본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

불교와 이슬람의 불균형 공존: 태국 쁘라윳 짠오차 정부의 사례를 중심으로

Unbalanced Coexistence of Buddhism and Islam- Focusing on the case of Prayut Chan-o-cha government in Thailand

옹지인
한국태국학회 (Korean Association Of Thai Studies)|2023.02|한국태국학회논총 (JOURNAL OF KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF THAI STUDIES)|제29권 제2호|pp. 29-54|DOI 10.22473/kats.2023.29.2.002

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Religion Policy종교 정책태국의 종교태국의 불교태국의 이슬람쁘라윳 짠오차Religion in ThailandBuddhism in ThailandIslam in ThailandPrayut Chan-o-cha
주제분류지역학

초록

This study examines how Buddhism and Islam coexist in Thai society under the Prayuth regime by using combination of literature research and field research methods. The Prayuth government specified that it would take an anti-secular line to solve the problems of modern Thai society, but the government policy announced to enhance national morality had little relevance to religion, and rather activities that emphasized the philosophy of sufficient economy were more A lot has been done. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister's order for religious support was aimed at emphasizing that Muslims must live in harmony in a Buddhist-dominated Thai society. On the other hand, Buddhists were relatively indifferent to the doctrines and ways of life of other religions, and did not fully recognize the need to embrace minority religions. Although most Muslims complied with the Prayut government's policy, there were voices that protested that true harmony can be achieved only when some majority efforts are made together. As long as the Prayuth government continues, the anti-secular line will continue, and Buddhism and Islam will still have to coexist in an imbalanced state in Thai society. However, peaceful harmony between the majority and the minority can be achieved if the government listens to the two-way harmony that is being talked about in Muslim societies and formulates and applies policies and plans.

Abstract

This study examines how Buddhism and Islam coexist in Thai society under the Prayuth regime by using combination of literature research and field research methods. The Prayuth government specified that it would take an anti-secular line to solve the problems of modern Thai society, but the government policy announced to enhance national morality had little relevance to religion, and rather activities that emphasized the philosophy of sufficient economy were more A lot has been done. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister's order for religious support was aimed at emphasizing that Muslims must live in harmony in a Buddhist-dominated Thai society. On the other hand, Buddhists were relatively indifferent to the doctrines and ways of life of other religions, and did not fully recognize the need to embrace minority religions. Although most Muslims complied with the Prayut government's policy, there were voices that protested that true harmony can be achieved only when some majority efforts are made together. As long as the Prayuth government continues, the anti-secular line will continue, and Buddhism and Islam will still have to coexist in an imbalanced state in Thai society. However, peaceful harmony between the majority and the minority can be achieved if the government listens to the two-way harmony that is being talked about in Muslim societies and formulates and applies policies and plans.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Albritton, R. B., "Thailand in 2004 : The"Crisis in the south"", Asian Survey, 45(1), pp.166~173 (2005)
  2. Chan, A., "Thailand", Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 6(1), pp.7~8 (2014)
  3. Chapman, C., "Christian Responses to Islamism and violence in the name of Islam", Transformation, 34(2), pp.115~130 (2017)
  4. Cho, H., "Thai-Malay conflicts in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries", International Area Review, 2(2), pp.47~68 (1999)
  5. Situation Report Violent Incidents in Southern Thaliand, "Patani. (No. Quarter 3, 2018)", Deep South Watch, 2018
  6. Federspiel, H. M., "Islam and Development in the Nations of ASEAN", Asian Survey, 25(8), pp.805~821 (1985)
  7. Forbes, A. D. W., "Thailand's Muslim Minorities: Assimilation, Secession, or Coexistence?", Asian Survey, 22(11), pp.1056~1073 (1982)
  8. Houben, V. J. H., "Southeast Asia and Islam", The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 588(1), pp.149~170 (2003)
  9. Kam, S., "Thailand", Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 8(1), pp.32~36 (2016)
  10. Mortimer, E., "Christianity and Islam", International Affairs, 67(1), pp.7~13 (1991)
  11. Schantz, B., "Islam in Europe : Threat or Challenge to Christianity", Missiology, 21(4), pp.443~454 (1993)[DOI]
  12. Scupin, R., "The politics of Islamic reformism in Thailand", Asian Survey, 20(12), pp.1223~1235 (1980)
  13. Serafim, A., "Terrorism-A cultural phenomenon", Connections, 4(1), pp.61~74 (2005)
  14. Steiner, K., "Images of Muslims and Islam in Swedish Christian and Secular News Discourse", Media, War & Conflict, 8(1), pp.20~45 (2015)
  15. Tan-Mullins, M., "Armed Conflict and Resolutions in Southern Thailand", Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(5), pp.922~931 (2009)
  16. Viviano, R. S., "Benedict XVI, Islam and Christian-Muslim relations", The Downside Review, 135(1), pp.55~75 (2016)
  17. 김규식, "태국 남부지역주민들의 정치인식과 정치참여에 관한연구(ทัศนะต่อข่าวสารทางการเมืองกับการมีส่วนร่วมทางการเมืองของประชาชนใน 3 จัวหวัดชายแดนภาคใต้)", 한국태국학회논총, 9, pp.181~232 (2002)
  18. 김규식, "태국 남부 무슬림 사회에 대한 교육정책과 영향(남부 국경지역을 중심으로)", 한국태국학회논총, 21(2), pp.245~283 (2015), 한국태국학회[DOI]
  19. 김홍구, "한국의 태국 연구: 동향과 과제", 아시아리뷰, 6(2), pp.298~336 (2017), 아시아연구소[DOI]
  20. 박은홍, "타이 남부문제와 시민사회의 대응: 인권의 관점", 동남아시아연구, 17(2), pp.173~205 (2007), 한국동남아학회[DOI]
  21. 옹지인, "코로나-19 팬데믹 시대의 태국 내 불교 활동과 국가의 지원", 한국태국학회논총, 29(1), pp.57~90 (2022), 한국태국학회[DOI]
  22. 옹지인, "헌법과 승가법의 개정을 통한 세속 권력의 종교 개입", 한국태국학회논총, 28(2), pp.241~272 (2022), 한국태국학회[DOI]
  23. 이동윤, "동남아의 분리주의와 갈등관리의 정치적 동학：태국과 필리핀의 사례 비교", 분쟁해결연구, 9(3), pp.153~185 (2011), 분쟁해결연구센터[DOI]
  24. 이병도, "태국 남부 이슬람지역의 유혈사태에 관한 연구", 국제지역연구, 9(4), pp.153~188 (2006), 국제지역연구센터
  25. 전호진, "동남아시아 이슬람 급진주의 운동고찰", 복음과 선교, 31(3), pp.91~130 (2015), 한국복음주의선교신학회
  26. 정환승, "태국 남부 지역 갈등과 이슬람 문화", 국제지역연구, 14(2), pp.355~372 (2010), 국제지역연구센터
  27. 정환승, "태국 남부지역 갈등과 무슬림 대학생들의 의식조사", 국제지역연구, 16(2), pp.95~119 (2012), 국제지역연구센터[DOI]
  28. 한아세안센터, "2018 한아세안센터 통계집" (2019), 한아세안센터 정보자료국
  29. 홍석준, "말레이 무슬림 정체성의 역동적 성격: 말레이시아 끌란딴(Kelantan)과 태국 빠따니(Patani)의 말레이사회에 대한 비교연구", 동남아시아연구, 13(1), pp.101~129 (2003), 한국동남아학회
  30. "Committee for National Moral Promotion", กรมการศาสนา กระทรวงวัฒนธรรม, ~ (2016)
  31. "Department of Religious Affairs", กรมการศาสนา กระทรวงวัฒนธรรม, ~ (2016)
  32. "Department of Religious Affairs", ~ (2021)
  33. Department of Religious Affairs, "Department of Religious Affairs (กรมการศาสนา)" (2008), โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย จำกัด
  34. , 2018
  35. National Intelligence Agency, (2022), National Intelligence Agency
  36. "National Statistics of Office of Thailand", Statistical Forecasting Division National Statistical Office, The Government Complex, ~ (2020)
  37. "Parliamentary Budget Office", สำนักงบประมาณของรัฐสภาสำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาผู้แทนราษฎร, ~ (2020)
  38. "Parliamentary Budget Office", สำนักงบประมาณของรัฐสภา สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาผู้แทนราษฎร, ~ (2022)
  39. "Deep South Watch.Deep south watch home page"[URL]
  41. "Sheikhul islam office (สำนักงานจุฬาราชมนตรี)home page"[URL]
  42. "National Intelligent Agency"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

코로나-19 팬데믹 시대의 태국 내 불교 활동과 국가의 지원옹지인한국태국학회 · 한국태국학회논총2022 · 제29권 제1호미얀마의 무슬림과 종교 분쟁: 국민통합을 중심으로장준영동남아연구소 · 동남아연구2015 · 제24권 제3호태국의 다문화주의에 관한 연구 -동질성에서 다양성으로-이병도한국태국학회 · 한국태국학회논총2020 · 제26권 제2호태국의 테러리즘에 관한 연구 -반테러리즘과 해결 방안을 중심으로-이태훈한국태국학회 · 한국태국학회논총2021 · 제27권 제2호태국 남부 무슬림 사회에 대한 교육정책과 영향(남부 국경지역을 중심으로)김규식한국태국학회 · 한국태국학회논총2015 · 제21권 제2호헌법과 승가법의 개정을 통한 세속 권력의 종교 개입옹지인한국태국학회 · 한국태국학회논총2022 · 제28권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

태국어 의문문의 간접화행에 관한 연구윤경원pp. 1-28‘타이식 민주주의’와 대중들의 정치적 인식서경교pp. 55-82태국 아유타야 왕국과 라오스 란쌍 왕국 관계 연구이병도pp. 83-104코로나19 이후 GMS(Greater Mekong Subregion) 관광산업 전략과 한-GMS 관광 협력방안이문경, 이요한pp. 105-142태국 대중음악 룩퉁에 나타난 연애관 연구이지은pp. 143-176
원문 보기