Consequences of Political Diversity for Political Participation as a Communication Process
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Studies on the consequences of political diversity for political participation havefocused on either mobilizing or demobilizing influence. The purpose of this study isto understand the consequences of political diversity for political participation in theframework of models of communication process. It first identifies different models ofpolitical participation in existing research: the SES and social structural model, the socialnetwork model, and information processing model. It then evaluates the models ofparticipation within the communication process paradigm with a focus on the O-S-O-Rmodel. Attempting to locate political diversity and associated variables functionally inthe models of communication process, the study expounds on how existing studies’assumptions and conclusions shifted from passive audience (SES and pre-conditions) toactive audience (individual choices and information processing). Finally, it suggests thatthe consequences of political diversity for political participation be understood as acommunication process.Studies on the consequences of political diversity for political participation havefocused on either mobilizing or demobilizing influence. The purpose of this study isto understand the consequences of political diversity for political participation in theframework of models of communication process. It first identifies different models ofpolitical participation in existing research: the SES and social structural model, the socialnetwork model, and information processing model. It then evaluates the models ofparticipation within the communication process paradigm with a focus on the O-S-O-Rmodel. Attempting to locate political diversity and associated variables functionally inthe models of communication process, the study expounds on how existing studies’assumptions and conclusions shifted from passive audience (SES and pre-conditions) toactive audience (individual choices and information processing). Finally, it suggests thatthe consequences of political diversity for political participation be understood as acommunication process.
Abstract
Studies on the consequences of political diversity for political participation havefocused on either mobilizing or demobilizing influence. The purpose of this study isto understand the consequences of political diversity for political participation in theframework of models of communication process. It first identifies different models ofpolitical participation in existing research: the SES and social structural model, the socialnetwork model, and information processing model. It then evaluates the models ofparticipation within the communication process paradigm with a focus on the O-S-O-Rmodel. Attempting to locate political diversity and associated variables functionally inthe models of communication process, the study expounds on how existing studies’assumptions and conclusions shifted from passive audience (SES and pre-conditions) toactive audience (individual choices and information processing). Finally, it suggests thatthe consequences of political diversity for political participation be understood as acommunication process.
참고문헌 (34)
- Capella, J. N., "Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality : Electronic dialogue during campaign 2000", Political Communication, 19, pp.73~93 (2002)
- Blumler, J. G., "The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies", Communication Research, 6, pp.19~36 (1979)
- Burtler, D., "Political Change in Britain : The Evolution of Electoral Choice" (1974), St. Martin’s
- Cho, J., "Campaigns, reflection and deliberation : Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects", Communication Theory, 19(1), pp.66~88 (2009)
- Eveland, W. P. Jr., "The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news : Evidence from non-election, off-year election, and presidential election contexts", Communication Research, 28, pp.571~601 (2001)
- Eveland, W. P. Jr., "Political discussion frequency, network size and"heterogeneity"of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation", Journal of Communication, 59, pp.205~224 (2005)
- Eveland, W. P. Jr., "Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model : A panel study of motivations, information processing and learning during Campaign 2000", Communication Research, 30, pp.359~386 (2003)
- Gastil, J., "Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation", Political Communication, 16(1), pp.3~23 (1999)
- Großer, J., "Neighborhood information exchange and voter participation : An experimental study", American Political Science Review, 100, pp.235~248 (2006)
- Huckfeldt, R., "Political participation and the neighborhood social context", American Journal of Political Science, 23, pp.579~592 (1979)
- Huckfeldt, R., "Political environments, political dynamics, and the survival of disagreement", The Journal of Politics, 64(1), pp.1~21 (2002)
- Huckfeldt, R., "Political Disagreement : The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks" (2004), Cambridge University
- Jang, S., "Are diverse political networks always bad for participatory democracy? Indifference, alienation, and political disagreements", American Politics Research, 37(5), pp.879~898 (2009)
- Jung, N., "The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation", Mass Communication & Society, 14, pp.407~430 (2011)
- Kosicki, G. M., "Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies", ass Communication and Political Information Processing, pp.69~83 (1990)
- Kwak, N., "Talking politics and engaging politics : An examination of the interactive relations between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement", Communication Research, 32(1), pp.87~111 (2005)
- Leighley, J., "Social interaction and contextual influences on political participation", American Politics Quarterly, 18, pp.191~209 (1990)
- Markus, H., "The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed)", pp.137~230 (1985), Random House
- McClurg, S. D., "Political disagreement in context : The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement and political talk on electoral participation", Political Behavior, 28, pp.349~366 (2006)
- McClurg, S. D., "The electoral relevance of political talk : Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation", American Journal of Political Science, 50, pp.737~754 (2006)
- McLeod, J. M., "Media effects: Advances in theory and research", pp.123~162 (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Mutz, D. C., "Cross-cutting social networks : Testing democratic theory in practice", American Political Science Review, 96, pp.111~126 (2002)
- Mutz, D. C., "Hearing the Other Side : Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy" (2006), Cambridge University
- Noelle-Neumann, E., "The Spiral of Silence : Public Opinion—Our Social Kkin" (1986), University of Chicago
- Perse, E. M., "Involvement with local television news : Cognitive and emotional dimensions", Human Communication Research, 16, pp.556~581 (1990)
- Putnam, R. D., "Bowling alone : America’s declining social capital", Journal of Democracy, 6(1), pp.65~78 (1995)
- Scheufele, D. A., "Democracy based on difference : Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship", Journal of Communication, 56, pp.728~753 (2006)
- Scheufele, D. A., "Social structure and citizenship : Examining the impact of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation", Political Communication, 21, pp.315~338 (2004)
- Shah, D. V., "Campaign ads, online messaging and participation : Extending the communication mediation model", Journal of Communication, 57, pp.676~703 (2007)
- Stouffer, S. A., "Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties" (1955), Doubleday
- Ulbig, S. G., "Conflict avoidance and political participation", Political Behavior, 21, pp.265~282 (1999)
- Verba, S., "The big tilt: Participatory inequality in America", The American Prospect, 32, pp.74~80 (1997)
- Wolfinger, R. E., "Who votes?" (1980), New Haven
- Zipp, J. F., "The structure of electoral political participation", American Journal of Sociology, 85, pp.167~177 (1979)