한 · 미 · 일 자동차기업의 환경경영전략에 관한 비교연구 -현대, GM, 도요타자동차 사례를 중심으로-
Comparison of Environmental Management Strategy in the Auto Company of Korea, America and Japan,-Focusing on Case Study in Hyundai, GM, Toyota Co.-
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Dramatic increase of social concerns on the environments has led companies to take into account environmental issues in strategic decision- making. The strategic consideration on environmental management is essential to the modern companies. This study was initiated with a research purpose to explain the level and the characteristics of corporate environmental strategy through comparing the Hyundai, GM and Toyota Motor Company. The research method adopted by this research is a case analysis. The degree of environmental management strategy was evaluated in functional sectors or value chain including the production, research and development, procurement, logistic and recycling etc. Consequently, this study could find that Toyota is the most advanced company in the level of environmental management strategy. Also there are many differences among three companies in the level and degree of environmental management strategy. Hyundai and GM did not consider environmental management in foreign subsidiaries as much as Toyota. Motor Company. Also the study find out there are actual gaps between the rhetoric and reality in environmental management strategy in Hyundai Motor Co. All companies included in this study consider importantly ISO14001 as the tool to maintain the environmental management of their companies.
Abstract
Dramatic increase of social concerns on the environments has led companies to take into account environmental issues in strategic decision- making. The strategic consideration on environmental management is essential to the modern companies. This study was initiated with a research purpose to explain the level and the characteristics of corporate environmental strategy through comparing the Hyundai, GM and Toyota Motor Company. The research method adopted by this research is a case analysis. The degree of environmental management strategy was evaluated in functional sectors or value chain including the production, research and development, procurement, logistic and recycling etc. Consequently, this study could find that Toyota is the most advanced company in the level of environmental management strategy. Also there are many differences among three companies in the level and degree of environmental management strategy. Hyundai and GM did not consider environmental management in foreign subsidiaries as much as Toyota. Motor Company. Also the study find out there are actual gaps between the rhetoric and reality in environmental management strategy in Hyundai Motor Co. All companies included in this study consider importantly ISO14001 as the tool to maintain the environmental management of their companies.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강현수, "ISO14001 환경경영체제인증획득이 기업경영성과에 미치는 영향분석", 한국생산관리학회지, 14(2), pp.63~91
- 김장환, "환경경영시스템도입이 기업의 재무성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 김장환, "환경경영시스템인증획득이 기업의 재무성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구-ISO14001 도일을 중심으로-", 회계정보연구, 23(4), pp.1~24
- 김종대, "LG화학의 환경경영전략 및 시스템에 관한 사례연구", 대한경영학회, 18(4), pp.1807~1833
- 남익현, "환경경영체제와 기업경쟁력: 유한킴벌리 사례", 경영사례연구, 38(1), pp.81~101
- 명창식, "도요타자동차와 현대자동차의 환경경영전략에 관한 비교 연구", 국제경영리뷰, 9(2), pp.135~158
- 박재흠, "자동차산업의 환경경영평가를 위한 모형구축 및 사례연구-AHP를 활용한 가중치 도출을 중심으로-", 석사, pp.2003
- 박창길, "환경경영현상의 비판적 고찰", 연세경영연구, 41(1), pp.45~70
- 박헌준, "기업의 환경성과와 재무성과간의 관계", 경영학연구, 33(5), pp.1461~1487
- 장기운, "철강산업의 환경경영활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 분석", POSRI 경영연구, 6(2), pp.46~64
- 정은재, "기업환경보고서에 기초한 환경경영성과 측정과 국내기업의 환경경영사례연구", 박사, 테크노 경영대학원, pp.2001
- 안윤기, "중소기업의 환경경영체제구축방안과 정책에 관한 연구", 환경정책, 11(1), pp.73~103
- 윤재홍, "중소기업의 환경경영에 대한 인식과 운영이 기업성과에 미치는 영향", 중소기업연구, 22(1), pp.63~91
- 이수열, "기업환경경영전략의 동태적 변화 : 수사와 실제", 박사, pp.2003
- Christie, I., "Cleaner Production on Industry" (1996), Policy Studies Institute
- Frieder Rubik, "Policy Profile: Integrated Product Policy-Between Con- ceptual and Instrumental Approachs in Europe", European Environment, 16, pp.307~320
- S.B. Banerjee, "Corporate Environmental Strategies and Actions", Mana- gement Decision, 39(1), pp.36~44
- [URL]
- [URL]
- [URL]
