퇴직금 월할지급 약정의 효력과 관련 쟁점 - 대상판결 : 대법원 2010. 5. 20. 선고 2007다90760 판결 (전원합의체) -
Issues related to the agreements for the dividing monthly payment of severance
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper studies whether the payment system by dividing monthly as a severance has the effect under the circumstance of the spread of performance-based annual salary settlement. The result suggests that the effect of severance arrangements related to partial payments for the longevity of future pre-settlement agreement may not be effective, while previous to the longevity of the effect of a legal settlement shall be acceptable. Although the legal requirements were equipped with partial payments of the amounts corresponding to the retirement benefits for the future, the nature of benefits might be unjust enrichment that would be returned to the employer in terms of equity. Also it is necessary to accept that the offset nominal amounts paid severance to retirement benefits, because it, considerably, related to the severance pay claims. In this case, according to the Civil Enforcement, it is desirable to allow only offset over half of severance payment.
Abstract
This paper studies whether the payment system by dividing monthly as a severance has the effect under the circumstance of the spread of performance-based annual salary settlement. The result suggests that the effect of severance arrangements related to partial payments for the longevity of future pre-settlement agreement may not be effective, while previous to the longevity of the effect of a legal settlement shall be acceptable. Although the legal requirements were equipped with partial payments of the amounts corresponding to the retirement benefits for the future, the nature of benefits might be unjust enrichment that would be returned to the employer in terms of equity. Also it is necessary to accept that the offset nominal amounts paid severance to retirement benefits, because it, considerably, related to the severance pay claims. In this case, according to the Civil Enforcement, it is desirable to allow only offset over half of severance payment.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김형배, "｢노동법｣ 제19판" (2010), 박영사
- 박준서, "주석 민법(제3판), 채권각칙(5)" (2004), 한국사법행정학회
- 유성재, "판례노동법" (2008), 법문사
- 임종률, "노동법" (2006), 박영사
- 이병태, "최신노동법" (2007), 중앙경제사
- 하갑래, "근로기준법" (2008), 개정증보판 제19판
- 구태회, "월급에 포함하여 지급된 퇴직금의 효력, In 재판자료 제118집 : 노동법 실무연구" (2009), 법원도서관
- 권창영, "연봉제와 퇴직금" (2003), 인권과 정의
- 김성수, "사례를 통한 비전형적 퇴직금 제도의 고찰" (2003), 재판실무연구
- 김인재, "매월 지급받는 임금 속 퇴직금 명목 금원의 효력", 월간 노동법률 (2008), 중앙경제
- 김홍영, "월급에 포함된 퇴직금 지급의 효력 - 서울고등법원 2007. 11. 30. 선고 2006나86698 판결 판례 평석", 노동법연구, (24), pp.187~218 (2008), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 이승길, "연봉제의 노동법적 문제", 노동법연구, (11) (2001)
- 이용인, "무효인 퇴직금 중간정산과 부당이득 - 서울고등법원 2007. 11. 30. 선고, 2006나86698 판결 -", 민주법학, (36), pp.285~319 (2008), 민주주의법학연구회
- 이호철, "연봉제 하에서의 퇴직금 선지급의 법적 효력", 형평과 정의 (2007), 대구지방변호사회
- 임상민, "연봉제 하에서 월급에 포함된 퇴직금의 성격", 재판자료