본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

족관절 관절염 치료 동향: 대한족부족관절학회 회원 설문조사 분석

Current Trends in the Treatment of Ankle Arthritis: Analysis of the Korean Foot and Ankle Society (KFAS) Member Survey

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: Variations in the preferred conservative and operative treatment methods for ankle arthritis may be observed in the practice of orthopedic surgeons. This study is based on the Korean Foot and Ankle Society (KFAS) member survey and aims to report the current trend and changes in the management of ankle arthritis over the last few decades. Materials and Methods: A web-based questionnaire containing 24 questions was sent to all KFAS members in July 2021. The questions were mainly related to the preferred techniques and clinical experience in osteotomy, arthrodesis, and total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) for patients with ankle arthritis. Results: Sixty-three out of 550 surgeons (11.5%) responded to the survey. The responses to 6 out of the total of 24 questions (25.0%) achieved the levels needed to reflect a tendency. Answers that showed a tendency were related to the following: a surgical approach for arthrodesis (anterior approach), use of auto-bone graft for arthrodesis (iliac bone), a nonunion rate of more than 10% following arthrod- esis, main reason related to unsatisfactory results after arthrodesis (nonunion or delayed union), the main reason to change total ankle prosthesis (unstable supply of prosthesis), the unusualness of revision TAA and conversion of fusion to TAA. Diversity was found in sev- eral aspects of treatment (degree of experience and satisfaction in supramalleolar osteotomy, fixation method for arthrodesis, preferred TAA prosthesis and longevity, degree of experinece, annual number of TAA operation. Conclusion: This study proposes updated information with regard to the current trends in the management of ankle arthritis in Korea. Both consensus and variations in the approach to patients with ankle arthritis were identified through this survey. With an increasing preference for TAA, the need for the development of a prosthesis optimized for Koreans and a stable supply of prostheses were the sug- gestions made by the study.

Abstract

Purpose: Variations in the preferred conservative and operative treatment methods for ankle arthritis may be observed in the practice of orthopedic surgeons. This study is based on the Korean Foot and Ankle Society (KFAS) member survey and aims to report the current trend and changes in the management of ankle arthritis over the last few decades. Materials and Methods: A web-based questionnaire containing 24 questions was sent to all KFAS members in July 2021. The questions were mainly related to the preferred techniques and clinical experience in osteotomy, arthrodesis, and total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) for patients with ankle arthritis. Results: Sixty-three out of 550 surgeons (11.5%) responded to the survey. The responses to 6 out of the total of 24 questions (25.0%) achieved the levels needed to reflect a tendency. Answers that showed a tendency were related to the following: a surgical approach for arthrodesis (anterior approach), use of auto-bone graft for arthrodesis (iliac bone), a nonunion rate of more than 10% following arthrod- esis, main reason related to unsatisfactory results after arthrodesis (nonunion or delayed union), the main reason to change total ankle prosthesis (unstable supply of prosthesis), the unusualness of revision TAA and conversion of fusion to TAA. Diversity was found in sev- eral aspects of treatment (degree of experience and satisfaction in supramalleolar osteotomy, fixation method for arthrodesis, preferred TAA prosthesis and longevity, degree of experinece, annual number of TAA operation. Conclusion: This study proposes updated information with regard to the current trends in the management of ankle arthritis in Korea. Both consensus and variations in the approach to patients with ankle arthritis were identified through this survey. With an increasing preference for TAA, the need for the development of a prosthesis optimized for Koreans and a stable supply of prostheses were the sug- gestions made by the study.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Nikolaos Gougoulias, "How Successful are Current Ankle Replacements?: A Systematic Review of the Literature", Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 468(1), pp.199~208 (2010), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  2. Aaron J. Guyer, "Current Concepts Review: Total Ankle Arthroplasty", Foot & Ankle International, 29(2), pp.256~264 (2008), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  3. James A. Nunley, "Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement", Foot & Ankle International, 40(11), pp.1239~1248 (2019), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  4. R. Zaidi, "The outcome of total ankle replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis", The Bone & Joint Journal, 95-B(11), pp.1500~1507 (2013), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
  5. Beat Hintermann, "Total ankle replacement", Foot and Ankle Clinics, 8(2), pp.375~405 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  6. Jamal Ahmad, "Ankle Arthrodesis: The Simple and the Complex", Foot and Ankle Clinics, 13(3), pp.381~400 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. Joel Morash, "Ankle Arthrodesis Versus Total Ankle Arthroplasty", Foot and Ankle Clinics, 22(2), pp.251~266 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  8. D. I. Pedowitz, "Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis: a comparative analysis of arc of movement and functional outcomes", The Bone & Joint Journal, 98-B(5), pp.634~640 (2016), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
  9. Syndie Singer, "Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls", The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 95(24), pp.e191~ (2013), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  10. Elizabeth A. Cody, "Total ankle arthroplasty: a critical analysis review", JBJS Reviews, 6(8), pp.e8~e8 (2018), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  11. Alexandra I. Stavrakis, "Trends in Complication Rates Following Ankle Arthrodesis and Total Ankle Replacement", Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 98(17), pp.1453~1458 (2016), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)