출산억제정책으로서 모자보건법과낙태에 대한 반성적 접근
The Reconsideration on the Mother and Child Health Law and the Abortion for the Control Policy on Delivery
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is the strong forbidden clause of criminal law about abortion. But in reality, a lot of illegal abortion are performed despite of the permissible clause in The Mother and Child Health Law. The law lead to be inconsistent with its enforcement. In this paper, I would like to suggest some proposals about the analysis of the Abortion Regulation to reform the existing regulation and increase the effectiveness of the regulations. The Mother and Child Health Law prescribes the medical, ethical, and genetic grounds for the legal permission of abortion. But the right of life is an essential part of human dignity, and the life of fetus is virtually all in the fetus' dignity. Therefore the abortion must to be permissible in more strict condition. And the permissible period of abortion must be shortened from gestation 24 weeks to gestation 12 weeks. It is necessary to be revised of the penalty provision against illegal abortion for the purpose of protecting life and preventing the illegal abortion. In conclusion, I basically oppose to abortion for human dignity, except special cases. Therefore the abortion may be morally permissible for the case of a woman'life is threatened by pregnancy and unavoidable abortion after rape, because nobody is morally required to sacrifice her life to keep another person life.
Abstract
There is the strong forbidden clause of criminal law about abortion. But in reality, a lot of illegal abortion are performed despite of the permissible clause in The Mother and Child Health Law. The law lead to be inconsistent with its enforcement. In this paper, I would like to suggest some proposals about the analysis of the Abortion Regulation to reform the existing regulation and increase the effectiveness of the regulations. The Mother and Child Health Law prescribes the medical, ethical, and genetic grounds for the legal permission of abortion. But the right of life is an essential part of human dignity, and the life of fetus is virtually all in the fetus' dignity. Therefore the abortion must to be permissible in more strict condition. And the permissible period of abortion must be shortened from gestation 24 weeks to gestation 12 weeks. It is necessary to be revised of the penalty provision against illegal abortion for the purpose of protecting life and preventing the illegal abortion. In conclusion, I basically oppose to abortion for human dignity, except special cases. Therefore the abortion may be morally permissible for the case of a woman'life is threatened by pregnancy and unavoidable abortion after rape, because nobody is morally required to sacrifice her life to keep another person life.
참고문헌 (38)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2000), 법문사
- 김성천, "형법각론" (2006), 동현출판사
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2007), 박영사
- 김철수, "헌법학개론" (1999), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)" (2008), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법각론(제7판)" (2010), 홍문사
- 오영근, "형법각론(제2판)" (2009), 박영사
- 진계호, "형법각론(제6판)" (2008), 대왕사
- 이재상, "형법각론(제5판)" (2004), 박영사
- 허 영, "한국헌법론" (2000), 박영사
- 김학태, "형법에서의 낙태죄와 모성보호", 외법논집, (3) (1996), 한국외국어대학교 법학연구소
- 김학태, "낙태에 관한 법이론적 담론과 법정책적 판단에 관한 연구", 외법논집, 33(3), pp.647~676 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김향미, "모자보건법 제14조 개정의 필요성과 방향", Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 52(5), pp.487~498 (2009), 대한산부인과학회
- 배종대, "낙태에 대한형법정책", 고려법학, (50), pp.229~265 (2008), 법학연구원
- 신동운, "형법개정과 관련하여 본 낙태죄 연구", 형사정책연구, 2(2) (1991)
- 양현아, "범죄에서 권리로: 재생산권으로서의 낙태권. in: ｢낙태죄에서 재생산으로｣ 서울대 BK21 법학연구단 공익인권법센터 기획" (2005), 사람생각
- 오상걸, "모자보건법(형법개정안 제135조)과 태아의 생명권", 변호사, (26) (1996)
- 오정진, "법에 나타난 낙태문제", 여성과 사회, (8) (1997)
- 윤종행, "낙태방지를 위한 입법론", 법학연구, 13(1), pp.171~198 (2003), 법학연구원
- 이선순, "재생산권으로서의 낙태에 관한 법여성학적 고찰", 여성학연구, 16(1) (2006)
- 이인영, "낙태죄 허용한계에 관한 규범해석과 사회인식도", 의료법학, 8(2) (2007)
- 임웅, "낙태죄의 비범죄화의 연구", 성균관법학, 17(2) (2005)
- 정현미, "낙태죄와 관련한 입법론", 형사법연구, 22(특집) (2004)
- 조홍석, "현행 모자보건법 제14조의 헌법상의 문제점과 개선방안. in: 법제 515" (2000), 법제처
- 지규철, "미국과 독일의 낙태판결에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 공법학연구, 9(1), pp.84~109 (2008), 한국비교공법학회
- 한상희, "사생활의 권리: 생활정치를 위한 비판적 수사ㆍ낙태사건을 중심으로", 공법연구, 26(1) (1998)
- 허 영, "공임신중절과 헌법", 공법연구, (5) (1977)
- 홍성방, "낙태와 헌법상의 기본가치", 서강법학연구 (2001), 서강대학교 법학연구소
- 홍완식, "국가의 기본권 보호의무와 낙태문제" (2003), 현대공법이론의 제 문제
- 보건복지부, "인공임신중절 실태조사 및 종합대책 수립" (2005)
- 보건복지부, "부적절한 인공임신중절수술 예방사업 개발 및 법적 정비방안 연구" (2007)
- Baruch Brody, "Against an Absolute Right to Abortion. in: Life and Death" (1999), wadsworth Publishing Company
- Dorothy Mcbride Steson, "Women's Movements Defence of Legal Abortion in Great Britain" (2001), Abortoin Politics
- John T. Noonan, Jr., "Abortion is wrong. in: Life and Death" (1999), Wadsworth Publishing Company
- Klein, H. H., "Die grundrechtliche Schutzpflicht" (1994), DVBI
- Laurence H., "Tribe, Abortion : The clash of Abosolutes" (1992), W. W. Nortion & Company
- Raimo Lathi, "인각생명의 법적보호", 형사법연구, (16) (2001)
- Quinn W, "Abortion : Identity and Loss", philosophy and Public Affairs, 13 (1984)