육--제인 오스틴의 『맨스필드 파크 』 읽기", 영어영문학, 52(4), pp.835~859 (2006), 한국영어영문학회
- 한애경, "제인 오스틴과 페미니즘: 맨스필드 파크", 근대영미소설, 7(2), pp.231~254 (2000)
- 황정아, "맨스필드 파크", 문학과 영화, pp.101~112
- Fraiman, Susan, "Jane Austen and Edward Said: Gender, Culture, and Imperialism", Critical Inquiry, 21(4), pp.805~821 (1995)
- Halperin, John, "The Novelist as Heroine in Mansfield Park: A Study in Autobiography", Modern Language Quarterly, 44(2), pp.136~156 (1983)
- Hollis, Patricia, "Women in Public,1850-1900" (1979), George Allen & Unwin
- Hudson, Glenda A, "Incestuous Relationships: Mansfield Park Revisited", EighteenthCentury Fiction, 4(1), pp.53~68 (1991)
- Kirkham, Margaret, "Feminism and Fiction" (1997), Athlone
- Lenta, Margaret, "Androgyny and Authority in Mansfield Park", Studies in the Novel, 15(3), pp.169~182 (1983)
- Lewis, C.S, "Two Solitary Heroines, In Critics on Jane Austen" (1976), George Allen & Unwin
- MacCarthy, G. G, "The Female Pen: Women Writers and Novelists 1621-1818" (1994), Cork UP
- Palsa, Carl, "‘What was done there is not to be told’: Mansfield Park’s Colonial Unconscious, In Textual Politics from Slavery to Post-colonialism", pp.32~59 (2000), St. Martin’s
- Said, Edward, "Jane Austen and Empire, In Culture and Imperialism", pp.80~97 (1993), Vintage
- Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, "In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics" (1987), Methuen
- Trilling, Lionell, "The Opposing Self:Nine Essays in Criticism" (1978), Harcourt
