본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Revisiting the persuade-constructions in Korean with empirical evidence

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Using the data-based methods of language research, this article addresses whether the seltukha-constructions (persuade-constructions) in Korean indeed undergo a control phenomenon as generally assumed and argued in the literature. As is well known, there are two essential properties of controls across languages; (i) the controllee should be co-indexed with another element in the sentence and (ii) the controllee should be silent. Focusing on these two properties, the present study provides multi-pronged data taken from corpus exploration, context-sensitive survey, and language experiment. The empirical investigation casts a doubt on the control analysis of seltukha-constructions; in particular, it is borne out that the embedded subject (controllee) of the seltukha-constructions can appear explicitly, and the embedded subject – whether it be silent or not – is not necessarily required to be co-indexed with another element in the sentence. These lead us to the conclusion that the seltukha-constructions can be accounted for by means of a pro-drop rather than a control. One remaining issue in the analysis is such that the seltukha-constructions may sound awkward if the two NPs (matrix object and embedded subject) refer to the same individual and they appear simultaneously. To account for the awkwardness, we propose the Anti-redundancy Hypothesis; i.e., two NPs referring to the same entity or having the same form tend not to appear right next to each other. The current experiment further demonstrates that the hypothesis works as a general tendency rather than a stipulation about seltukha-constructions. Building upon the empirical data, we propose that the theory of controls in Korean (and hopefully other languages) should be reexamined from the bottom up.

Abstract

Using the data-based methods of language research, this article addresses whether the seltukha-constructions (persuade-constructions) in Korean indeed undergo a control phenomenon as generally assumed and argued in the literature. As is well known, there are two essential properties of controls across languages; (i) the controllee should be co-indexed with another element in the sentence and (ii) the controllee should be silent. Focusing on these two properties, the present study provides multi-pronged data taken from corpus exploration, context-sensitive survey, and language experiment. The empirical investigation casts a doubt on the control analysis of seltukha-constructions; in particular, it is borne out that the embedded subject (controllee) of the seltukha-constructions can appear explicitly, and the embedded subject – whether it be silent or not – is not necessarily required to be co-indexed with another element in the sentence. These lead us to the conclusion that the seltukha-constructions can be accounted for by means of a pro-drop rather than a control. One remaining issue in the analysis is such that the seltukha-constructions may sound awkward if the two NPs (matrix object and embedded subject) refer to the same individual and they appear simultaneously. To account for the awkwardness, we propose the Anti-redundancy Hypothesis; i.e., two NPs referring to the same entity or having the same form tend not to appear right next to each other. The current experiment further demonstrates that the hypothesis works as a general tendency rather than a stipulation about seltukha-constructions. Building upon the empirical data, we propose that the theory of controls in Korean (and hopefully other languages) should be reexamined from the bottom up.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Choe, Hyon Sook, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI", pp.373~386 (2006), Hanshin
  2. Choi, Young-Seok, "A study of ascension constructions in Korean", PhD, pp.1988
  3. Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
  4. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  5. Backward control in Korean and Japanese, "Cormack, Annabel", University College London, 57~83, pp.University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 16 (2004)
  6. Divjak, Dagmar, "The role of lexical frequency in the acceptability of syntactic variants:Evidence from that‐clauses in Polish", Cognitive Science, 41(2), pp.354~382 (2017)
  7. Douglas Bates, "Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4", Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), pp.1~48 (2015)
  8. Duguine, Maia, "Argument ellipsis: A unitary approach to pro-drop", The Linguistic Review, 31(3-4), pp.515~549 (2017)
  9. Farkas, Donca F., "On obligatory control", Linguistics and Philosophy, 11(1), pp.27~58 (1988)
  10. Gamerschlag, Thomas, "Semantic and structural aspects of complement control in Korean", ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 47, pp.81~123 (2007)
  11. Gelman, Andrew, "Missing-data imputation", Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), pp.310~330 (2007)
  12. 허세문, "한국어 결과구문 연구 : 사건 구조를 중심으로", 석사, 언어학, pp.2004
  13. Hornstein, Norbert, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
  14. Hornstein, Norbert, "Minimalist syntax", pp.6~81 (2003), Blackwell
  15. Jackendoff, Ray, "The semantic basis of control in English", Language, 79(3), pp.517~556 (2003)
  16. 김종복, "On the Syntax of the It-Cleft Construction: A Construction-based Perspective", 언어연구, 29(1), pp.45~68 (2012), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  17. Kim, Kyung-An, "Causativity in Korean - syntactic causative, control and purpose", PhD, pp.1995
  18. Kwon, Nayoung, "Object control in Korean: Structure and processing", Japanese, 2006, pp.15, 249~262
  19. Kwon, Nayoung, "Movement theory of control", pp.299~328 (2010), John Benjamins
  20. Landau, Idan, "Control in generative grammar : A research companion" (2013), Cambridge University Press
  21. 이우승, "Control Constructions Redux: Focusing on the -tolok Clause", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.469~490 (2013), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  22. Mathôt, Sebastiaan, "OpenSesame : An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences", Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), pp.314~324 (2012)
  23. McEnery, Tony, "Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice" (2011), Cambridge University Press
  24. Monahan, Philip J., "Backward object control in Korean", Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast conference on formal linguistics, pp.356~369 (2003), Cascadilla Press
  25. 박동우, "An English VPE puzzle and a derivational approach to ellipsis", 언어연구, 35(1), pp.1~27 (2018), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  26. 박홍근, "Control Constructions in Korean Revisited", 생성문법연구, 22(1), pp.1~22 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  27. Park, Jong Un, "Clause structure and null subjects: Referential dependencies in Korean", PhD, pp.2011
  28. Polinsky, Maria, "Object control in Korean: Obligatory vs. non-obligatory control", ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 47, pp.197~217 (2007)
  29. R Core Team, "R: A language and environment for statistical computing", R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ~ (2019)
  30. Mamoru Saito, "Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.203~227 (2007), 언어교육원
  31. 신정아, "혼합효과모형(Mixed-Effects Model)을 이용한 실험언어학 데이터 분석 방법 고찰: 자기조절읽기 실험 데이터를 중심으로", 영어학, 19(1), pp.76~94 (2019), 한국영어학회[DOI]
  32. 송상헌, "What do you mean by contrast in syntax?", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.387~426 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  33. 송상헌, "In Defense of Comparisons between Formal and Informal Acceptability Judgments", 생성문법연구, 27(4), pp.893~902 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  34. Takahashi, Daiko, "The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics", pp.394~422 (2008), Oxford University Press
  35. "Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications" (2013)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)