본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

新羅와 唐의 敎育體制 비교 -中央官學을 중심으로-

A Comparison of the Educational System for Shilla and Tang Dynasty -Government-run Schools as a Central-

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Shilla Education can be divided into the Hwarangdo(花郞道) Education and the Kookhak Education two stages in accordance with Before and after the unification. The Hwarangdo Education is a Special education form in Shilla, and a Important way of Personnel training and The official selection. But in Shilla’s reunification Historical back ground in Seventh century, The Hwarangdo Education was can not To meet the requirements of the times. In order to better training and selection of personnel, Shilla needed for a new education system in realy, so taked Guozijian(國子監, Imperial Academy) of Tang Dynasty for reference, set up native educational institutions---Kook-hak(국학, National School). Shilla’s kookhak was imitated the Tang Dynasty system In many aspect, such as Institutional settings, Official organization, Course arrangement and The students of management. The focus of The contents of Education was focus on Confucian classicsin(儒學經典) in Shilla’s National School, teaching material was derive from china, Selective absorption and used within the select key, not was completely copy In essence. According to the actual situation, Choose Five classics(五經), not Nine classics(九經) as Tang dynasty in the Choose of materials. And Shilla’s National School was attached importance to WenXuan(文選, Selections of Refined Literature). In order to select talents, Shilla’s National School has established the Dokseosampumgwa(讀書三品科), granted an official qualification to National students by way of examination. There was similarity with gwageo of china. But the fundamental nature of Dokseosampumgwa was not gwageo(科擧制) from the object of test, examination content and the test method. Therefore we can say the educational system of Shilla has imitated to China In general and surface, but still retained Shilla’s identity. (Kyungpook National University/ liu_zhanfeng@hotmail.com)

Abstract

Shilla Education can be divided into the Hwarangdo(花郞道) Education and the Kookhak Education two stages in accordance with Before and after the unification. The Hwarangdo Education is a Special education form in Shilla, and a Important way of Personnel training and The official selection. But in Shilla’s reunification Historical back ground in Seventh century, The Hwarangdo Education was can not To meet the requirements of the times. In order to better training and selection of personnel, Shilla needed for a new education system in realy, so taked Guozijian(國子監, Imperial Academy) of Tang Dynasty for reference, set up native educational institutions---Kook-hak(국학, National School). Shilla’s kookhak was imitated the Tang Dynasty system In many aspect, such as Institutional settings, Official organization, Course arrangement and The students of management. The focus of The contents of Education was focus on Confucian classicsin(儒學經典) in Shilla’s National School, teaching material was derive from china, Selective absorption and used within the select key, not was completely copy In essence. According to the actual situation, Choose Five classics(五經), not Nine classics(九經) as Tang dynasty in the Choose of materials. And Shilla’s National School was attached importance to WenXuan(文選, Selections of Refined Literature). In order to select talents, Shilla’s National School has established the Dokseosampumgwa(讀書三品科), granted an official qualification to National students by way of examination. There was similarity with gwageo of china. But the fundamental nature of Dokseosampumgwa was not gwageo(科擧制) from the object of test, examination content and the test method. Therefore we can say the educational system of Shilla has imitated to China In general and surface, but still retained Shilla’s identity. (Kyungpook National University/ liu_zhanfeng@hotmail.com)

참고문헌 (45)

  1. "唐會要", ~
  2. "令集解", ~
  3. "禮記", ~
  4. "孟子", ~
  5. "文獻通考", ~
  6. "三國史記", ~
  7. "說文解字", ~
  8. "新唐書", ~
  9. "通典", ~
  10. 高慶錫, "新羅 官人 選拔制度의 變化", 歷史와 現實, (23) (1997), 23
  11. 高明士, "東亞教育圈形成史論" (2003), 上海古籍出版社
  12. 高明士, "天下秩序與文化圈的探索(以東亞古代的政治與敎育爲中心)" (2008), 上海古籍出版社
  13. 고명사, "天下秩序與文化圈的探索", pp.268~271 (2008), 上海古籍出版社
  14. 高明士, "韓國教育史研究" (1995), 大明出版社
  15. 權悳永, "筆寫本『花郞世紀』의 史料檢討", 歷史學報, (123) (1989)
  16. 김영하, "新羅 中代의 儒學受容과 支配倫理", 한국고대사연구, (40), pp.137~180 (2005), 한국고대사학회
  17. 金昌鎬, "文武王碑에 보이는 新羅人의 祖上認識", 韓國史硏究, (53), pp.19~53 (1986)
  18. 金羲滿, "新羅 國學의 成立과 運營, In 素軒 南都泳博士 古稀紀念 歷史學論叢" (1993), 민족문화사
  19. 盧重國, "新羅와 高句麗ㆍ百濟의 人材養成과 選拔", 新羅文化祭學術發表會論文集, 통권 : 19 (1998)
  20. 盧泰敦, "筆寫本『花郞世紀』的史料價値", 歷史學報, (147) (1995)
  21. 陸德明, "經典釋文序", ~
  22. 陸遊, "老學庵筆記", ~
  23. 末松保和, "壬申誓記石, 新羅史 諸問題", ~ (1954)
  24. 木村 誠, "統一新羅󰑘 官僚制", 日本古代史講座, (6) (1982)
  25. 文武王陵碑, "譯註 韓國古代金石文Ⅱ" (1992), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
  26. 朴淳敎, "眞德王代 政治改革과 金春秋의 集權過程", 淸溪史學, (13), pp.129~130 (1997)
  27. 新羅文化宣揚會, "花郞文化의 再照明", 新羅文化祭學術發表會論文集, 통권 : 10 (1989)
  28. 李基東, "新羅 骨品制 社會와 花郞徒" (1984), 一潮閣
  29. 李基白, "新羅 骨品體制下의 儒敎的 政治理念, In 新羅思想史硏究" (1986), 一潮閣
  30. 李基白, "新羅 思想史硏究" (1986), 一潮閣
  31. 李道學, "新羅 花郞徒의 起源과 展開過程", 13, (1)통권 : 38 (1990)
  32. 李明植, "新羅 國學의 運營과 再編", 대구사학, (59) (2000)
  33. 이병도, "壬申誓記石에 과하여", 한국고대사연구 (1976)
  34. 李泳鎬, "新羅文武王碑의 再檢討", 歷史敎育集, 8, pp.52~ (1986)
  35. 이인철, "新羅政治制度史硏究" (1993), 一志社
  36. 李喜寬, "新羅 中代의 國學과 國學生 -『三國史記』 38 國學條 學生關係規定의 再檢討", 신라문화제 학술발표회 논문집, 통권 : 19 (1998)
  37. 田美姬, "신라 景文王⋅憲康王대의 能官人 登用政策과 국학", 東亞硏究, (17) (1989)
  38. 鄭雲龍, "新羅 花郞制의 成立과 人才 選拔", 新羅文化祭學術發表會論文集, 통권 : 19 (1998)
  39. 정호섭, "新羅의 國學과 學生祿邑", 史叢, (58) (2004)
  40. 朱甫暾, "新羅 花郞徒 硏究의 現況과 課題", 啓明史學, (8) (1997)
  41. 지배선, "한국과 중국의 교육제도-삼국통일 이전을 중심으로", 學生生活硏究 (1989)
  42. 崔光植, "花郞硏究의 成果, In 花郞文化의 新硏究" (1995), 文德社
  43. 崔在錫, "新羅의 花郞과 花郞集團", 民族文化論叢, (8) (1987)
  44. 洪起子, "新羅下代讀書三品科", 新羅文化祭學術發表會論文集 (1998)
  45. 洪淳昶, "新羅 花郞道 硏究史의 考察", 新羅伽倻文化, (2) (1970)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)