디지털 시대의 중재 혁신: AI 기술의 활용과 도전
Innovating Arbitration in the Digital Age: Uses and Challenges of AI Technology
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines guidelines and progressive approaches for using emerging technologies, particularly generative Artificial Intelligence, in arbitration by reviewing research papers and reports from institutions such as the Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center (SVAMC), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), and the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC). These institutions have pursued various strategies, including establishing or amending regulations, to embrace new technologies. Notably, the SVAMC has aimed to advance through interaction with legal frameworks, thereby contributing to preserving the flexibility of the arbitration system while enhancing cooperation among institutions. However, the introduction of generative AI faces significant limitations, including a lack of cultural awareness, distrust of new technologies, and the potential for errors. These concerns stem from fears that decisions made by generative AI could be inaccurate and beyond the control of the parties involved. To address these limitations, this paper presents three solutions to make the benefits of technology adoption more tangible. Ensuring transparency in AI decision-making, respecting community values, and developing human-friendly technologies are projected to lay the foundation for a successful coexistence between generative AI and humans. Furthermore, this paper suggests an innovative perspective at the convergence of law and technology. Future research could focus on analyzing real cases of AI-based arbitration or developing a more detailed roadmap through in-depth discussions on the legal binding force of AI arbitration outcomes.
Abstract
This paper examines guidelines and progressive approaches for using emerging technologies, particularly generative Artificial Intelligence, in arbitration by reviewing research papers and reports from institutions such as the Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center (SVAMC), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), and the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC). These institutions have pursued various strategies, including establishing or amending regulations, to embrace new technologies. Notably, the SVAMC has aimed to advance through interaction with legal frameworks, thereby contributing to preserving the flexibility of the arbitration system while enhancing cooperation among institutions. However, the introduction of generative AI faces significant limitations, including a lack of cultural awareness, distrust of new technologies, and the potential for errors. These concerns stem from fears that decisions made by generative AI could be inaccurate and beyond the control of the parties involved. To address these limitations, this paper presents three solutions to make the benefits of technology adoption more tangible. Ensuring transparency in AI decision-making, respecting community values, and developing human-friendly technologies are projected to lay the foundation for a successful coexistence between generative AI and humans. Furthermore, this paper suggests an innovative perspective at the convergence of law and technology. Future research could focus on analyzing real cases of AI-based arbitration or developing a more detailed roadmap through in-depth discussions on the legal binding force of AI arbitration outcomes.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김용일, "COVID-19가 국제중재에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 융합정보논문지, 11(12) (2021), 중소기업융합학회
- 김장호, "생성형 AI를 활용한 무역서신 작성에 관한 연구", e-비즈니스연구, 24(7) (2023), 국제e-비즈니스학회
- 남기연, "문화콘텐츠관련 분쟁 유형과 중재제도의 활용 가능성", 선진상사법률연구, (80) (2017), 법무부
- 배재권, "설명가능한 인공지능(XAI)방법론의 산업별 적용가능성에 관한 연구", 글로벌경영학회지, 20(2) (2023), 글로벌경영학회
- 오원석, "ICC仲裁에서 仲裁法院의 仲裁判定'檢討'(Scrutiny)制度에 관한 硏究", 무역학회지, 32(1) (2007), 한국무역학회
- 오원석, "國際商事仲裁에서 仲裁機關선택시 고려사항 : ICC, LCIA 및 AAA를 중심으로", 무역학회지, 31(1) (2006), 한국무역학회
- 이규호, "중재인의 임시적 처분 및 이에 대한 법원 역할의 비교법적 분석", 국제사법연구, 23(1) (2017), 한국국제사법학회
- 이민영, "로봇심판 적용에 대한 야구팬의 인식: 인간-로봇 심판 상호작용 관점에서", 체육과학연구 (2022), 한국스포츠정책과학원
- 이호원, "국제상사분쟁해결방법으로서의 국제중재에 관하여-실무적 절차의 흐름과 장단점을 중심으로-", 법학연구, 27(3) (2017), 연세대학교 법학연구원
- 이호형, "4차 산업혁명 관련 무역연구의 체계적 문헌고찰과 사례연구", 통상정보연구, 22(2) (2020), 한국통상정보학회
- 주요 각국의 중재기관의 독립성과 재정적 지원에 관한 법규 및 운영 실태에 관한 연구, "장문철", 법무부, ~ (2016)
- 장성봉, "개인정보 보호를 고려한 딥러닝 데이터 자동 생성 방안 연구", JCCT, 10(1) (2024), 국제문화기술진흥원
- 장재옥, "인공지능의 법적 지위에 관한 논의-전자인(간)과 관련하여-", 법학논문집, 43(1) (2019), 중앙대학교 법학연구원
- 정영수, "인공지능에 기반한 중재의 가능성에 관한 소고", 민사소송, 25(3) (2021), 한국민사소송법학회
- 인공지능 및 데이터 법안’의 주요 내용과 시사점, 디지털 법제 Brief, "채은선", 한국지능정보사회진흥원, ~ (2022)
- "Can Arbitrators Promote Settlement in Arbitration?" (2024)[URL]
- "Artificial Intelligence ‘AI’ In International Arbitration: Machine Arbitration" (2021)[URL]
- D. Mistry, "Privacy-Preserving On-Screen Activity Tracking and Classification in E-Learning Using Federated Learning", IEEE, pp.1~6 (2023)
- "Justice in the Digital Age: Exploring AI’s Role in International Arbitration" (2024)[URL]
- Elizabeth Chan, "Something Borrowed, Something Blue : The Best of Both Worlds in Metaverse-Related Disputes", Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, pp.205~209 (2022)
- "AI in International Arbitration: Reforming Justice" (2024)[URL]
- "광저우 인민정부"[URL]
- "광저우 중재위원회"[URL]
- "중국 법무부"[URL]
- "포브스"[URL]
- "ArbiLex"[URL]
- "China Daily"[URL]
- "International Bar Association"[URL]
- "KIM&CHANG"[URL]
- "KUSCO"[URL]
- "SCC"[URL]
- "SVAMC"[URL]