족부족관절 분야의 환자 자가 보고 결과 평가법
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of the Foot and Ankle
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in assessing the patient’s overall health, lesion-specific outcomes, and condition-specific outcomes. PROMs are also known as “scoring systems” and are usually in questionnaires. There are almost a hundred different PROMs available in foot and ankle surgery. Each PROM has its merits, demerits, and validity. Selecting an appropriate PROM is important for adequately evaluating a patient’s health status. This article summarizes the most frequently used PROMs in the literature on foot and ankle surgery and presents the authors’ recommendations.
Abstract
The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in assessing the patient’s overall health, lesion-specific outcomes, and condition-specific outcomes. PROMs are also known as “scoring systems” and are usually in questionnaires. There are almost a hundred different PROMs available in foot and ankle surgery. Each PROM has its merits, demerits, and validity. Selecting an appropriate PROM is important for adequately evaluating a patient’s health status. This article summarizes the most frequently used PROMs in the literature on foot and ankle surgery and presents the authors’ recommendations.
참고문헌 (50)
- Naal FD, "Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, pp.815~826 (2010)[DOI]
- Hunt KJ, "Patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery", Orthop Clin North Am, 49, pp.277~289 (2018)[DOI]
- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, "Instruments for collection of orthopaedic quality data" (2016), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Scott J, "Graphic representation of pain", Pain, 2, pp.175~184 (1976)[DOI]
- Ware JE Jr, "The MOS 36-item short-form health survey(SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection", Med Care, 30, pp.473~483 (1992)[DOI]
- Kitaoka HB, "Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, mid-foot, hallux, and lesser toes", Foot Ankle Int, 15, pp.349~353 (1994)[DOI]
- Budiman-Mak E, "The Foot Function Index : a measure of foot pain and disability", J Clin Epidemiol, 44, pp.561~570 (1991)[DOI]
- EuroQol Group, "EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life", Health Policy, 16, pp.199~208 (1990)[DOI]
- Lakey E, "Patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle orthopedics", Foot Ankle Orthop, 4, pp.2473011419852930~ (2019)[DOI]
- Nilsson-Helander K, "The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score(ATRS) : development and validation", Am J Sports Med, 35, pp.421~426 (2007)[DOI]
- Domsic RT, "Ankle osteoarthritis scale", Foot Ankle Int, 19, pp.466~471 (1998)[DOI]
- Kearney RS, "A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess Achilles tendon rupture management : what’s being used and should we be using it?", Br J Sports Med, 46, pp.1102~1109 (2012)[DOI]
- Jia Y, "A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases", Qual Life Res, 26, pp.1969~2010 (2017)[DOI]
- Mokkink LB, "The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes", J Clin Epidemiol, 63, pp.737~745 (2010)[DOI]
- Terwee CB, "Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires", J Clin Epidemiol, 60, pp.34~42 (2007)[DOI]
- van Tulder M, "Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 28, pp.1290~1299 (2003)[DOI]
- Prinsen CAC, "COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patientreported outcome measures", Qual Life Res, 27, pp.1147~1157 (2018)[DOI]
- Hunt KJ, "Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, pp.e118~ (2013)
- Pinsker E, "AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems", Foot Ankle Int, 32, pp.841~842 (2011)[DOI]
- Malviya A, "Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health QUALY score in foot and ankle surgery", Foot Ankle Int, 28, pp.494~498 (2007)[DOI]
- Ferreira-Valente MA, "Validity of four pain intensity rating scales", Pain, 152, pp.2399~2404 (2011)[DOI]
- Kersten P, "Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using Rasch analysis", PLoS One, 9, pp.e99485~ (2014)[DOI]
- Busija L, "Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery", Health Qual Life Outcomes, 6, pp.55~ (2008)[DOI]
- Laucis NC, "Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics : a brief guide", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 97, pp.1628~1634 (2015)[DOI]
- Jenkinson C, "A shorter form health survey : can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?", J Public Health Med, 19, pp.179~186 (1997)[DOI]
- Gosling CM, "Validity of outcome measures used to assess one and six month outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients", Injury, 42, pp.1443~1448 (2011)[DOI]
- Hijji FY, "The popularity of outcome measures used in the foot and ankle literature", Foot Ankle Spec, 13, pp.58~68 (2020)[DOI]
- Brooks R, "EuroQol : the current state of play", Health Policy, 37, pp.53~72 (1996)[DOI]
- Mani SB, "Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity", Foot Ankle Int, 34, pp.1140~1146 (2013)[DOI]
- Golightly YM, "Psychometric properties of the foot and ankle outcome score in a community-based study of adults with and without osteoarthritis", Arthritis Care Res(Hoboken), 66, pp.395~403 (2014)[DOI]
- Lee KM, "Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score(FAOS)", Clin Rheumatol, 32, pp.1443~1450 (2013)[DOI]
- Shazadeh Safavi P, "A systematic review of the outcome evaluation tools for the foot and ankle", Foot Ankle Spec, 12, pp.461~470 (2019)[DOI]
- In TS, "The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints", J Phys Ther Sci, 29, pp.53~56 (2017)[DOI]
- Huh JW, "Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Foot Function Index", J Foot Ankle Surg, 55, pp.759~761 (2016)[DOI]
- Budiman-Mak E, "Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index", Foot Ankle Int, 27, pp.519~527 (2006)[DOI]
- Budiman-Mak E, "A review of the foot function index and the foot function index-revised", J Foot Ankle Res, 6, pp.5~ (2013)[DOI]
- Hale SA, "Reliability and sensitivity of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index in subjects with chronic ankle instability", J Athl Train, 40, pp.35~40 (2005)
- Martin RL, "Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure(FAAM)", Foot Ankle Int, 26, pp.968~983 (2005)[DOI]
- Dawson J, "A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery : validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus", Qual Life Res, 15, pp.1211~1222 (2006)[DOI]
- Dawson J, "Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire(MOXFQ)compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus", Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 15, pp.918~931 (2007)[DOI]
- Venkatesan M, "Evaluation of validity, reliability, and feasibility of 3 patient-reported foot and ankle outcome measures", J Foot Ankle Surg, 59, pp.507~512 (2020)[DOI]
- Pinsker E, "Reliability and validity of 6 measures of pain, function, and disability for ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis", Foot Ankle Int, 36, pp.617~625 (2015)[DOI]
- Madeley NJ, "Responsiveness and validity of the SF-36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in end stage ankle arthritis", Foot Ankle Int, 33, pp.57~63 (2012)[DOI]
- Wing KJ, "Measuring the operative treatment effect in end-stage ankle arthritis:are we asking the right questions? A COFAS multicenter study", Foot Ankle Int, 38, pp.1064~1069 (2017)[DOI]
- Croft S, "Association of Ankle Arthritis Score with need for revision surgery", Foot Ankle Int, 38, pp.939~943 (2017)[DOI]
- Park YH, "Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean translation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 22, pp.876~ (2021)[DOI]
- McKeown R, "Primary outcome measures used in interventional trials for ankle fractures : a systematic review", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 20, pp.388~ (2019)[DOI]
- "Patient reported outcome measures. Quality Measures"[URL]
- 김유미, "족부 족관절 질환 환자에서 전자식 족부 기능 지수의 인증: 임의 배정, 전향적, 다기관 연구", 대한족부족관절학회지, 23(1), pp.24~30 (2019), 대한족부족관절학회[DOI]
- Park JY, "Comparison between an electronic version of the foot and ankle outcome score and the standard paper version : a randomized multicenter study", Medicine(Baltimore), 98, pp.e17440~ (2019)[DOI]
