영어와 한국어 종결성 인식 비교: 명사구의 한정성을 중심으로
A Comparative Analysis of Telicity Perception of English and Korean: Focusing on the Definiteness of Noun Phrases
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to investigate how Korean English learners and native English speakers perceive telicity in English and Korean. Two hundred and forty-one Korean English learners and thirty seven native English speakers participated in this study. Two types of telicity experiment(a reading test and a writing test) were conducted on native English speakers and three groups of Korean English learners who were classified by their English proficiency. The results of the study showed how Korean English learners and native speakers distinguish the difference depending on the noun phrase types, and showed that the way most Korean English speakers interpret the English verb phrases is influenced by the Korean language. In addition, Korean learners in the beginner group have more difficulty acquiring English verb phrases by the definiteness of noun phrases. The findings of the study are discussed along with relevant studies.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate how Korean English learners and native English speakers perceive telicity in English and Korean. Two hundred and forty-one Korean English learners and thirty seven native English speakers participated in this study. Two types of telicity experiment(a reading test and a writing test) were conducted on native English speakers and three groups of Korean English learners who were classified by their English proficiency. The results of the study showed how Korean English learners and native speakers distinguish the difference depending on the noun phrase types, and showed that the way most Korean English speakers interpret the English verb phrases is influenced by the Korean language. In addition, Korean learners in the beginner group have more difficulty acquiring English verb phrases by the definiteness of noun phrases. The findings of the study are discussed along with relevant studies.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김천학, "동사와 상에 관한 유형론적 연구 -한국어의 완망상과 비완망상에 대하여-", 한국어학, 57, pp.179~206 (2012), 한국어학회
- 김천학, "한국어 동사의 종결성(telicity)에 대한 연구", 언어와 정보 사회, 21, pp.23~51 (2014), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 노명현, "영어와 국어의 결과구문 연구", 현대영미어문학, 25(4), pp.119~146 (2007), 현대영미어문학회
- 노명현, "영한 동사의 종결상 연구", 현대영미어문학, 32(4), pp.103~126 (2014), 현대영미어문학회
- 박기성, "영어와 한국어의 총칭성에 관한 대조 분석", 코기코, 55, pp.271~302 (2009)
- 박덕유, "한국어의 相이해(Understanding of Korean Aspects)" (2009), 제이앤씨
- 이정민, "(비)한정성", (불)특정성 화제, 1992, pp.22, 392~424
- 임덕성, "제 2언어 자아체계에서 본 한국대학생의 영어 학습동기와 능력", 중등영어교육, 8(2), pp.79~102 (2015), 한국중등영어교육학회
- Hae Jin Jang, "Acquisition on telicity of English article the by Korean speakers", 석사, Dept. of English Language and Literature, pp.2013
- 전영철, "한국어 총칭표현들의 의미론적 분석", 언어학, (37), pp.267~296 (2003), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 최은경, "한국 중·고등학생들의 영어 총칭 관사 및 명사구 습득 양상 연구", 석사, 영어교육전공, pp.2012
- 최정인, "한국인 영어 학습자의 영어 동사구 종결성 해석에 관한 연구: 한정사를 중심으로", 영어학, 15(4), pp.663~690 (2015), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- 최정인, "한국인 영어 학습자의 모국어 전이에 관한 연구: 영어 종결 동사를 중심으로", 영어학, 16(2), pp.285~309 (2016), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- 최정인, "한국인 영어 학습자의 영어 동사구 종결성 인식에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2018
- 현혜린, "한국인 성인 화자의 문법상 선택에 영향을 미치는 요인 : 종결성, 타동성, 주어 유정성, 장소부사에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2018
- 최정연, "EFL Koreans’ article choice across proficiency in specificity", 중등영어교육, 8(3), pp.3~25 (2015), 한국중등영어교육학회
- Eckman, Fred., "Some Principles of Second Language Phonology", Second Language Research, 19, pp.169~208 (2003)
- Gabriele, Alison, "Deriving Meaning through Context: Interpreting Bare Nominals in L2 Japanese", Second Language Research, 26, pp.379~405 (2010)
- Galasso, J., "Interference in Second Language Learning: A Review of the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis", pp.2002
- Kaku-MacDonald, Keiko, "Acquisition of Telicity in L2: A Psycholinguistic Study of Japanese Learners of English", Ph.D, pp.2009
- 김정태, "Korean EFL Learners' Acquisition of Telicity in Locatum Structures", 영어학연구, 21(3), pp.165~185 (2015), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
- Krifka, Manfred., "Semantics and Contextual Expressions", pp.75~115 (1989), Foris Publication
- Lee, Ju Won., "An Intention-Based Account of Accomplishments in Korean", Ph.D., pp.2015
- Ogiela, Diane, "Interpretation of Verb Phrase Telicity: Sensitivity to Verb Type and Determiner Type", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, pp.865~875 (2014)
- 오은정, "The Acquisition and Interpretation of English Telicity by Korean Speakers", 영어학연구, 21(1), pp.79~101 (2015), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
- Pavlenko, Aneta, "Bidirectional Transfer", Applied Linguistics, 23, pp.190~214 (2002)
- Piňon, Christopher, "Adjectives and Adverbs", pp.183~219 (2008), Oxford University Press
- Slabakova, Roumyana, "L1 Transfer Revisited: the L2 Acquisition of Telicity Marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian Native Speakers", Linguistics, 38(4), pp.739~770 (2000)
- van Valin, Robert, "Syntax" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Vendler, Zeno, "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press
- Verkuyl, Henk, "A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure" (1993), Cambridge University Press
- von Stutterheim, Christiane, "EUROSLA Yearbook 3", pp.183~206 (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Whitman, Richard, "Teaching the Article in English", TESOL Quarterly, 8(3), pp.253~262 (1974)
- Yin, Bin, "Chinese Speakers’ Acquisition of Telicity in English", Selected Proceedings of the 2010 Second Language Research Forum, pp.182~198 (2010), Cascadilla Proceedings Project