Non-control aspects of the Korean yaksokha-construction
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study presents evidence to support the claim that the Korean yaksokha-construction (which corresponds to the English promise-construction) does not meet the criteria for a subject control construction. Although it may appear similar to the English promise-construction when the embedded subject is omitted, a closer examination reveals significant differences between the two constructions. Moreover, this paper argues that the Anti-redundancy Hypothesis, which discourages the use of two noun phrases with nearly identical forms to refer to the same entity in close proximity, accounts for awkwardness of the yaksokha-construction when the matrix subject and the embedded subject are present at the same time. Finally, the non-control analysis is extended to include other yaksokha-constructions that contain a keyss-ta-ko-clause or kes-clause.
Abstract
This study presents evidence to support the claim that the Korean yaksokha-construction (which corresponds to the English promise-construction) does not meet the criteria for a subject control construction. Although it may appear similar to the English promise-construction when the embedded subject is omitted, a closer examination reveals significant differences between the two constructions. Moreover, this paper argues that the Anti-redundancy Hypothesis, which discourages the use of two noun phrases with nearly identical forms to refer to the same entity in close proximity, accounts for awkwardness of the yaksokha-construction when the matrix subject and the embedded subject are present at the same time. Finally, the non-control analysis is extended to include other yaksokha-constructions that contain a keyss-ta-ko-clause or kes-clause.
참고문헌 (35)
- Barrie Michael Jonathan Mathew, "Numeral classifiers in Korean -ki nominalizations", 언어연구, 39(3), pp.499~518 (2022), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Boeckx, Cedric, "Reply to ‘Control is not movement’", Linguistic Inquiry, 34(2), pp.269~280 (2003)
- Boeckx, Cedric, "Movement under control", Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3), pp.431~452 (2004)
- Boeckx, Cedric, "Control as Movement" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Bresnan, Joan, "Control and complementation", Linguistic Inquiry, 13(3), pp.343~434 (1982)
- Choe, Hyon Sook, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics XI", pp.373~386 (2006), Hanshin
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), The MIT Press
- Cormack, Annabel, "Backward control in Korean and Japanese", University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, pp.57~83 (2004)
- Farkas, Donca F, "On obligatory control", Linguistics and Philosophy, 11(1), pp.27~58 (1988)
- Gamerschlag, Thomas, "Semantic and structural aspects of complement control in Korean", ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 47, pp.81~123 (2007)
- Hoe, Semoon, "A study on obligatory control constructions in Korean based on exhaustive and partial controls", PhD, pp.2014
- 홍은미, "한국어 통제 동사의 논항 실현과 어순 선호: 코퍼스 연구", 언어, 45(2), pp.421~449 (2020), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30(1), pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Move! A minimalist theory of construal" (2001), Blackwell Publishers
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Minimalist syntax", pp.6~81 (2003), Blackwell
- Jackendoff, Ray, "The semantic basis of control in English", Language, 79(3), pp.517~556 (2003)
- Jaeger, T. Florian, "Redundancy and reduction : Speakers manage syntactic information density", Cognitive Psychology, 61, pp.23~62 (2010)
- Kwon, Nayoung, "Object control in Korean: Structure and processing", Japanese, 2006, pp.15, 249~262
- Kwon, Nayoung, "Movement theory of control", pp.299~328 (2010), John Benjamins
- 권영중, "A-Movement Analysis of the Finite Obligatory Control Constructions in Korean", 언어학 연구, (30), pp.19~43 (2014), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- Landau, Idan, "Control in generative grammar: A research companion" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- 이혜란, "A Movement Analysis of Control Construction in Korean", 생성문법연구, 21(4), pp.639~669 (2011), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Lee, Juwon, "The persuade-construction in Korean controls nothing", Proceedings of the 33rd Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC), pp.95~103 (2019)
- 이주원, "Revisiting the persuade-constructions in Korean with empirical evidence", 언어연구, 37(1), pp.29~70 (2020), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Lee, Kum Young, "Finite control in Korean", PhD, pp.2009
- Madigan, S. William, "Control constructions in Korean", PhD, pp.2008
- Meister, Clara, "Revisiting the uniform information density hypothesis", arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.11635, ~ (2021)
- 박홍근, "Control Constructions in Korean Revisited", 생성문법연구, 22(1), pp.1~22 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Park, Jong Un, "Clause structure and null subjects: Referential dependencies in Korean", PhD, pp.2011
- 박종언, "Remarks on the Unified Approach to Obligatory Control and Apparently Similar Constructions", 생성문법연구, 22(2), pp.497~528 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Williams, Edwin, "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11(1), pp.203~238 (1980)
- Yang, Dong-Whee, "Control and binding in Korean", Linguistic Journal of Korea, 7(2), pp.257~283 (1982)
- Yang. Dong-Whee, "The extended control theory", Language Research, 20(1), pp.19~30 (1984)
- Zipf, G. Kingsley, "Human behavior and the principle of least effort" (1949), Addison-Wesley Press