A Basic Study on the New Creative Thinking Process: Modified from the KJ Method
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The KJ method, a creative thinking tool, can help establish order amidst chaos, with subjectivity playing both beneficial and detrimental roles. This study aimed to enhance the original KJ method and develop a new research approach by extracting key elements from research methods that could effectively optimize subjectivity and then integrating them with steps of the KJ method. The research process included a literature review to outline advantages and challenges of the KJ method with selection and analysis of three subjective research methods and their elements, ultimately culminating in a new five-step KJ method. This study emphasizes the critical role of subjectivity in creative thinking. It provides a theoretical foundation for optimizing the KJ method, thereby offering improved strategies to foster creative thinking.
Abstract
The KJ method, a creative thinking tool, can help establish order amidst chaos, with subjectivity playing both beneficial and detrimental roles. This study aimed to enhance the original KJ method and develop a new research approach by extracting key elements from research methods that could effectively optimize subjectivity and then integrating them with steps of the KJ method. The research process included a literature review to outline advantages and challenges of the KJ method with selection and analysis of three subjective research methods and their elements, ultimately culminating in a new five-step KJ method. This study emphasizes the critical role of subjectivity in creative thinking. It provides a theoretical foundation for optimizing the KJ method, thereby offering improved strategies to foster creative thinking.
참고문헌 (34)
- A. Peshkin, "In search of subjectivity-one's own", Educational researcher, 17(7), pp.17~21 (1988)[DOI]
- J. H. Gu, "Study on the New Subjective Creativity Thinking Process : In Case of KJ method", Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference, 2024(5), pp.265~266 (2024)
- E. P. Torrance, "Can We Teach Children to Think Creatively?", 6(2), pp.114~143 (1972)[DOI]
- E. Torrance, "The Nature of Creativity", pp.43~73 (1988), Cambridge University Press
- M. Basadur, "Training in creative problem solving : Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization", Organizational Behavior and human performance, 30(1), pp.41~70 (1982)[DOI]
- S. Paletz, "A social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation", Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, pp.73~95 (2010)[DOI]
- N. Hao, "Reflection enhances creativity : Beneficial effects of idea evaluation on idea generation", Brain and cognition, 103, pp.30~37 (2016)[DOI]
- S. Mizuno, "Management for quality improvement: the 7 new QC tools" (2020), Productivity press
- J. Kawakita, "Hasso Hou (Idea Generation Method)" (1967), Chuokoron-Shinsha, Inc
- J. Kawakita, "The original KJ method" (1982), Kawakita Research Institute
- J. Kawakita, "Zoku Hasso Hou (Idea Generation Method, Continued)" (1970), Chuokoron-Shinsha, Inc
- S. Kunifuji, "A Japanese Problem-Solving Approach: The KJ Ho Method", pp.165~170 (2016)[DOI]
- R. Scupin, "The KJ method : A technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology", Human organization, 56(2), pp.233~237 (1997)[DOI]
- S. H. Park, "Primary Study on Qualitative Service Design Method for the Improving for the 119 First Aid Stretcher", Industrial design (ID), 7(2), pp.1~8 (2013)
- S. Shapin, "The sciences of subjectivity. Social Studies of Science", 42(2), pp.170~184 (2012)[DOI]
- A. Lundberg, "What is subjectivity? Scholarly perspectives on the elephant in the room", Quality & Quantity, 57(5), pp.4509~4529 (2023)[DOI]
- W. Stephenson, "Q Methodology and the Subjectivity of Literature", Operant Subjectivity, 3(4) (1980)[DOI]
- B. McKeown, "Q methodology" (2013), SAGE Publications
- E. A. Albright, "Lessons learned: Some guidelines to factor interpretation", Operant Subjectivity, 41, pp.134~146 (2019)[DOI]
- M. Sandelowski, "Rigor or rigor mortis : The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited", Advances in nursing science, 16(2), pp.1~8 (1993)[DOI]
- A. Lundberg, "Using Q methodology : sorting out subjectivity in educational research", Educ. Res. Rev, 31, pp.100361~ (2020)[DOI]
- R. K. Merton, "The focused interview", American Journal of Sociology, 51, pp.541~557 (1946)[DOI]
- R. A. Kreuger, "Focus Group Kit" (1998), Sage
- F. Rabiee, "Focus-group interview and data analysis", Proceedings of the nutrition society, 63(4), pp.655~660 (2004)[DOI]
- I. Acocella, "The focus groups in social research : advantages and disadvantages", Quality & Quantity, 46, pp.1125~1136 (2012)[DOI]
- M. R. Roller, "Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach" (2015), Guilford Publications
- A. O’Cathain, "Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies", Bmj, 341 (2010)[DOI]
- M. D. Moon, "Triangulation: A method to increase validity, reliability, and legitimation in clinical research", Journal of emergency nursing, 45(1), pp.103~105 (2019)[DOI]
- D. S. Triangulation, "The use of triangulation in qualitative research", Oncol nurs forum, 41(5), pp.545~547 (2014)[DOI]
- A. Bryman, "Encyclopedia of social science research methods", Encycl. Soc. Sci. Res. Methods, 1143(1144) (2004)[DOI]
- M. Tory, "Evaluating visualizations: do expert reviews work?", IEEE computer graphics and applications, 25(5), pp.8~11 (2005)[DOI]
- J. L. Gabbard, "User-Centered Design and Evaluation of Virtual Environments", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19(6), pp.51~59 (1999)[DOI]
- C. D. Jackson, "Designer-Critiqued Comparison of 2D Vector Visualization Methods : A Pilot Study", Siggraph Sketch (2003)[DOI]
- J. Leeman, "Conducting mixed methods literature reviews: synthesizing the evidence needed to develop and implement complex social and health interventions", pp.167~184 (2015)[DOI]