본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Outcomes of the Different Types of Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Identical Femoral Geometry

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: There are controversies around the role of the posterior cruciate ligament and the effect of design modifications for high flexion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). So, we compared the clinical outcomes of the cruciate retaining (CR), posterior stabilized (PS), and high flexion posterior stabilized (F-PS) designs in TKA with identical femoral geometry. Materials and Methods: One hundred seventy nine knees with 3 different types of prostheses after a minimum 5-year follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study: 45 with CR, 40 with PS and 94 with F-PS. The mean ages of these groups were 65.7, 67.2, and 67.5, and the mean durations of follow-up were 8.1, 8.0, and 6.8 years, respectively. We compared the range of motion, functional outcomes, and radiographic measurements at the 2-year follow-up and last follow-up. Results: The maximal flexion angle was significantly lower in the CR group than the F-PS group at the 2-year follow-up. However, there was no significant difference at the last follow-up. Functional outcomes and survival rate of the three groups were similar at the last follow-up. Conclusions: Three different types of TKAs (CR, PS and F-PS) with identical femoral geometry showed similar mid-term outcomes with regard to the range of motion, functional outcomes and survival rate.

Abstract

Purpose: There are controversies around the role of the posterior cruciate ligament and the effect of design modifications for high flexion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). So, we compared the clinical outcomes of the cruciate retaining (CR), posterior stabilized (PS), and high flexion posterior stabilized (F-PS) designs in TKA with identical femoral geometry. Materials and Methods: One hundred seventy nine knees with 3 different types of prostheses after a minimum 5-year follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study: 45 with CR, 40 with PS and 94 with F-PS. The mean ages of these groups were 65.7, 67.2, and 67.5, and the mean durations of follow-up were 8.1, 8.0, and 6.8 years, respectively. We compared the range of motion, functional outcomes, and radiographic measurements at the 2-year follow-up and last follow-up. Results: The maximal flexion angle was significantly lower in the CR group than the F-PS group at the 2-year follow-up. However, there was no significant difference at the last follow-up. Functional outcomes and survival rate of the three groups were similar at the last follow-up. Conclusions: Three different types of TKAs (CR, PS and F-PS) with identical femoral geometry showed similar mid-term outcomes with regard to the range of motion, functional outcomes and survival rate.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Padua R, "Range of motion correlates with patient perception of TKA outcome", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 460, pp.174~177 (2007)
  2. Argenson JN, "Patient-reported outcome correlates with knee function after a single-design mobile-bearing TKA", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466, pp.2669~2676 (2008)
  3. Noble PC, "The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 452, pp.35~43 (2006)
  4. Maruyama S, "Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 19, pp.349~353 (2004)
  5. Harato K, "Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus-substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial", Knee, 15, pp.217~221 (2008)
  6. Weeden SH, "A randomized, prospective study of primary total knee components designed for increased flexion", J Arthroplasty, 22, pp.349~352 (2007)
  7. Huang HT, "The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up", J Arthroplasty, 20, pp.674~679 (2005)
  8. Nutton RW, "A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90, pp.37~42 (2008)
  9. Conditt MA, "The PCL significantly affects the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 19, pp.107~112 (2004)
  10. Victor J, "Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised outcome study", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87, pp.646~655 (2005)
  11. Fantozzi S, "Femoral rollback of cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements: in vivo fluoroscopic analysis during activities of daily living", J Orthop Res, 24, pp.2222~2229 (2006)
  12. Klein GR, "The effect of tibial polyethylene insert design on range of motion: evaluation of in vivo knee kinematics by a computerized navigation system during total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 19, pp.986~991 (2004)
  13. 김준식, "Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses", JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 87A, pp.1470~1475, JOURNAL BONE JOINT SURGERY INC
  14. Choi WC, "Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92, pp.2634~2642 (2010)
  15. McCalden RW, "A randomized controlled trial comparing “high-flex” vs “standard” posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.33~38 (2009)
  16. 최충혁, "표준형과 고도굴곡형 치환물을 이용한 후방십자인대 대치형 슬관절 전치환술의 술후 최대굴곡각 비교연구", 대한정형외과학회지, 44(6), pp.581~585 (2009), 대한정형외과학회
  17. Hirsch HS, "The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (309), pp.64~68 (1994)
  18. Yoshiya S, "In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions", J Arthroplasty, 20, pp.777~783 (2005)
  19. Tanzer M, "Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap", J Arthroplasty, 17, pp.813~819 (2002)
  20. Chaudhary R, "Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 90, pp.2579~2586 (2008)
  21. Bertin KC, "Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty at 5 to 7 years followup", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (436), pp.177~183 (2005)
  22. Nerhus TK, "Time-dependent improvement in functional outcome following LCS rotating platform knee replacement", Acta Orthop, 81, pp.727~732 (2010)
  23. Bin SI, "Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 15, pp.350~355 (2007)
  24. Seng C, "Improved clinical outcomes after high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a 5-year follow-up study", J Arthroplasty, 26, pp.1025~1030 (2011)
  25. Bellemans J, "Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 84, pp.50~53 (2002)
  26. Bellemans J, "The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 13, pp.193~196 (2005)
  27. Sierra RJ, "Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 23, pp.20~23 (2008)
  28. Abbas D, "Medium-term results of the Scorpio total knee replacement", Knee, 13, pp.307~311 (2006)
  29. Borrione F, "Scorpio single radius total knee arthroplasty. A minimal five-year follow-up multicentric study", Int Orthop, 35, pp.1777~1782 (2011)
  30. Rand JA, "Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85, pp.259~265 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

Evaluation of Postoperative Range of Motion and Functional Outcomes after Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized High-Flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty박관규, 양익환, 이우석, 한창동, 한창욱연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2012 · 제53권 제4호Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrificing Medial Pivot Knee: Minimum 5-year Follow-up Results염윤식, 이신호, 조성도, Hye-Yong Cho대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2014 · 제26권 제3호Effect of Posterior Femoral Condylar Offset and Posterior Tibial Slope on Maximal Flexion Angle of the Knee in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrificing Total Knee Arthroplasty김종헌대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2013 · 제25권 제2호Changes in Femoral Posterior Condylar Offset, Tibial Posterior Slope Angle, and Joint Line Height after Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty김강일, 배대경, 송상준, 정호연대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2016 · 제28권 제1호Mid-term Results of Single-Radius Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 5 Year Follow-up김광미, 전근철, 전철홍, 황재선대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2013 · 제25권 제4호Posterior condylar offset changes and its effect on clinical outcomes after posteriorsubstituting, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: anterior versus posterior referencing강승백, 이승아, 장문종, Chong Bum Chang, Do Hwan Han, Hyung Jun Park, Il-Ung Hwang, Jisu Park, Keummin Hwang, Sohee Oh대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2020 · 제32권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)