본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

구조조사 ‘地’의 사용 규칙에 관한 소고

A Study on the Rules for Using a Structural Particle ‘de(地)’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study examined the rules for using adverbs and the structural particle ‘de’ in modern Chinese. The Chinese language belongs to an isolating language, so the sentence component and the role within a sentence are decided by word order and position within the sentence instead of morphological markers, and an adverb also gets its role through the position between subject and predicate. However, not every type of adverb acquires its qualification as an adverb just for its ‘position’. In this case, it requires the use of the structural particle ‘de’. Under the hypothesis in which there must be differences between a component that would become an adverb just for being placed in the position, and a component that would become an adverb by combining with ‘de’, this study observed some example sentences in children’s novels that could reflect the current language phenomena and the rules for using ‘de’ explained in existing research. This study verified the rules for using ‘de’ with the ‘distance’ between components. For example, an adjective(phrase) taking up a great part of adverb showed a semantically close/distant relationship with the predicate; a verb(phrase) showed the simultaneity in the section occupied by the action of adverb and predicate in the time axis; and a noun showed the aspect of adding other components shown in proportion to the semantic distance. In other words, the ‘distance between components in proportion to close/distant relationship’ that could be explained as iconicity, is shown through the use of ‘de’.

Abstract

This study examined the rules for using adverbs and the structural particle ‘de’ in modern Chinese. The Chinese language belongs to an isolating language, so the sentence component and the role within a sentence are decided by word order and position within the sentence instead of morphological markers, and an adverb also gets its role through the position between subject and predicate. However, not every type of adverb acquires its qualification as an adverb just for its ‘position’. In this case, it requires the use of the structural particle ‘de’. Under the hypothesis in which there must be differences between a component that would become an adverb just for being placed in the position, and a component that would become an adverb by combining with ‘de’, this study observed some example sentences in children’s novels that could reflect the current language phenomena and the rules for using ‘de’ explained in existing research. This study verified the rules for using ‘de’ with the ‘distance’ between components. For example, an adjective(phrase) taking up a great part of adverb showed a semantically close/distant relationship with the predicate; a verb(phrase) showed the simultaneity in the section occupied by the action of adverb and predicate in the time axis; and a noun showed the aspect of adding other components shown in proportion to the semantic distance. In other words, the ‘distance between components in proportion to close/distant relationship’ that could be explained as iconicity, is shown through the use of ‘de’.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 신미경, "현대중국어 구조조사 ‘地’에 관한 한국인 학습자의 오류 분석", 중어중문학, (66), pp.183~200 (2016), 한국중어중문학회
  2. 艾彦, "形容词作状语的语义指向研究" (2005), 北京大学硕士论文
  3. 黄蓓佳, "平安夜" (2011), 海豚出版社
  4. 李劲荣, "内涵, 外延与汉语修饰成分的标记隐现", 对外汉语研究, 1, pp.166~179 (2010)
  5. 李小凤, "形容词重叠式状语后面“地”字使用的制约因素", 暨南大学华文学院学报, 3, pp.68~74 (2005)[DOI]
  6. 陆丙甫, "作为一条语言共性的“距离 - 标记对应律”", 中国语文, 1, pp.3~15 (2004)
  7. 吕叔湘, "신현대한어800사" (2003), 동양문고
  8. 裴辉强, "数量短语重叠式“一AA”与“一A一A”的异同", 合肥工业大学学报, 26(5), pp.71~75 (2012)
  9. 彭赏, "非范畴化与现代汉语中的“名词状语”", 外语教学, 29(6), pp.33~37 (2008)
  10. 孙德金, "现代汉语名词做状语考察", 语言教学与研究, 4, pp.88~98 (1995)
  11. 孙德金, "现代汉语动词做状语考察", 语言教学与研究, 3, pp.116~129 (1997)
  12. 张国宪, "谓词状语语义指向浅说", 汉语学习, 2, pp.13~16 (1991)
  13. 郑远汉, "从话语结构的制约看状语标记“地”的隐现", 汉语学报, 3, pp.65~72 (2005)
  14. 朱景松, "形容词重叠式的语法意义", 语文研究, 3, pp.9~17 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)