Finite element study on the effect of abutment length and material on implant bone interface against dynamic loading
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
PURPOSE. Finite element study on the effect of abutment length and material on implant bone interface against dynamic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two dimensional finite element models of cylinderical implant, abutments and bone made by titanium or polyoxymethylene were simulated with the aid of Marc/Mentat software. Each model represented bone, implant and titanium or polyoxymethylene abutment. Model 1: Implant with 3 mm titanium abutment, Model 2: Implant with 2 mm polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment, Model 3: Implant with 3 mm polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment and Model 4: Implant with 4 mm polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment. A vertical load of 11 N was applied with a frequency of 2 cycles/sec. The stress distribution pattern and displacement at the junction of cortical bone and implant was recorded. RESULTS. When Model 2, 3 and 4 are compared with Model 1, they showed narrowing of stress distribution pattern in the cortical bone as the height of the polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment increases. Model 2, 3 and 4 showed slightly less but similar displacement when compared to Model 1. CONCLUSION. Within the limitation of this study, we conclude that introduction of different height resilient material abutment with different heights i.e. 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm polyoxymethylene, does not bring about significant change in stress distribution pattern and displacement as compared to 3 mm Ti abutment. Clinically, with the application of resilient material abutment there is no significant change in stress distribution around implant-bone interface.
Abstract
PURPOSE. Finite element study on the effect of abutment length and material on implant bone interface against dynamic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two dimensional finite element models of cylinderical implant, abutments and bone made by titanium or polyoxymethylene were simulated with the aid of Marc/Mentat software. Each model represented bone, implant and titanium or polyoxymethylene abutment. Model 1: Implant with 3 mm titanium abutment, Model 2: Implant with 2 mm polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment, Model 3: Implant with 3 mm polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment and Model 4: Implant with 4 mm polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment. A vertical load of 11 N was applied with a frequency of 2 cycles/sec. The stress distribution pattern and displacement at the junction of cortical bone and implant was recorded. RESULTS. When Model 2, 3 and 4 are compared with Model 1, they showed narrowing of stress distribution pattern in the cortical bone as the height of the polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment increases. Model 2, 3 and 4 showed slightly less but similar displacement when compared to Model 1. CONCLUSION. Within the limitation of this study, we conclude that introduction of different height resilient material abutment with different heights i.e. 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm polyoxymethylene, does not bring about significant change in stress distribution pattern and displacement as compared to 3 mm Ti abutment. Clinically, with the application of resilient material abutment there is no significant change in stress distribution around implant-bone interface.
참고문헌 (12)
- Kirsch A, "The IMZ endosseous two phase implant system: a complete oral rehabilitation treatment concept", J Oral Implantol, 12, pp.576~589 (1986)
- Babbush CA, "Intramobile cylinder (IMZ) two-stage osteointegrated implant system with the intramobile element (IME): part I. Its ratinale and procedure for use", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2, pp.203~216 (1987)
- Achour T, "Stress distribution in dental implant with elastomeric stress barrier", Mater Design, 32, pp.282~290 (2011)
- Holmes DC, "Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.450~458 (1992)
- McGlumphy EA, "A comparison of the stress transfer characteristics of a dental implant with a rigid or a resilient internal element", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.586~593 (1989)
- van Rossen IP, "Stressabsorbing elements in dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.198~205 (1990)
- Sato M, "Stresstransfer characteristics of stress-absorbing elements in the IMZ implant system: Part 1. Stress around a freestanding single implant under static loading conditions", J Jpn Prosthodont Soc, 36, pp.1102~1110 (1992)
- Haganman CR, "Deflection and stress distribution in three different IMZ abutment designs", J Prosthodont, 6, pp.110~121 (1997)
- Morton D, "Evaluation of resilient abutment components on measured strain using dynamic loading conditions", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.46~51 (1998)
- Skalak R, "Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.843~848 (1983)
- Geng JP, "Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.585~598 (2001)
- Oh TJ, "The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science", J Periodontol, 73, pp.322~333 (2002)