‘화법과 언어’의 통합 성취기준과 교과서 검토 - ‘어휘’를 중심으로 -
An Examination of the Integrated Achievement Standards and Textbooks in 'Speech and Language': Focusing on 'Vocabulary'
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the integrated achievement standard newly introduced in the general elective subject Speech and Language under the 2022 revised Korean language curriculum, focusing on the standard: “Select appropriate vocabulary and grammatical elements for the discourse context to express the speaker’s attitude.” Specifically, the analysis centers on the ‘vocabulary’ component, with an in-depth examination of three key aspects—‘speaker’s attitude,’ ‘vocabulary appropriate to the discourse purpose,’ and ‘vocabulary appropriateness’—across seven textbooks. The findings are as follows. First, the interpretation of ‘speaker’s attitude’ varies across textbooks, and there are cases in which it is used interchangeably with ‘speaker’s intention,’ suggesting a need for clarification and supplementation in the standard’s explanation. Second, it was pointed out that the lack of theoretical and empirical foundations regarding ‘vocabulary appropriate to the discourse purpose’ poses challenges for concretizing this concept as instructional content. Accordingly, the necessity of systematic research on vocabulary use by discourse purpose is emphasized. Third, the study argues that the concept of ‘vocabulary appropriateness’ should be expanded to include perspectives such as fairness, creativity, diversity and efficiency.
Abstract
This study examines the integrated achievement standard newly introduced in the general elective subject Speech and Language under the 2022 revised Korean language curriculum, focusing on the standard: “Select appropriate vocabulary and grammatical elements for the discourse context to express the speaker’s attitude.” Specifically, the analysis centers on the ‘vocabulary’ component, with an in-depth examination of three key aspects—‘speaker’s attitude,’ ‘vocabulary appropriate to the discourse purpose,’ and ‘vocabulary appropriateness’—across seven textbooks. The findings are as follows. First, the interpretation of ‘speaker’s attitude’ varies across textbooks, and there are cases in which it is used interchangeably with ‘speaker’s intention,’ suggesting a need for clarification and supplementation in the standard’s explanation. Second, it was pointed out that the lack of theoretical and empirical foundations regarding ‘vocabulary appropriate to the discourse purpose’ poses challenges for concretizing this concept as instructional content. Accordingly, the necessity of systematic research on vocabulary use by discourse purpose is emphasized. Third, the study argues that the concept of ‘vocabulary appropriateness’ should be expanded to include perspectives such as fairness, creativity, diversity and efficiency.
