본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국어 “A+(de)+V”와 “V+(de)+A”의 통사적 특징 연구

An investigation of syntactic features of the structures A+(de)+V and V+(de)+A in modern Chinese Language

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper discussed the syntactic difference of the adjective used as an adverbial or complement in a sentence. The contrastive features of the using of the structures A+(de)+V and V+de+A are followings: The NP could be used after A+(de)+V quite freely, and sometimes the NP could be the prerequisite for the using of A+(de)+V, whereas the NP is seldom used after V+A, and the NP could not be used after V+de+A. The particle “zhe” could be used after A+de+V in which A is a single syllable adjective, and the particle “le” could not be used after it, whereas The particle “le” could be used after V+A in which A is a single syllable adjective, and the particle “zhe” could not be used after it. A+(de)+V could be used in the structure of “zai……(zhe)(ne)” with a present progressive tense, whereas V+A and V+de+A could not be used in it. A+V could be used in a LIANDONG sentence or a pivotal sentence, and V+de+A could not be used in a LIANDONG sentence, whereas A+V could not be used as an adverbial, and V+de+A could. A+(de)+V could be used as an object of some verbs “jueding”,”yuanyi”,”dasuan”,etc, whereas V+de+A could be used as an object of some verbs “renwei”,”yiwei”,”jinxing”,etc. A+(de)+V could be seldom used as a modifier, whereas V+de+A couldc be often used as a modifier.

Abstract

This paper discussed the syntactic difference of the adjective used as an adverbial or complement in a sentence. The contrastive features of the using of the structures A+(de)+V and V+de+A are followings: The NP could be used after A+(de)+V quite freely, and sometimes the NP could be the prerequisite for the using of A+(de)+V, whereas the NP is seldom used after V+A, and the NP could not be used after V+de+A. The particle “zhe” could be used after A+de+V in which A is a single syllable adjective, and the particle “le” could not be used after it, whereas The particle “le” could be used after V+A in which A is a single syllable adjective, and the particle “zhe” could not be used after it. A+(de)+V could be used in the structure of “zai……(zhe)(ne)” with a present progressive tense, whereas V+A and V+de+A could not be used in it. A+V could be used in a LIANDONG sentence or a pivotal sentence, and V+de+A could not be used in a LIANDONG sentence, whereas A+V could not be used as an adverbial, and V+de+A could. A+(de)+V could be used as an object of some verbs “jueding”,”yuanyi”,”dasuan”,etc, whereas V+de+A could be used as an object of some verbs “renwei”,”yiwei”,”jinxing”,etc. A+(de)+V could be seldom used as a modifier, whereas V+de+A couldc be often used as a modifier.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 고영근, "표준국어문법론" (1990), 탑출판사
  2. 오문의, "현대중국어 형용사 연구" (1994), 서울대학교대학원
  3. 北京?言?院?言???究所, "?代?????究?料" (1992), 北京?言?院出版社
  4. 郭?, "?代?????究" (2002), 商?印??
  5. 胡明?, "「北京?形容?的再分?」,『北京?初探』, 商?印??, 1987", ~ (1987)
  6. ???, "“多+V”和“V+多”", 言究
  7. ??, "????考察 in: 性?形容?句法成分功能??分析" (1996), ?言?院出版社
  8. ?丹?, "???先?是?用?先-???法??系建??想』,?文?究,第二期,1995", ~ (1995)
  9. ?月?, "?用?代???法" (2001), 商?印??
  10. "????明,「形容?作?果??情?考察1、2、3」,『????』,第1、4、6期, 1997.", ~
  11. ??安, "??的????和??形式" (1990), 上海外??育出版社
  12. 山田留里子, "「?音?形容?作??的情?考察」,『世界????』, 第3期, 1995", ~ (1995)
  13. 王亦?, "「?代??形容?句法特征?究?述」,『社科??』, 第2期, 2000.", ~ (2000)
  14. "??政, 「“形容?+‘点’”的信息功能???取?」,『世界????』, 第4期, 1999.", ~
  15. 袁毓林, "?代??祈使句?究" (1993), 北京大?出版社
  16. ??德 孟?海, "??形容?用法?典" (2003), 商?印??
  17. 朱德熙, "?法??" (2000), 商?印??
  18. 朱德熙, "「?代??形容??究」,『?代???法?究』, 商?印??, 2000", ~ (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)