Posterior condylar offset changes and its effect on clinical outcomes after posteriorsubstituting, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: anterior versus posterior referencing
4
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: We sought to determine whether there was a difference in the posterior condylar offset (PCO), posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) and clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with anterior referencing (AR) or posterior referencing (PR) systems. We also assessed whether the PCO and PCOR changes, as well as patient factors were related to range of motion (ROM) in each referencing system. Methods: This retrospective study included 130 consecutive patients (184 knees) with osteoarthritis who underwent primary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-substituting fixed-bearing TKA. The difference between preoperative and postoperative PCO and PCOR values were calculated. Clinical outcomes including ROM and Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) scores were evaluated. Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the factors related to postoperative ROM in each referencing system. Results: The postoperative PCO was greater in the AR group (28.4 mm) than in the PR group (27.4 mm), whereas the PCO was more consistently preserved in the PR group. The mean postoperative ROM after TKA was greater in the AR group (129°) than in the PR group (122°), whereas improvement in WOMAC score did not differ between the two groups. Preoperative ROM was the only factor related to postoperative ROM in both groups. Conclusions: There was no difference in postoperative PCO in AR and PR group and the PCO was not associated with postoperative ROM. PCO was more consistently preserved after surgery in the PR group. The postoperative PCO and PCOR changes did not affect the postoperative ROM. Furthermore, similar clinical outcomes were achieved in the AR and PR groups. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered (Trial registration number: 06-2010-110).
Abstract
Background: We sought to determine whether there was a difference in the posterior condylar offset (PCO), posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) and clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with anterior referencing (AR) or posterior referencing (PR) systems. We also assessed whether the PCO and PCOR changes, as well as patient factors were related to range of motion (ROM) in each referencing system. Methods: This retrospective study included 130 consecutive patients (184 knees) with osteoarthritis who underwent primary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-substituting fixed-bearing TKA. The difference between preoperative and postoperative PCO and PCOR values were calculated. Clinical outcomes including ROM and Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) scores were evaluated. Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the factors related to postoperative ROM in each referencing system. Results: The postoperative PCO was greater in the AR group (28.4 mm) than in the PR group (27.4 mm), whereas the PCO was more consistently preserved in the PR group. The mean postoperative ROM after TKA was greater in the AR group (129°) than in the PR group (122°), whereas improvement in WOMAC score did not differ between the two groups. Preoperative ROM was the only factor related to postoperative ROM in both groups. Conclusions: There was no difference in postoperative PCO in AR and PR group and the PCO was not associated with postoperative ROM. PCO was more consistently preserved after surgery in the PR group. The postoperative PCO and PCOR changes did not affect the postoperative ROM. Furthermore, similar clinical outcomes were achieved in the AR and PR groups. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered (Trial registration number: 06-2010-110).
참고문헌 (24)
- Laurent D. Angibaud, "Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of a Next Generation Computer-Assisted Surgical System", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 7(2), pp.1~9 (2015), 대한정형외과학회
- Incavo SJ, "Knee kinematics in genesis total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of different tibial designs with and without posterior cruciate substitution in cadaveric specimens", Am J Knee Surg, 10(4), pp.209~215 (1997)
- 이동현, "Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 29(2), pp.104~109 (2017), 대한슬관절학회
- 이주홍, "Risk of Anterior Femoral Notching in Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 7(2), pp.1~8 (2015), 대한정형외과학회
- Fokin AA, "Anterior referencing versus posterior referencing in total knee arthroplasty", J Knee Surg, 27(04), pp.303~308 (2014)
- Manson TT, "Sagittal plane balancing in the total knee arthroplasty", J Surg Orthop Adv, 18(2), pp.83~92 (2009)
- Almeida P, "The posterior condylar offset ratio and femoral anatomy in anterior versus posterior referencing total knee arthroplasty", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 101(6), pp.687~691 (2015)
- Bellemans J, "Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty : influence of posterior condylar offset", J Bone Joint Surg, 84(1), pp.50~53 (2002)
- Clement N, "Posterior condylar offset is an independent predictor of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty", Bone Joint Res, 6(3), pp.172~178 (2017)
- Goldstein WM, "Why posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting total knee replacements have similar ranges of motion : the importance of posterior condylar offset and cleanout of posterior condylar space", JBJS, 88, pp.182~188 (2006)
- Han H, "Changes in femoral posterior condylar offset and knee flexion after PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty : comparison of anterior and posterior referencing systems", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 24(8), pp.2483~2488 (2016)
- Hanratty B, "The influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after total knee replacement using a cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant", J Bone Joint Surg, 89(7), pp.915~918 (2007)
- Ishii Y, "Posterior condylar offset does not correlate with knee flexion after TKA", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(9), pp.2995~3001 (2013)
- Malviya A, "Predicting range of movement after knee replacement : the importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 17(5), pp.491~498 (2009)
- Massin P, "Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 21(6), pp.889~896 (2006)
- Zhang H, "Influence of posterior condylar offset and anteroposterior femorotibial translation on knee flexion after posterior cruciate-sacrificing self alignment bearing total knee arthroplasty", Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi, 25(1), pp.42~46 (2011)
- Kansara D, "The effect of posterior tibial slope on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 21(6), pp.809~813 (2006)
- Kurosaka M, "Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty : the need and the pitfalls", J Arthroplasty, 17(4), pp.59~62 (2002)
- 김종헌, "Effect of Posterior Femoral Condylar Offset and Posterior Tibial Slope on Maximal Flexion Angle of the Knee in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrificing Total Knee Arthroplasty", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 25(2), pp.54~59 (2013), 대한슬관절학회
- Soda Y, "New parameter of flexion after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty : posterior condylar offset ratio on X-ray photographs", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 127(3), pp.167~170 (2007)
- Li G, "The cartilage thickness distribution in the tibiofemoral joint and its correlation with cartilage-to-cartilage contact", Clin Biomech, 20(7), pp.736~744 (2005)
- Johal P, "The posterior condylar offset ratio", Knee, 19(6), pp.843~845 (2012)
- Kotani A, "Factors influencing range of motion after contemporary total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 20(7), pp.850~856 (2005)
- Debette C, "Total knee arthroplasty of the stiff knee : three hundred and four cases", Int Orthop, 38(2), pp.285~289 (2014)