관계문법에 의한 한국어 분석
A Study on Three Korean Constructions within Relational Grammar
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is an attempt to explore Korean double nominative, double accusative, and passive constructions within the framework of Relational Grammar. To give some background knowledge of Relational Grammar, I first introduce the notions such as grammatical relation, syntactic level and some relational laws. The main arguments of the present study are as follows: First, I classify Korean double nominative constructions into two different types: one resulting from the ‘Possessor Ascension Rule’ and the other bearing on the ‘Causative Clause Union’. Then I argue that only one of the two subjects is a real subject and the other is a cho element. Second, I also classify Korean double accusative constructions into two types. I prove that the first type of the construction results from the ‘3-2 Advancement’, and the second type bears the ‘Possessor Ascension’. As a result, I prove that only one object out of the two is a real object and the other is a cho. Finally, for the account of the Korean passive constructions, I formulate syntactic constraints on ‘-Ji Type’ and ‘-Hi Type’, respectively, as a parameter.
Abstract
This paper is an attempt to explore Korean double nominative, double accusative, and passive constructions within the framework of Relational Grammar. To give some background knowledge of Relational Grammar, I first introduce the notions such as grammatical relation, syntactic level and some relational laws. The main arguments of the present study are as follows: First, I classify Korean double nominative constructions into two different types: one resulting from the ‘Possessor Ascension Rule’ and the other bearing on the ‘Causative Clause Union’. Then I argue that only one of the two subjects is a real subject and the other is a cho element. Second, I also classify Korean double accusative constructions into two types. I prove that the first type of the construction results from the ‘3-2 Advancement’, and the second type bears the ‘Possessor Ascension’. As a result, I prove that only one object out of the two is a real object and the other is a cho. Finally, for the account of the Korean passive constructions, I formulate syntactic constraints on ‘-Ji Type’ and ‘-Hi Type’, respectively, as a parameter.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김귀화, "국어의 격연구", 박사, pp.1987
- 김영희, "한국어 통사론의 모색" (1988), 탑출판사
- 김일곤, "Advancement in Korean", 인문논총, 12, pp.161~183 (1986)
- 김일곤, "Korean Clause Structure", 박사, pp.1990
- 김일곤, "관계문법에 의한 한국어의 이중대격구문의 분석", 인문논총, 21, pp.151~171 (1991)
- 박현석, "이중목적어 구문에 관한 연구", 영어영문학 연구, 33, pp.241~256 (1992)
- 성광수, "국어 주어 및 목적어 중출 현상에 대하여", 문법연구, 1, pp.209~234 (1974)
- Chomsky, N., "Syntactic Structures" (1957), Mouton
- Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Perlmutter, D., "Lectures on Relational Grammar at Summer of the Linguistic Society Of America" (1974), U of Massachusetts
- Perlmutter, D., "Toward a Universal Characterization of Passivization", Perlmutter, pp.3~29 (1983)
- Perlmutter, D., "Some proposed Laws of Basic Clause Structure", Perlmutter, pp.30~80 (1983)
- Perlmutter, D., "The Relational Succession Law", Perlmutter, pp.81~128 (1983)
- Siewierska, A., "The Passive Comparative Linguistic Analysis" (1984), Croom Helm
- Shibatani, M., "Relational Grammar and Korean Syntax: The So-Called ‘Double- Subject’ and ‘Double Object’ Constructions Revisited", Language Research, 12(2) (1974), Seoul National University