본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Judgement of Telicity in English Resultative Constructions by Korean Learners of English

최정인
외국학연구소 (FOREIGN STUDIES INSTITUTE)|2019.09|외국학연구 (The Journal of Foreign Studies)|제49호|pp. 49-72|DOI 10.15755/jfs.2019..49.49

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

종결성telicity모국어 전이L1 transfer전치사구comparativesresultative constructionsprepositional phrase결과 구문비교급
주제분류기타인문학

초록

This study aims to investigate how Korean learners of English and native English speakers judge the telicity of English resultative constructions. Ninety one Korean students and eleven native speakers of English participated in this study. Evaluation of telicity using both English and Korean was implemented to both native speakers (only English) and Korean learners who were classified into two groups according to their English proficiency. The results of this study showed that judgement of the target resultative constructions among Korean learners who are in beginner group was significantly different from that of the native speakers. Especially, in contrast to both control and advanced group, the beginner group perceived all different types of resultative constructions (ordinary resultative constructions, resultative constructions with a non-end bounded prepositional phrase, resultative constructions with comparatives and pseudo-resultative constructions) as non-end bounded (atelic). In addition, the result indeed showed how native English speakers judge the telicity of English resultative constructions. Pedagogical implications and directions of further studies were presented.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how Korean learners of English and native English speakers judge the telicity of English resultative constructions. Ninety one Korean students and eleven native speakers of English participated in this study. Evaluation of telicity using both English and Korean was implemented to both native speakers (only English) and Korean learners who were classified into two groups according to their English proficiency. The results of this study showed that judgement of the target resultative constructions among Korean learners who are in beginner group was significantly different from that of the native speakers. Especially, in contrast to both control and advanced group, the beginner group perceived all different types of resultative constructions (ordinary resultative constructions, resultative constructions with a non-end bounded prepositional phrase, resultative constructions with comparatives and pseudo-resultative constructions) as non-end bounded (atelic). In addition, the result indeed showed how native English speakers judge the telicity of English resultative constructions. Pedagogical implications and directions of further studies were presented.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Barbiers, S., "Transcriptieprotocol voor de Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten" (2001), Meertens Instituut
  2. Bhatt, R., "Aspect", LSA Summer Institute, ~ (2005)
  3. Boas, H. C., "A Constructional Approach to Resultatives" (2003), CSLI Publications
  4. 최정인, "한국인 영어 학습자의 영어 동사구 종결성 해석에 관한 연구: 한정사를 중심으로", 영어학, 15(4), pp.663~690 (2015), 한국영어학회[DOI]
  5. 최정인, "한국인 영어 학습자의 모국어 전이에 관한 연구: 영어 종결 동사를 중심으로", 영어학, 16(2), pp.285~309 (2016), 한국영어학회[DOI]
  6. Choi, J., "A Study on the Perception of English Verb Phrase Telicity by Korean English Learners", PhD, pp.2018
  7. Dowty, D., "Word Meaning and Montague Grammar" (1979), Kluwer
  8. Ettlinger, M., "The Syntactic Behavior of the Resultative: Evidence for a Constructional Approach", Proceedings of 41st Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp.145~160 (2008), Chicago Linguistics Society
  9. Folli, R., "Perspectives on Aspect", pp.81~105 (2005), Springer
  10. Goldberg, A. E., "The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions", Language, 80(3), pp.532~568 (2004)
  11. Jackendoff, R., "Parts and Boundaries", Cognition, 4, pp.9~45 (1991)
  12. Kaku-MacDonald, K., "Acquisition of Telicity in L2: A Psycholinguistic Study of Japanese Learners of English", PhD, pp.2009
  13. Kim, J., "A Comparative Study between English and Korean Resultative Constructions", Language Research, 35(1), pp.57~90 (1999)
  14. Kim, S., "L1 Influence on L2 Learning of English Resultative Constructions: The Syntactic and Semantic Structure of Korean Students’ Interlanguage", PhD, pp.2016
  15. Kratzer, A., "Event Arguments: Functions and Applications", pp.177~212 (2005), Niemeyer
  16. Levin, B., "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), The MIT Press
  17. Levin, B., "Reality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern Interaction in Language and Life", pp.303~324 (2009), CSLI Publications
  18. Levinson, L., "Arguments for Pseudo-resultative Predicates", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, pp.135~182 (2010)
  19. Why Can’t We Wipe the Slate Clean? A Lexical-syntactic Approach to Resultative Constructions, "Mateu, J.", Catalan, ~, pp.Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 8 (2000)
  20. Mezhevich, I., "English Resultatives: State versus Location", Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, pp.166~177 (2003), Université du Québec à Montréal
  21. 오은정, "The Acquisition and Interpretation of English Telicity by Korean Speakers", 영어학연구, 21(1), pp.79~101 (2015), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  22. Ogiela, A, "Interpretation of Verb Phrase Telicity: Sensitivity to Verb Type and Determiner Type", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, pp.865~875 (2014)
  23. Piñon, C., "Adjectives and Adverbs", pp.183~219 (2008), OUP
  24. Rappaport Hovav, M., "An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives", Language, 77, pp.766~797 (2001)
  25. Slabakova, R., "The Parameter of Aspect in Second Language Acquisition", Second Language Research, 15, pp.283~317 (1999)
  26. Tenny, C., "Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface" (1994), Kluwer
  27. Vendler, Z., "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press
  28. Verkuyl, J. H., "A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure" (1993), Cambridge University Press
  29. Washio, R., "Resultatives, Compositionality, and Language Variation", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6, pp.1~49 (1997)
  30. Wechsler, S., "An Analysis of English Resultatives Under the Event-Argument Homomorphism Model of Telicity", Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Text Structure at the University of Texas, pp.1~17 (2001)
  31. Yun, J., "A Study on Understanding of English Resultatives by Korean EFL Learners", Master, pp.2012

관련 논문AI추천

Korean EFL Learners' Acquisition of Telicity in Locatum Structures김정태한국영어학학회 · 영어학연구2015 · 제21권 제3호영어의 결과구문 특성과 한국인의 이해도김희숙, 윤지영한국영어교과교육학회 · 영어교과교육2016 · 제15권 제3호Telicity in Korean EFL Learners’ Interlanguage신은영한국영어영문학회 · 영어영문학2024 · 제29권 제4호영어와 한국어 종결성 인식 비교: 명사구의 한정성을 중심으로최정인언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2019 · 제90호The Acquisition and Interpretation of English Telicity by Korean Speakers오은정한국영어학학회 · 영어학연구2015 · 제21권 제1호한국인 영어 학습자의 영어 동사구 종결성 인식에 관한 연구－동사의 단순과거시제를 중심으로－전지현, 최정인언어정보연구소 · 언어와 정보 사회2018 · 제33권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

기능통합적 영문독해 수업이 대학생의 영어학습 불안감과 영어학습에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향성귀복pp. 11-48韩国语副词“많이”的句法语义研究 -从與漢語表達的對應關系及对中韓国語教學的角度分析김선희, 림문연pp. 73-94語氣詞“呢”字用法考察 -以近代漢語時期語言材料爲中心-유성은, Yuan, LiQiupp. 95-116‘个’의 탈범주화와 의미 분석 ‘是个+NP’, ‘V个+AP’를 중심으로정명숙pp. 117-142러시아어의 시간성(Temporality)에 대한 소고: 명사구(Process Nouns)를 중심으로김형섭pp. 143-172
원문 보기