본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

커뮤니티 의사결정 지원수법의 가능성과 과제에 관한 연구 - 제주시 원도심 유휴공간 재생 워크숍 방법론을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Possibilities and Conditions of Decision-Making Method for the Community - Focused on the Workshop Methodology for Regenerate Idle Space in Old Downtown Jeju -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류건축공학

초록

Recently, the role of community in public design has become important. However, the design process often places only emphasis on the ‘agreement’ of the community. As a result, the process was forced to collect opinions from the community only passively. Also, a process that only focuses on the formation of an agreement is likely to provoke confrontations and conflicts between those who support and oppose it. In the end, persuasion by the opposing residents is more important than decision-making by the whole community. Therefore, it has recently been paying attention to ‘decision-making’ that values a variety of things, not ‘agreement formation’. Because various values of the community are valued and process is more important than result, ‘decision-making’ is different from ‘agreement formation’. South Korea is also paying attention to public design, where community decision-making is central. Therefore, it is very necessary to develop a methodology that can support community decision making. In Jeju, the community's decision-making support methodology was devised for urban regeneration. The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of this methodology and to reveal its potential and challenge as a decision-supporting methodology.

Abstract

Recently, the role of community in public design has become important. However, the design process often places only emphasis on the ‘agreement’ of the community. As a result, the process was forced to collect opinions from the community only passively. Also, a process that only focuses on the formation of an agreement is likely to provoke confrontations and conflicts between those who support and oppose it. In the end, persuasion by the opposing residents is more important than decision-making by the whole community. Therefore, it has recently been paying attention to ‘decision-making’ that values a variety of things, not ‘agreement formation’. Because various values of the community are valued and process is more important than result, ‘decision-making’ is different from ‘agreement formation’. South Korea is also paying attention to public design, where community decision-making is central. Therefore, it is very necessary to develop a methodology that can support community decision making. In Jeju, the community's decision-making support methodology was devised for urban regeneration. The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of this methodology and to reveal its potential and challenge as a decision-supporting methodology.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Diana Leafe, C., "Creating a Life Together: Practical Tools to Grow Ecovillages and Intentional Communities" (2003), New Society of Publishers
  2. Sanoff, H., "Design games: Plating for keeps with personal and Environmental Design Decisions" (1993), William Kaufmann, Inc
  3. Sanoff, H., "Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning" (2000), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  4. 佐藤滋, "まちづくりデザインゲーム" (2008), 学芸出版社
  5. 佐藤滋, "まちづくりの科学" (1999), 鹿島出版会
  6. 高田光雄, "体験まちづくり学習" (2003), 学芸出版社
  7. 林泰義, "市民社会とまちづくり" (2000), ぎょうせい
  8. 廉喆浩, "分譲集合住宅の再生における区分所有者の意思決定支援に関する研究", 博士, pp.2006
  9. 이연숙, "주거지 정비지역 주민 워크샵을 통한 마을이미지 맵 제작도구의 효용성 연구", 한국주거학회논문집, 21(1), pp.67~77 (2010), 한국주거학회
  10. 김현숙, "도시설계 워크샵의 프로세스와 시각화기법에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회논문집, 22(2), pp.153~162 (2006), 대한건축학회
  11. "Urban Regeneration Information System(URIS)"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)