독점규제법상 특수관계인과의 기업결합에 대한 규제 가능성 검토
A Studies On The Regulations Of The Fusion With Special Related Persons In Monopoly Regulations Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
특수관계인과의 기업결합에 대한 경쟁제한성 심사는 다른 일반적 기업결합에 대한 심사방식이 마찬가지로 적용될 것이다. 다만 특수관계인과의 기업결합에서 결합 당사자들이 이미 동일한 기업집단에 속하고 있는 경우에, 수평적 결합의 측면에서 볼 경우에 시장점유율의 변화는 실질적으로 없는 것이므로, 당해 기업결합의 경쟁제한성이 인정되기 어렵다는 독일에서의 논의는 참고할 만한 것이다. 한편 논의 과정에서 예로 다루었던 KT와 KTF의 기업결합의 경우 통신산업의 특성이 반영되어야 하며, 특히 융합 환경 하에서 구조 개편에 따른 효율성 증대 효과에 대한 분석은 항변사유로서 고려될 수 있을 것이다.
Abstract
The special related persons mean that he has some relations with the concerned party of the fusions, mainly based upon the controls of business. Because the concerned party and the special related persons have already some relations based on control of business, it could be in doubt that the fusions of them could be corresponded with the essencial points, the creation of single business control of the fusions in Monopoly Regulations Act. But it is possible to take account of such a fusion, between the concerned party and the special related persons, as the fusions in Monopoly Regulations Act, as Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen in Germany has described. Korean Fair Trade Commission has treated this type of the fusions with the simplified review process. This process assumes the non-existance of competition restraints, but such assumptions could not exclude a review of competition restraints by Korean Fair Trade Commission. If the commission may carry out the review of competition restraints, it could evaluate the fusions as to horizontal, vertical and mixed one. Specially if the commission evaluate the horizontal fusions and the parties of the fusions exist in same business group, it could not be easy to acknowledge the competition restraints of the fusions, because the total market shares of these parties may not be varied. And as to mixed fusions, the possibility of the transfer of market dominant power by bundling under the convergence circumstance and the effect of the efficiency by bundling must be investigated together.
참고문헌 (14)
- 권오승, "경제법" (2009), 법문사
- 김도연, "컨버전스 시대 통신 사업자의 변화 in : 디지털 컨버전스" (2004), 커뮤 니케이션 북스
- 신현윤, "경제법" (2006), 법문사
- 양명조, "경제법강의" (2008), 신조사
- 이기수, "경제법" (2006), 세창출판사
- 이민호, "기업결합에서의 경쟁제한성 판단 기준", 경쟁법연구, 13 (2006)
- 정호열, "경제법" (2008), 박영사
- 홍명수, "시장획정 방식의 개선과 과제", 법과사회, (29), pp.241~273 (2005), 법과사회이론학회
- Kling, M, "Kartellrecht" (2007), Verlag Franz Vahlen
- Lange, K. W, "Handbuch zum deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht", Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft, ~ (2006)
- Rittner, F, "Europäisches und deutsches Wirtschaftsrecht" (2008), C. F. Müller
- Williamson,O.E, "Antitrust Lenses and the Uses of Transaction Cost Economics Reasoning in Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness" (1992), Oxford Univ. Press
- Knut Werner Lange, "Handbuch zum deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht", Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft, 595~596 (2006)
- Oliver E. Williamson, "Antitrust Lenses and the Uses of Transaction Cost Economics Reasoning in: Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness", pp.140~ (1992), Oxford Univ. Press