간담화, 한일도서협정과 일본정부의 식민지 지배 인식의 연속성
A Study on the Continuity of the Japanese Government's Perception of Colonial Rule : Focus on Kan Statement and Korea-Japan Agreement for Books
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article attempts to clarify the continuity of the Japanese government's perception of colonial rule through analyzing historical perception of the ‘Kan statement’ and ‘Korea-Japan Agreement for Books’. In order to analysis the perception this article examines ‘Kan statement’ and ‘Korea-Japan Agreement for Books’ through ‘Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea’ and ‘Agreement on the Art Objects and Cultural Co-operation between Japan and the Republic of Korea’ in the Korea-Japan Normalization talks. Tokyo had held the perception that the ‘Japan–Korea treaty of 1910’ has been legally valid and following colonial ruling was legally legitimate. Therefore, Tokyo has similar perception on the issue on transfer of Korean cultural heritage to Japan during the colonial period, which was conducted by a legitimate authority of colonial ruling bodies based on the annexation treaty of 1910. This article argues that similar historical perception can be found in the ‘Kan statement’ through examinations. ‘Kan statement’ and ‘Korea-Japan Agreement for Books’ had the same historical perception as ‘Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea’ and ‘Agreement on the Art Objects and Cultural Co-operation between Japan and the Republic of Korea’. It is claimed that although Kan, the first prime minister to express apology to the colonial rule in Korea through official statement, was signed the Agreement for books, the first large-scale cultural properties delivery after the Korea-Japan talks, the historical perception that ‘Japan–Korea treaty of 1910’ and the export of cultural properties were legally valid has been still embedded in his statement and actions. This article clarifies the continuity of the Japanese government's perception of colonial rule through this analysis.
Abstract
This article attempts to clarify the continuity of the Japanese government's perception of colonial rule through analyzing historical perception of the ‘Kan statement’ and ‘Korea-Japan Agreement for Books’. In order to analysis the perception this article examines ‘Kan statement’ and ‘Korea-Japan Agreement for Books’ through ‘Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea’ and ‘Agreement on the Art Objects and Cultural Co-operation between Japan and the Republic of Korea’ in the Korea-Japan Normalization talks. Tokyo had held the perception that the ‘Japan–Korea treaty of 1910’ has been legally valid and following colonial ruling was legally legitimate. Therefore, Tokyo has similar perception on the issue on transfer of Korean cultural heritage to Japan during the colonial period, which was conducted by a legitimate authority of colonial ruling bodies based on the annexation treaty of 1910. This article argues that similar historical perception can be found in the ‘Kan statement’ through examinations. ‘Kan statement’ and ‘Korea-Japan Agreement for Books’ had the same historical perception as ‘Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea’ and ‘Agreement on the Art Objects and Cultural Co-operation between Japan and the Republic of Korea’. It is claimed that although Kan, the first prime minister to express apology to the colonial rule in Korea through official statement, was signed the Agreement for books, the first large-scale cultural properties delivery after the Korea-Japan talks, the historical perception that ‘Japan–Korea treaty of 1910’ and the export of cultural properties were legally valid has been still embedded in his statement and actions. This article clarifies the continuity of the Japanese government's perception of colonial rule through this analysis.
참고문헌 (44)
- 국성하, "한일회담 문화재 반환협상 연구", 한국독립운동사연구, (25), pp.369~393 (2005), 한국독립운동사연구소
- 남기정, "한일관계에서 역사 문제와 안보의 연동 메커니즘: 투트랙 접근의 조건과 과제", 일본연구논총, (45), pp.123~152 (2017), 현대일본학회[DOI]
- 박훈, "외교문서 공개와 한일회담의 재조명 2-의제로 본 한일회담" (2010), 선인
- 엄태봉, "한일회담 중단기의 문화재 문제에 관한 연구", 일본공간, (21), pp.160~193 (2017), 일본학연구소[DOI]
- 엄태봉, "제6차 한일회담 시기의 문화재 반환 교섭 연구- 교섭 과정과 그 의미를 중심으로", 동북아역사논총, (60), pp.116~159 (2018), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
- 엄태봉, "한일회담 문화재 반환 협상의 재조명", 아태연구, 26(2), pp.199~228 (2019), 국제지역연구원[DOI]
- 외교부, "제6차 한일회담. 제2차 정치회담 예비절충: 본회의, 1-65차. 1962.8.21.-64.2.6 전5권(V.3 22-32차 1963.1.11.-3.28)", ~ (1964)
- 제7차 한·일회담(1964.12.3.-65.6.22) 문화재위원회 회의 개최 계획, 1965, "외교부", ~ (1965)
- 외교부, "2015 일본개황" (2015), 외교부
- 이기태, "일본 민주당 정권의 대한국정책", 일본연구논총, (38), pp.133~163 (2013), 현대일본학회[DOI]
- 이원덕, "한일관계 ‘65년 체제’의 기본성격 및 문제점: 북·일수교에의 함의", 국제·지역연구, 9(4) (2000)
- 장박진, "한일회담에서의 기본관계 조약 형성과정의 분석: 제 2조 '구조약 무효조항' 및 제 3조 '유일합법성 조항'을 중심으로", 국제.지역연구, 17(2), pp.1~39 (2008), 국제학연구소
- 정재정, "한일협력과 역사문제 - 갈등을 넘어 화해로", 일본연구논총, (43), pp.65~93 (2016), 현대일본학회[DOI]
- 조윤수, "한일회담과 문화재 반환 교섭–일본 정부의 반환 문화재 목록 작성과정을 중심으로–", 동북아역사논총, (51), pp.125~165 (2016), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
- 최희식, "전후 한일관계의 구도와 민주당 정부하의 한일관계", 국제.지역연구, 20(3), pp.43~75 (2011), 국제학연구소
- 한소미, "문화재 반환협상의 국제정치 : 2011년 일본과 프랑스의 한국 문화재 반환 결정요인을 중심으로", 석사, 정치학과, pp.2014
- 혜문, "의궤 되찾은 조선의 보물" (2011), 동국대학교출판부
- 韓国との文化財・文化協定の条文化についての交渉 No.461, "アジア局北東アジア課内交渉史編纂委員会", ~ (1969)
- 李鐘元他, "戦後日韓関係史" (2017), 有斐閣アルマ
- 日韓予備交渉第21回会合記録 No.651, "外務省", ~ (1962)
- 外務省, "日韓会談第五回基本関係委員会議事録", 記入なし, No.977, ~
- 外務省, "第7次日韓全面会談基本関係委員会第3回会合 No. 1345", ~ (1964)
- "도서에 관한 일본국 정부와 대한민국 정부 간의 협정" (2010)[URL]
- 参議院, "第50回国会日韓条約等特別委員会第2号", ~ (1965)
- 参議院, "第50回国会日韓条約等特別委員会第6号", ~ (1965)
- 参議院, "第134回国会本会議第4号", ~ (1995)
- 参議院, "第177回国会參議院外交防衛委員会第11号", ~ (2011)
- "菅内閣総理大臣記者会見" (2010)[URL]
- 衆議院, "第50回国会日本国と大韓民国との間の条約及び協定等に関する特別委員会第2号", ~ (1965)
- 衆議院, "第50回国会日本国と大韓民国との間の条約及び協定等に関する特別委員会第6号", ~ (1965)
- 衆議院, "第50回国会日本国と大韓民国との間の条約及び協定等に関する特別委員会第8号", ~ (1965)
- 衆議院, "第50回国会日本国と大韓民国との間の条約及び協定等に関する特別委員会第10号", ~ (1965)
- 衆議院, "第177回国会衆議院外務委員会第8号", ~ (2011)
- 中内康夫, "日韓図書協定の作成経緯と主な内容-朝鮮王朝儀軌等の韓国政府への引渡し-", 立法と調査, 314 (2011)
- 藤原夏人, "【韓国】日韓併合100年をめぐる動き", 外国の立法, 245(1) (2010)
- "<日총리담화> 학계 ‘핵심비켜간 담화’" (2010)[URL]
- "日 관방, 강제징용자 보상필요 시사" (2010)[URL]
- "<日총리담화> 보수우익 반발에 ‘축소.굴절’" (2010)[URL]
- "표준어대사전"[URL]
- "후쿠다 日 총리 ‘李 당선인 對日정책 기조 소중히 여길 것’" (2008)[URL]
- "일본, 조선왕실의궤 등 1,205책 반환키로" (2010)[URL]
- "‘日반출 문화재 반환’ 합의 의미와 전망은" (2011)[URL]
- "강점기 약탈 문화재 日, 한국에 반환 추진" (2010)[URL]
- "한일, 조선왕실의궤 등 1,205책 도서 반환 서명" (2010)[URL]