특수임무수행자 보상제도의 법적 문제점
Legal Problems of Compensation System for Special Mission Executors
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Republic of Korea enacted the Law on Compensation for Special Mission Executors(hereafter referred to as the CSME Law) in January 2004 for the first time in its history. This is quite meaningful in that the country officially recognized its instruction of and engagement with special mission on the government level, and moreover it expressed proactive will to repay special mission executors' sacrifice, devotion and tears in a small quantity. But the CSME Law brought about many problems in the process of its enforcement. For example, the lower norm, namely Enforcement Decree of the CSME Law impaires the spirit of thehigher law or ends in question of equity by unduly limiting the sphere of its application. Further, the CSME Law discriminates compensation between officers and enlisted men in relation to education and drill for special mission. Now it is proper to pursue revising the existing CSME Law as soon as possible in order to solve the diverse problems raised up to now. In addition, the Korean government should afford as much protection and assistance as possible to the men who executed special mission similar to that of intelligence corps and notwithstanding the fact were excluded from the compensation system under the CSME Law. For this, itshouldpositively consider enacting new special law on special mission concerning compensation for non-intelligence unit members.
Abstract
The Republic of Korea enacted the Law on Compensation for Special Mission Executors(hereafter referred to as the CSME Law) in January 2004 for the first time in its history. This is quite meaningful in that the country officially recognized its instruction of and engagement with special mission on the government level, and moreover it expressed proactive will to repay special mission executors' sacrifice, devotion and tears in a small quantity. But the CSME Law brought about many problems in the process of its enforcement. For example, the lower norm, namely Enforcement Decree of the CSME Law impaires the spirit of thehigher law or ends in question of equity by unduly limiting the sphere of its application. Further, the CSME Law discriminates compensation between officers and enlisted men in relation to education and drill for special mission. Now it is proper to pursue revising the existing CSME Law as soon as possible in order to solve the diverse problems raised up to now. In addition, the Korean government should afford as much protection and assistance as possible to the men who executed special mission similar to that of intelligence corps and notwithstanding the fact were excluded from the compensation system under the CSME Law. For this, itshouldpositively consider enacting new special law on special mission concerning compensation for non-intelligence unit members.
참고문헌 (14)
- 강석승, "특수임무수행자 유족에 대한 예우", 인간안보학회논총, 2(2) (2009)
- 강창국, "대한민국 특수임무수행자 유족 보상제도에 관한 연구", 한국보훈논총, 7(2) (2008)
- 국가인권위원회 전원위원회, "북파공작원 관련 특별법 제정 권고", ~ (2003)
- 국가인권위원회, "“외국군 소속 한국인 북파공작원에게도 보상의무 있다 -외국군소속 특수임무수행자에 대한 국가보상을 위한 ｢특수임무수행자보상법｣ 의 제 ․ 개정 권고-,” 보도자료, 2007년 4월 12일", ~ (2007)
- 국방부 군사편찬연구소, "한국전쟁의 유격전사" (2003), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
- "“군, 북파공작원 6083명에 6884억 피해보상,” 동아일보, 2013년 5월 27일자", ~
- 특수임무수행자 보상에 관한 법률 일부개정법률안【김종태의원 대표발의】, "【김형태의원 대표발의】", 【김광진의원 대표발의】, 국회 국방위원회 수석전문위원, pp.2013, ~
- 오일환, "특수임무수행자 보상제도의 현황과 문제점", 한국보훈논총, 3(2) (2004)
- 오일환, "특수임무 수행자 보상심의 위원회의 설치배경과 활동 및 과제", 한국보훈논총, 12(3), pp.129~151 (2013), 한국보훈학회
- 유영옥, "국가보훈학" (2005), 홍익재
- 인간안보학회, , 인간안보학회논총, 2(1) (2009)
- 전광석, "국가유공자보상에 대한 헌법적 보호의 가능성", 헌법학연구, 6(4) (2000)
- 특수임무수행자보상지원단, "특수임무수행자보상심의위원회", ~ (2010)
- 특수임무 수행해도 미군소속이면 보상 못 받아 외,” 법률신문, 2013년 3월 28일자,