형사조정제도의 바람직한 시행을 위한 범죄피해자보호법 개선안
The Improvement of Crime Victim Protection Act to Conduct Desirably the Criminal Mediation
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To regulate the existing criminal mediation in Crime Victim Protection Act is encouraging. In the past the criminal mediation was enforced without a legal basis. The basis is first specified in the Act in 2010. But the Act need to be improved because of several defects of it. First, there is the problem of the criminal mediation agency and mediatior. Someone argue that the mediation agency does not take a neutral attitude. I think that the mediation should carried out in the victim support center as in the past, because the impact of prosecution on the mediation is huge. Someone also argue that mediators are not specialist and not fit to be a criminal mediators. Therefore the training for qualification improvement is needed. Second, the case should be remitted to the mediation by victim and offender's autonomous application as their participation should be guaranteed. Third, the condition for mediation should be improved. The madiator, victim and offender should have enough time to mediate the case. Forth,the modification of terms is needed, because the victim is not included in the "Party" of the criminal procedure. Therefore the term, "Party" should be changed for "Victim and Offender". Ultimately the regulation of criminal mediation should be stated in the Criminal Procedure Code. The criminal mediation is the institution in the criminal procedure. Therefore the legal basis of criminal mediation also should eventually exist in the Criminal Procedure Code as Crime Victim Protection Act.
Abstract
To regulate the existing criminal mediation in Crime Victim Protection Act is encouraging. In the past the criminal mediation was enforced without a legal basis. The basis is first specified in the Act in 2010. But the Act need to be improved because of several defects of it. First, there is the problem of the criminal mediation agency and mediatior. Someone argue that the mediation agency does not take a neutral attitude. I think that the mediation should carried out in the victim support center as in the past, because the impact of prosecution on the mediation is huge. Someone also argue that mediators are not specialist and not fit to be a criminal mediators. Therefore the training for qualification improvement is needed. Second, the case should be remitted to the mediation by victim and offender's autonomous application as their participation should be guaranteed. Third, the condition for mediation should be improved. The madiator, victim and offender should have enough time to mediate the case. Forth,the modification of terms is needed, because the victim is not included in the "Party" of the criminal procedure. Therefore the term, "Party" should be changed for "Victim and Offender". Ultimately the regulation of criminal mediation should be stated in the Criminal Procedure Code. The criminal mediation is the institution in the criminal procedure. Therefore the legal basis of criminal mediation also should eventually exist in the Criminal Procedure Code as Crime Victim Protection Act.
참고문헌 (36)
- 강우예, "형사상 조정제도의 목적에 따른 분류와 그 절차적 함의 -미국의 논의를 중심으로-", 피해자학연구, 17(1), pp.103~126 (2009), 한국피해자학회
- 김동림, "형벌의 목적과 한계", 강원법학, 11 (1999), 강원대학교 법학연구소
- 김성돈, "회복적 사법형 형사조정제도의 법제화 방안*", 성균관법학, 21(2), pp.261~305 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김성진, "회복적 사법에서 형사조정의 의미", 중앙법학, 11(3), pp.213~239 (2009), 중앙법학회
- 김용세, "회복적 사법과 형사화해 : 형사화해 알선지침" (2009), 진원사
- 김용욱, "한국의 형사조정: 회복적사법 프로그램인가?", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.205~229 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김재중, "청주지역 화해사례를 통해 본 범죄피해자-가해자 화해제도의 발전방향", 피해자학연구, 15(1), pp.111~140 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 김창렬, "독일의 가해자-피해자-조정제도", 법학연구, 18(1), pp.41~69 (2010), 법학연구소
- 가해자-피해자-조정: 범죄대처의 새로운 가능성과 행위자와 피해자에 대한 기회, "독일연방법무부", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2002)
- 박광민, "범죄피해자 보호지원제도의 실태와 연계강화방안", 피해자학연구, 17(1), pp.5~32 (2009), 한국피해자학회
- 박상식, "형사화해ㆍ조정의 필요성", 법학연구, 17(2), pp.87~109 (2009), 법학연구소
- 박정성, "형사절차상 피해자－가해자의 조정제도", 법학논총, 26(2), pp.53~78 (2009), 법학연구소
- 송길룡, "형사조정제도개관 및 시행매뉴얼", ~ (2007)
- 신동운, "소년선도보호제도의 장래-비교법적 고찰을 중심으로-", 청소년범죄연구, 4 (1986)
- 정승환, "신형사소송법" (2008), 홍문사
- 신동운, "형법총론" (2008), 법문사
- 심재무, "형사화해제도의 도입과 문제점", 경성법학, 14(2) (2005), 경성대학교 법학연구소
- 오경식, "현행 형사소송법에 나타난 범죄피해자 보호정책에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 17(1), pp.127~144 (2009), 한국피해자학회
- 유엔 형사사법 핸드북 회복적 사법 프로그램, "윤옥경", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2009)
- 윤용규, "형벌의 목적과 실현에 관한 소고", 강원법학, 5 (1993), 강원대학교 법학연구소
- 이동원, "형사조정프로그램과 조정위원의 역할", 형사정책연구, 20(1), pp.1019~1044 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이동원, "형사조정프로그램의 이상적인 모델구성과 적용방안", 한국공안행정학회보, 19(1), pp.139~169 (2010), 한국공안행정학회
- 이백철, "회복적 사법: 대안적 형벌체제로서의 관련성에 관한 연구", 한국공안행정학회보, (13), pp.137~172 (2002), 한국공안행정학회
- 이상돈, "형사사법의 세 가지 지층과 피해자의 지위", 피해자학연구, 17(1), pp.33~55 (2009), 한국피해자학회
- 이용식, "형법에 대한 헌법적 통제-비례성 원칙을 중심으로-", 한국형사법학회 2005년 동계학술회의-주제: 헌법질서와 형법의 방향- (2005), 한국형사법학회
- 형사화해제도 도입에 적합한 입법방식, "이원상", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2009)
- 이진국, "범죄피해자와 회복적 사법", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.359~380 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 이진국, "회복적 사법의 관점에서 본 형사조정실무의 문제점", 형사정책연구, 19(1), pp.5~31 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이호중, "한국의 형사사법과 회복적 사법-과거, 현재, 그리고 미래", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.297~334 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 최영승, "현행 형사화해제도의 실태와 문제점", 피해자학연구, 15(1), pp.69~92 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 하태훈, "형사법의 갈등조정 및 예방기능, 범죄피해자 보호·지원(법무부 형사조정위원 갈등관리교육)", 법무부 인권국, ~ (2008)
- Marshall, T, "Criminal Mediation in Great Britain 1980-1996", European Jouranl on Criminal Policy and Research (1996)
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, "Handbook on Restorative Justice Programme :Ciminal Justice Handbook Series" (2006), United Nations
- Mark S. Umbreit, "Excutive Summary Victim Offender Mediation : An Analysis of Programs Four States of the U.S", ~ (1992)
- Jennifer Gerarda Brown, "The Use of Mediation to Resolve Criminal Cases:A Procedural Critique", Emory Law Journal, 43 (1994)
- Austin Sarat, "Victims and Victims' Rights" (1999), Chelsea House Publishers