담임교사의 권력기반이 중고등 학생들의 학교규범 준수행동, 학교만족 및 성적에 미치는 영향
The Impact of a Class Teacher's Power Bases on Students
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구에서는 중고등 학생들이 지각한 학급 담임교사의 권력기반에 따른 학교규범 준수행동, 학교만족도 및 성적 차이를 살펴보고자 하였다. 남녀 중등학생 총 260명을 대상으로 실시한 본 연구의 주요결과는 첫째, 담임교사의 참조권력이 클수록 학생들은 학교의 규정적 규범(하도록 권장하는 행동들)을 잘 준수하고 있었으며, 그 이외의 다른 권력들은 규정적 규범준수 정도와 무관하였다. 둘째, 학생들의 금지적 규범(하지 말도록 권장하는 행동들)준수는 담임교사의 개별 권력기반보다는 강제권력과 전문성권력, 전문성권력과 참조권력, 합법권력과 참조권력의 결합에 따라 다른 영향을 주고 있었다. 셋째, 담임교사의 강제권력이 크다고 지각할수록 학생들의 학교만족도가 낮은 반면, 합법권력과 참조권력이 클수록 학교만족도는 높은 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 지각된 담임교사 권력기반과 성적간에는 유의한 관계가 없었다.
Abstract
The present study aims to investigate students' perception of his(her) class teachers' power bases. Specifically, the current study centers around the effects of the class teacher's power bases on students' norm observance, levels of school satisfaction, and academic performance. 260 students from secondary schools participated in the current research. The major findings are as follows. First, the greater the teacher's referent power, the more the students conformed to descriptive norms. However, power bases other than referent power had no bearing on the extent to which these students followed descriptive norms. Second, students' prescriptive norm observance was found to be affected by a combination of power bases between coercive power and expert power, between expert power and referent power, and between legitimate power and referent power rather than the teachers' individual power base. Third, the students' levels of school satisfaction were revealed to be low when they perceived their teachers' coercive power as great. On the contrary, their level of school satisfaction was found to be higher when they viewed legitimate power and referent power as being greater. Finally, no significant relation was noticed in academic performance with regard to the students' perceptions of their class teachers' power bases.
참고문헌 (40)
- 권동택, "초등학교조직에서 학교장의 리더십과 교사의 팔로워십간 관계에 미치는 LMX의 매개효과", 초등교육연구, 20(2), pp.53~74 (2007)
- 권순명, "학교상담의 과제와 개선 방향", 교육발전논총, 21(1), pp.173~192 (2000)
- 김회용, "좋은 교사의 자질", 교육철학, 38, pp.27~46 (2007)
- 박성희, "초기상담에서 내담자가 지각한 상담자의? 권력기반에 따른 상담효과의 차이", 한국심리학회지:상담력 (2008)
- 이상길, "담임교사와의 대화공감도를 비롯한 학교 변인과 고교생의 진로정체감", 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 18(3), pp.613~627 (2006)
- 임성택, "청소년의 규범적 문제행동과 관련된 변인의 탐색", 청소년연구, 9(1), pp.221~246 (2002)
- 임영숙, "교사가 지각하는 중등학교장의 권력기반 크기에 따른 교사의 직무만족도", 경남대 교육대학원 논문집, 11, pp.31~56 (2005)
- 조영남, "초등교사의 교사효과성 평가 준거 개발에 관한 연구", 초등교육연구, 14(3), pp.243~267 (2001)
- 최동선, "고등학생의 직업적 성격과 학업성취도,학교에의 적응,직업가치관과의 관계 분석", 석사, pp.1997
- Aiken, L.S., "Multiple regression; Testing and interpreting interactions" (1991), Sage
- Aguinis, H., "Power bases of faculty supervisors and educational outcomes for graduate students", Journal of Higher Education, 67, pp.267~297 (1996)
- Bachman, J. G., "Bases of supervisory power: A comparative study in five organizational study in five organizational settings. In Control in organization", pp.213~227 (1968), ?McGraw-Hill
- Burnette, N.P., "A descriptive study of the power bases used at North Carolina principals" (1992), The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Cartwright, D., "Influence leadership and control. In Handbook of organization" (1965), Rand McNally and Company
- correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.), "Applied multiple regression", pp.1983, Cohen, J.
- Dvir, T., "Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment", Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp.735~744 (2002)
- Forsyth, D.R., "Group dynamics" (2006), Thomson
- French, J. R. P., "The bases of social power. In Studies in social power", pp.150~167 (1959), Institute for Social Research
- Gage, N. L., "Theories of teaching. In Teaching and learning process" (1972), Prentice Hall
- Gerstner, L. V., "Reinventing education. in 학교가 달라져야 한다" (2001), 미래경영개발연구원
- Gorton, R. A., "School leadership and administration(4th ed.)" (1993), Brown & Benchmark
- Hornstein, H. A., "Influence and satisfaction in organization: A replication", Sociology of Education, 41, pp.380~389 (1968)
- Ivancevich, J. M., "An analysis of control, bases of control and satisfaction in an organizational setting", Academy of Management Journal, 13, pp.427~436 (1970)
- Kaplowitz, S.A., "Towards a systematic theory of power attribution", Social Psychology, 41, pp.131~148 (1978)
- Lawler, E. J., "Coercive capability in conflict: A test of bilateral deterrence versus conflict spiral theory", Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, pp.93~107 (1988)
- Lawler, E., "Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion", American Sociological Review, 61, pp.89~108 (1996)
- Littlepage, G. E., "Recognition and utilization of expertise in problem-solving groups: Expert characteristic and behavior", Group Dynamic: Theory Research and Practice, 1, pp.324~328 (1997)
- Lymas, L.W., "A study of the use of power by middle school and high school principals and its relationship to teacher satisfaction with work and with principal" (1992), University of Maryland Press
- Miskel, C. G., "Organizational structures and processes, perceived school effectiveness, loyalty and job satisfaction", Educational Administration Quarterly, 15, pp.97~118 (1979)
- Podsakoff, P. M., "Field studies of French and Raven’s bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research", Psychological Bulletin, 97, pp.387~411 (1985)
- Robyak, J. E., "Effects of gender, supervision, and presenting problems on practicum students' preference for interpersonal power bases", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, pp.159~163 (1986)
- Russell, B., "Power" (1938), George Allen & Unwyn
- Simon, H.A., "Administrative behavior" (1957), Macmillan
- Sorrels, J. P., "Conformity by ommission", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, pp.302~305 (1984)
- Students, K.R., "Supervisory influence and workgroup performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, pp.188~194 (1968)
- Tyler, T. R., "Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement" (2000), Braun-Brurnfield
- Tyler, T. R., "Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, pp.913~930 (1996)
- Warren, D.I., "Power, visibility, and comforter in formal organization", American Sociological Review, 18, pp.741~752 (1968)
- Yukl, G. A., "Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs" (1994), Prentice Hall
- Yukl, G. A., "Influence tactics used for different objectives with subordinates, peers, and superiors", Group and Organization Management, 20, pp.272~296 (1995)
