본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Biomechanical stress and microgap analysis of bone-level and tissuelevel implant abutment structure according to the five different directions of occlusal loads

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. The stress distribution and microgap formation on an implant abutment structure was evaluated to determine the relationship between the direction of the load and the stress value. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two types of three-dimensional models for the mandibular first molar were designed: bone-level implant and tissue-level implant. Each group consisted of an implant, surrounding bone, abutment, screw, and crown. Static finite element analysis was simulated through 200 N of occlusal load and preload at five different load directions: 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60°. The von Mises stress of the abutment and implant was evaluated. Microgap formation on the implant-abutment interface was also analyzed. RESULTS. The stress values in the implant were as follows: 525, 322, 561, 778, and 1150 MPa in a bone level implant, and 254, 182, 259, 364, and 436 MPa in a tissue level implant at a load direction of 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60°, respectively. For microgap formation between the implant and abutment interface, three to seven-micron gaps were observed in the bone level implant under a load at 45 and 60°. In contrast, a three-micron gap was observed in the tissue level implant under a load at only 60°. CONCLUSION. The mean stress of bone-level implant showed 2.2 times higher than that of tissue-level implant. When considering the loading point of occlusal surface and the direction of load, higher stress was noted when the vector was from the center of rotation in the implant prostheses.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The stress distribution and microgap formation on an implant abutment structure was evaluated to determine the relationship between the direction of the load and the stress value. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two types of three-dimensional models for the mandibular first molar were designed: bone-level implant and tissue-level implant. Each group consisted of an implant, surrounding bone, abutment, screw, and crown. Static finite element analysis was simulated through 200 N of occlusal load and preload at five different load directions: 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60°. The von Mises stress of the abutment and implant was evaluated. Microgap formation on the implant-abutment interface was also analyzed. RESULTS. The stress values in the implant were as follows: 525, 322, 561, 778, and 1150 MPa in a bone level implant, and 254, 182, 259, 364, and 436 MPa in a tissue level implant at a load direction of 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60°, respectively. For microgap formation between the implant and abutment interface, three to seven-micron gaps were observed in the bone level implant under a load at 45 and 60°. In contrast, a three-micron gap was observed in the tissue level implant under a load at only 60°. CONCLUSION. The mean stress of bone-level implant showed 2.2 times higher than that of tissue-level implant. When considering the loading point of occlusal surface and the direction of load, higher stress was noted when the vector was from the center of rotation in the implant prostheses.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Tolstunov L, "Implant zones of the jaws : implant location and related success rate", J Oral Implantol, 33, pp.211~220 (2007)
  2. Kandasamy B, "Long-term retrospective study based on implant success rate in patients with risk factor : 15-year follow-up", J Contemp Dent Pract, 19, pp.90~93 (2018)
  3. Carinci F, "Survival and success rate of one-piece implant inserted in molar sites", Dent Res J(Isfahan), 9, pp.S155~S159 (2012)
  4. Romeo E, "Systematic review of the survival rate and the biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of fixed dental prostheses with cantilevers on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean of 5 years follow-up", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.39~49 (2012)
  5. Pjetursson BE, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses(FDPs)after a mean observation period of at least 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.22~38 (2012)
  6. Jung RE, "Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.2~21 (2012)
  7. Lee H, "A Method for minimizing rotational errors of implant prostheses", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 32, pp.1018~1022 (2017)
  8. Lee H, "Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.659~670 (2019)
  9. Hasan I, "Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implant", Biomed Tech(Berl), 55, pp.341~350 (2010)
  10. Paek J, "Comparative analysis of screw loosening with prefabricated abutments and customized CAD", CAM abutments, 2016, pp.25, 770~774
  11. 이현종, "Effects of cementless fixation of implant prosthesis: A finite element study", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 11(6), pp.341~349 (2019), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  12. 유진숙, "Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar", clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length, 2017, pp.9(3), 143~151[DOI]
  13. Ebadian B, "Stress analysis of mandibular implant-retained overdenture with independent attachment system : effect of restoration space and attachment height", Gen Dent, 63, pp.61~67 (2015)
  14. Nissan J, "The effect of crown", implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations, 2011, pp.69, 1934~1939
  15. Anitua E, "Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.682~689 (2014)
  16. Araki H, "Three-dimensional finite element analysis of extra short implants focusing on implant designs and materials", Int J Implant Dent, 6, pp.5~ (2020)
  17. Watanabe F, "Finite element analysis of the influence of implant inclination, loading position, and load direction on stress distribution", Odontology, 91, pp.31~36 (2003)
  18. Weinberg LA, "The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.19~31 (1993)
  19. 문세영, "Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(1), pp.31~37 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  20. Adolfi D, "Torque maintenance capacity, vertical misfit, load to failure, and stress concentration of zirconia restorations cemented or notched to titanium bases", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 35, pp.357~365 (2020)
  21. Bulaqi HA, "Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone : A finite element analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 113, pp.548~557 (2015)
  22. Chang HS, "Stress distribution of two commercial dental implant systems : A three-dimensional finite element analysis", J Dent Sci, 8, pp.261~271 (2013)
  23. Alkan I, "Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws", J Prosthet Dent, 91, pp.319~325 (2004)
  24. Jörn D, "Influence of lubricant on screw preload and stresses in a finite element model for a dental implant", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.340~348 (2014)
  25. Zipprich H, "Effects of screw configuration on the preload force of implant-abutment screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 33, pp.e25~e32 (2018)
  26. Wu T, "Design of a custom angled abutment for dental implants using computer-aided design and nonlinear finite element analysis", J Biomech, 43, pp.1941~1946 (2010)
  27. Faverani LP, "The influence of bone quality on the biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses", Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 37, pp.164~170 (2014)
  28. Hirata R, "Mechanical evaluation of two grades of titanium used in implant dentistry", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 30, pp.800~805 (2015)
  29. 양홍서, "Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 10(3), pp.184~190 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  30. Zipprich H, "The micromechanical behavior of implant-abutment connections under a dynamic load protocol", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 20, pp.814~823 (2018)
  31. Zipprich H, "A new experimental design for bacterial microleakage investigation at the implant-abutment interface : An in vitro study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 31, pp.37~44 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant권호범, 김명주, 문세영, 임영준대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제1호Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an in vitro experiment and finite element analysisKazuhiko Yamamoto, Kazuhiro Murakami, Sadami Tsutsumi, Satoshi Horita, Tadaaki Kirita, Tsutomu Sugiura대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2017 · 제47권 제4호Effects of cementless fixation of implant prosthesis: A finite element study권긍록, 노건우, 박소연, 이현종대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2019 · 제11권 제6호Three dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution around the mandibular posterior implant during non-working movement according to the amount of cantilever김명래, 김선종, 김현주, 박은진, 박지만대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2014 · 제6권 제5호An evaluation of the stress effect of different occlusion concepts on hybrid abutment and implant supported monolithic zirconia fixed prosthesis: A finite element analysisAli Riza Tuncdemir, Nilgün Gulbahce Yesilyurt대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2021 · 제13권 제4호A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis박찬진, 송호용, 조리라, 허윤혁대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2016 · 제8권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)