대한 정형외과 전공의 평가시험에서 족부-족관절 분야 문항 분석
An Analysis of the Foot and Ankle-related Questions on the Korean Orthopedic In-Training Examination
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the questions pertaining to the foot and ankle on the Korean Orthopedic In-Training Examination (KOITE) between 2012 and 2016. Materials and Methods: Questions regarding the foot and ankle on KOITE during the five-year period (2012∼2016) were analyzed. Number of foot and ankle questions, topics, taxonomic classification, imaging modalities, and cited references related to each question were analyzed. Results: The average number of foot and ankle questions was 35, accounting for 7.0% (35/500) of all KOITE questions. All questions were categorized into three topic areas: disease (51.4%, 18/35), trauma (31.4%, 11/35), and basics (17.1%, 6/35). Taxonomy 3 (decisionmaking type questions) was the most common (42.9%, 15/35). References that are commonly used for each question were Campbell’s Operative Orthopedics (100%, 35/35) and the textbook of The Korean Orthopaedic Association (74.3%, 26/35). Conclusion: This analysis can be valuable to not only orthopaedic surgery residents to improve their knowledge of orthopedics, but also to instructors for optimizing their education programs.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the questions pertaining to the foot and ankle on the Korean Orthopedic In-Training Examination (KOITE) between 2012 and 2016. Materials and Methods: Questions regarding the foot and ankle on KOITE during the five-year period (2012∼2016) were analyzed. Number of foot and ankle questions, topics, taxonomic classification, imaging modalities, and cited references related to each question were analyzed. Results: The average number of foot and ankle questions was 35, accounting for 7.0% (35/500) of all KOITE questions. All questions were categorized into three topic areas: disease (51.4%, 18/35), trauma (31.4%, 11/35), and basics (17.1%, 6/35). Taxonomy 3 (decisionmaking type questions) was the most common (42.9%, 15/35). References that are commonly used for each question were Campbell’s Operative Orthopedics (100%, 35/35) and the textbook of The Korean Orthopaedic Association (74.3%, 26/35). Conclusion: This analysis can be valuable to not only orthopaedic surgery residents to improve their knowledge of orthopedics, but also to instructors for optimizing their education programs.
참고문헌 (8)
- Suk SI, "The first In-Training Examination for Residents in Orthopaedic Surgery", J Korean Orthop Assoc, 15, pp.874~878 (1980)
- Srinivasan RC, "Analysis of the foot and ankle section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination(OITE)", Foot Ankle Int, 30, pp.1060~1064 (2009)
- Osbahr DC, "Orthopaedic In-Training Examination : an analysis of the sports medicine section", Am J Sports Med, 39, pp.532~537 (2011)
- 김동희, "대한민국 정형외과 전공의 평가시험 분석: 수부 및완관절 분야", Archives of Hand and Microsurgery, 21(1), pp.1~7 (2016), 대한수부외과학회
- Buckwalter JA, "Use of an educational taxonomy for evaluation of cognitive performance", J Med Educ, 56, pp.115~121 (1981)
- Walsh CT, "Levels of evidence for foot and ankle questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination : 15-year trends", J Surg Educ, 73, pp.999~1003 (2016)
- Barr CR, "Foot and ankle questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: analysis of content, reference, and performance", Orthopedics, 35, pp.e880~e888 (2012)
- 조요한, "Analysis of the Korean Orthopedic In-Training Examination: The Hip and Pelvis Section", Hip and Pelvis, 28(3), pp.157~163 (2016), 대한고관절학회[DOI]