Early functional outcomes after condylar-stabilizing (deep-dish) versus standard bearing surface for cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Aims: The primary study aim was to compare early knee-specific function of patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with either a cruciate-retaining (CR) polyethylene insert or a highly congruent condylarstabilizing (CS) insert. Secondary aims were to compare general health and satisfaction between the groups. Methods: A total of 418 consecutive primary TKAs were identified retrospectively. Demographics and preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prospectively. PROMs consisted of Oxford Knee Scores, EuroQol-5 Dimensions scores, and Short Form-12 scores. Results: A total of 54 (12.9%) patients received a CS insert and 364 patients received a CR TKA. The CS group had a significantly (odds ratio (OR) 2.9; p = 0.002) greater proportion of females (77.8% versus 54.9%). The only significant difference in postoperative PROMs was a higher Short Form-12 physical component score in the CR group (difference 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1 to 6.1; p = 0.04). Linear regression analysis demonstrated no significant difference for all postoperative PROMs (p > 0.25). There was no significant difference in satisfaction rate (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.42 to 2.12; p = 0.56) or pain visual analogue score (difference 6.1; 95% CI –1.9 to 14.0; p = 0.14) between the groups. Conclusion: More congruent CS inserts have equivalent PROMs and patient satisfaction at 1 year compared with less congruent CR inserts. These represent an option for surgeons undertaking TKA where increased congruency is desired.
Abstract
Aims: The primary study aim was to compare early knee-specific function of patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with either a cruciate-retaining (CR) polyethylene insert or a highly congruent condylarstabilizing (CS) insert. Secondary aims were to compare general health and satisfaction between the groups. Methods: A total of 418 consecutive primary TKAs were identified retrospectively. Demographics and preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prospectively. PROMs consisted of Oxford Knee Scores, EuroQol-5 Dimensions scores, and Short Form-12 scores. Results: A total of 54 (12.9%) patients received a CS insert and 364 patients received a CR TKA. The CS group had a significantly (odds ratio (OR) 2.9; p = 0.002) greater proportion of females (77.8% versus 54.9%). The only significant difference in postoperative PROMs was a higher Short Form-12 physical component score in the CR group (difference 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1 to 6.1; p = 0.04). Linear regression analysis demonstrated no significant difference for all postoperative PROMs (p > 0.25). There was no significant difference in satisfaction rate (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.42 to 2.12; p = 0.56) or pain visual analogue score (difference 6.1; 95% CI –1.9 to 14.0; p = 0.14) between the groups. Conclusion: More congruent CS inserts have equivalent PROMs and patient satisfaction at 1 year compared with less congruent CR inserts. These represent an option for surgeons undertaking TKA where increased congruency is desired.
참고문헌 (25)
- Mahoney OM, "Posterior cruciate function following total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study", J Arthroplasty, 9, pp.569~578 (1994)
- Ranawat AS, "Patellar crepitation in the P.F.C. sigma total knee system", Orthopedics, 29(9 suppl), pp.S68~S70 (2006)
- Mikulak SA, "Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg, 83(3), pp.398~403 (2001)
- Berend KR, "Which total knee replacement implant should I pick?", Bone Joint J, 95(11 Suppl A), pp.129~132 (2013)
- Dawson J, "Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(1), pp.63~69 (1998)
- Ware J Jr, "A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey:construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity", Med Care, 34, pp.220~233 (1996)
- Rabin R, "EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group", Ann Med, 33(5), pp.337~343 (2001)
- Harris K, "Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty", Patient Relat Outcome Meas, 7, pp.101~ (2016)
- Clement ND, "The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(8), pp.1933~1939 (2014)
- Bercik MJ, "Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis", J Arthroplasty, 28(3), pp.439~444 (2013)
- Li N, "Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(3), pp.556~564 (2014)
- Tanzer M, "Posterior-stabilized versus cruciateretaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap", J Arthroplasty, 17(7), pp.813~819 (2002)
- Beaupre LA, "A randomized clinical trial comparing posterior cruciate-stabilizing vs posterior cruciate-retaining prostheses in primary total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up", J Arthroplast, 32(3), pp.818~823 (2017)
- van Hamersveld K, "Implant fixation in cruciate-retaining compared with posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: seven-year follow-up of a randomised RSA trial", Bone Joint J, 99(SUPPL 1), pp.109~ (2017)
- Clark CR, "Posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a randomized study", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 392, pp.208~212 (2001)
- Emerson RH, "A comparison of 2 tibial inserts of different constraint for cruciate-retaining primary total knee arthroplasty: an additional tool for balancing the posterior cruciate ligament", J Arthroplast, 31(2), pp.425~428 (2016)
- Scott RD, "Posterior cruciate supplementing total knee replacement using conforming inserts and cruciate recession: effect on range of motion and radiolucent lines", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 309, pp.146~149 (1994)
- Hofmann AA, "Posterior stabilization in total knee arthroplasty with use of an ultracongruent polyethylene insert", J Arthroplast, 15(5), pp.576~583 (2000)
- Chaidez-Rosales PA, "Total knee arthroplasty with ultracongruent tibial insert. Two-year follow-up", Acta Ortop Mex, 25(1), pp.17~20 (2011)
- Feng EL, "Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (299), pp.60~71 (1994)
- Blunn GW, "Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties: a comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses", J Arthroplast, 12(3), pp.281~290 (1997)
- Peters CL, "Comparison of total knee arthroplasty with highly congruent anterior-stabilized bearings versus a cruciate-retaining design", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472(1), pp.175~180 (2014)
- Lützner J, "Similar stability and range of motion between cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting ultracongruent insert total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 23(6), pp.1638~1643 (2015)
- Song EK, "Total knee arthroplasty using ultra-congruent inserts can provide similar stability and function compared with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 25(11), pp.3530~3535 (2017)
- Maempel JF, "Range of movement correlates with the Oxford knee score after total knee replacement: a prediction model and validation", Knee, 23(3), pp.511~516 (2016)