전투경찰제도의 문제점과 개선방안
The Drawbacks and Remedies of Combat Police System
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This dissertation was written in an effort to draw the defects of combat police system through consideration on the Combat Police Unit Installation Act of 1970 as well as the Military Service Law and other applicable regulations and to present their reasonable remedies in the lawful perspective. The first problem the system suggests is that it puts applicants into serving their military service through and by forceful assignment, notwithstanding the fact that not any of its parts relates to the obligatory military service. The service at combat police unit has been mostly dependant on transfers from active-duty soldiers. The remedies relevant to the current situation provided hereafter are alternative military service by volunteering and reinforcement of manpower subject to open recruitment of police constables. The second problem on the line of duty is that its scope of duty being excessively wide and ambiguous. The law regulates it to be “counterespionage operation and assistance on tasks for the sake of public order”, so it obstructs setting up of its limits of duty. Indeed, it constitutes another problem the combat police being dispatched on protest riot suppression, hence it proves the uses of the unit system does not comply with its regulations as described. The related measure on behalf of its improvement suggested is to regulate their duty as to be “dispersing illegal assemblies and demonstrations and protecting peaceful assemblies and demonstrations”. Thirdly, although the combat police characterizes itself as the keeper of public order, and yet it operates no different from the military. Currently, the personnel designated to be combat police apply to be active-duty soldiers, complete the military training, and then get transferred as combat police. The remedy here is to train them as police as of the date their training commences. The fourth and other revisions to be made that were pointed out are the abolishment of physical detention and confinement in the guardhouse. In the case of desertion from the military, the detention must consider fairness, and handling disobedience, the measure taken better accords with the nature of police as long as it is through detention system, not through punishment.
Abstract
This dissertation was written in an effort to draw the defects of combat police system through consideration on the Combat Police Unit Installation Act of 1970 as well as the Military Service Law and other applicable regulations and to present their reasonable remedies in the lawful perspective. The first problem the system suggests is that it puts applicants into serving their military service through and by forceful assignment, notwithstanding the fact that not any of its parts relates to the obligatory military service. The service at combat police unit has been mostly dependant on transfers from active-duty soldiers. The remedies relevant to the current situation provided hereafter are alternative military service by volunteering and reinforcement of manpower subject to open recruitment of police constables. The second problem on the line of duty is that its scope of duty being excessively wide and ambiguous. The law regulates it to be “counterespionage operation and assistance on tasks for the sake of public order”, so it obstructs setting up of its limits of duty. Indeed, it constitutes another problem the combat police being dispatched on protest riot suppression, hence it proves the uses of the unit system does not comply with its regulations as described. The related measure on behalf of its improvement suggested is to regulate their duty as to be “dispersing illegal assemblies and demonstrations and protecting peaceful assemblies and demonstrations”. Thirdly, although the combat police characterizes itself as the keeper of public order, and yet it operates no different from the military. Currently, the personnel designated to be combat police apply to be active-duty soldiers, complete the military training, and then get transferred as combat police. The remedy here is to train them as police as of the date their training commences. The fourth and other revisions to be made that were pointed out are the abolishment of physical detention and confinement in the guardhouse. In the case of desertion from the military, the detention must consider fairness, and handling disobedience, the measure taken better accords with the nature of police as long as it is through detention system, not through punishment.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김동희, "행정법Ⅱ" (2006), 박영사
- 박균성, "행정법론(하)" (2009), 박영사
- 성공회대학교 인권평화연구센터, "군대 내 인권상황 실태조사 및 개선방안연구" (2006), 국가인권위원회
- 정하중, "행정법개론" (2009), 법문사
- 최성보, "영창제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 홍정선, "행정법원론(하)" (2007), 박영사
- 이강언, "군사용어사전" (2009), 양서각
- 강경근, "전경의 헌법상 지위", 법률신문, (2337) (1994), 법률신문사
- 김상균, "전투경찰제도의 운영실태와 개선방안에 대한 연구", 법학연구, (19), pp.69~91 (2005), 한국법학회
- 김상균, "전의경의 폭력경험에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (21), pp.393~412 (2006), 한국법학회
- 송기춘, "전투경찰제도 폐지론", 민주법학, (30), pp.133~163 (2006), 민주주의법학연구회
- 오규철, "전, 의경 의문사의 발생원인 분석: 심리", 정신의학적 요인과 상황적 요인을 중심으로, 2009, pp.5(2), 123~148[DOI]
- 李桂洙, "한국의 군사법과 치안법― 군사와 치안의 착종(錯綜)과 민군관계의 전도(顚倒) ―", 공법연구, 31(4), pp.12~12 (2003), 한국공법학회
- 최정학, "군영창제도의 법적 문제점", 공익과 인권, 1(1) (2004), 서울대학교 공익인권법센터
- 최창동, "전투경찰제 개혁하고 위수령 폐기해야", 말, (146) (1998), 월간 말
