본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

감성, 섹슈얼러티, 몸: 『오만과 편견』 원작과 각색 작품 비교

Sensibility, Sexuality, Body: the Comparison between Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice and its two Adaptations

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The keywords to distinguish Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice from its two adaptations (the 1995 BBC mini-series and the 2005 film) are sensibility, sexuality, and body. In contrast to Austen’s Pride and Prejudice which is a reaction against the cult of sensibility and a reassertion of a rational rather than emotional construction of both character and reader, its two adaptations show masculine emotional display and sexuality. The 1995 BBC mini-series adds many invented scenes through which Darcy’s struggle with his passion is depicted. The 2005 feature film extends the concentration on sexuality of the 1995 mini-series. It shows the sexual attraction between Darcy and Elizabeth and the process of Elizabeth's sexual awakening in the dimension of ‘body’. These changes to Austen’s text are made for the differing tastes of the modern audience. The 1995 BBC version is attuned to the sensibilities of a 1995 audience and fulfills its viewers’ desire to see male hero suffer from his passion. The 2005 film version is influenced by the twenty-first century assumption that the needs and desires of the individual take precedence over other values. It focuses primarily on Elizabeth’s own emotional journey and her maturation plot, deploying sexuality as a mainspring of narrative action. These two adaptations offer the creative reinterpretation of the original text. While Austen has a narrator mock the excessive sentimentality of characters to condone a restraint of emotion and the balance between sense and sensibility, its two adaptations make an effective use of cinematography, visual symbolism, and other filming techniques to focus on sensibility, sexuality, and body. The comparison between the original text and its adaptations enables us to read cultural code of the times when they are written and produced. It leads us to appreciate the various new interpretations of the original text and to understand the new way in which the director appropriates the hidden sub-text for his/her own ends.

Abstract

The keywords to distinguish Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice from its two adaptations (the 1995 BBC mini-series and the 2005 film) are sensibility, sexuality, and body. In contrast to Austen’s Pride and Prejudice which is a reaction against the cult of sensibility and a reassertion of a rational rather than emotional construction of both character and reader, its two adaptations show masculine emotional display and sexuality. The 1995 BBC mini-series adds many invented scenes through which Darcy’s struggle with his passion is depicted. The 2005 feature film extends the concentration on sexuality of the 1995 mini-series. It shows the sexual attraction between Darcy and Elizabeth and the process of Elizabeth's sexual awakening in the dimension of ‘body’. These changes to Austen’s text are made for the differing tastes of the modern audience. The 1995 BBC version is attuned to the sensibilities of a 1995 audience and fulfills its viewers’ desire to see male hero suffer from his passion. The 2005 film version is influenced by the twenty-first century assumption that the needs and desires of the individual take precedence over other values. It focuses primarily on Elizabeth’s own emotional journey and her maturation plot, deploying sexuality as a mainspring of narrative action. These two adaptations offer the creative reinterpretation of the original text. While Austen has a narrator mock the excessive sentimentality of characters to condone a restraint of emotion and the balance between sense and sensibility, its two adaptations make an effective use of cinematography, visual symbolism, and other filming techniques to focus on sensibility, sexuality, and body. The comparison between the original text and its adaptations enables us to read cultural code of the times when they are written and produced. It leads us to appreciate the various new interpretations of the original text and to understand the new way in which the director appropriates the hidden sub-text for his/her own ends.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 고영란, "보편적인 진리”와 개인적 “감정”의 변증법적 합과 서술방법: '오만과 편견' 연구", 근대영미소설, 14(2), pp.5~33 (2007)
  2. Austen, Jane, "Pride and Prejudice" (1966), Norton
  3. Belton, Ellen, "Jane Austen on Screen. Eds. Gina Macdonald & Andrew Macdonald", pp.175~195 (2003), Cambridge UP
  4. Birtwhistle, Sue, "“A Conversation with Colin Firth.” Pride and? Prejudice", pp.384~388 (2001), Norton
  5. Camden, Jen, "Sex and the Scullery: The New Pride & Prejudice", Persuasions On-line, 27(2), pp.1~8 (2007)
  6. Dole, Carol M, "Jane Austen and Mud: Pride & Prejudice (2005), British Realism, and the Heritage Film", Persuasions On-line, 27(2), pp.1~9 (2007)
  7. Ellington, Elisabeth H, "“A Correct Taste in Landscape: Pemberley as Fetish and? Commodity.” Jane Austen in Hollywood", pp.90~110 (2001), UP of Kentucky
  8. Reading the Film, "Jane Austen in the Classroom: Viewing the Novel", pp.2004, Flavin, Louise
  9. Gros, Emmeline, "Fidelity to Jane Austen's Narrator in Joe Wright's Pride & Prejudice", Persuasions On-line, 27(2), pp.1~10 (2007)
  10. Hopkins, Lisa, "“Mr. Darcy's Body: Privileging the Female Gaze.” Jane Austen in? Hollywood", pp.111~121 (2001), UP of Kentucky
  11. Martin, Lydia, "Joe Wright's Pride & Prejudice: From Classicism to Romanticism", Persuasions On-line, 27(2), pp.1~5 (2007)
  12. Nixon, Cheryl L, "“Balancing the Courtship Hero: Masculine Emotional Display in? Film Adaptations of Austen's Novels.” Jane Austen in Hollywood", pp.22~43 (2001), UP of Kentucky
  13. Oodman, Allegra, "Pemberley previsited", American Scholar, 73(2), pp.142~145 (2004)
  14. Paquet-Deyris, Anne-Marie, "Staging Intimacy and Interiority in Joe Wright's Pride & Prejudice (2005)", Persuasions On-line, 27(2), pp.1~9 (2007)
  15. Stewart-Beer, Catherine, "Style over Substance Pride & Prejudice (2005) Itself a? Film for Our Time", Persuasions On-line, 27(2), pp.1~8 (2007)
  16. Van Ghent, Dorothy, "On Pride and Prejudice :The English Novel: Form and Function", pp.99~111 (1953), Harper Torchbooks
  17. Simon Langton, "Pride and Prejudice", pp.1995, BBC
  18. Joe Wright, "Pride & Prejudice" (2005), Focus Features

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)