互文理论视域下的理雅各与高本汉《尚书》译本比较研究
A Comparative Study on the Renditions of Shangshu by James Legge and Bernhard Karlgren from the Perspective of Intertextuality
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
《尚书》是中国“政书之祖，史书之源”，具有极为重要的思想文化价值，也是最早被译介到西方的中国经典之一，其中著名的英译本即包括19世纪英国传教士汉学家理雅各与20世纪瑞典汉学家高本汉的《尚书》译本。这两种英译相隔近一个世纪，产生于不同的历史语境，两位译者所参考的互文本存在历史性差异，他们对互文本的选择、吸收及转化具有主体性差异，这些皆是这两种英译对《尚书》的诠释与传译存在差异的重要原因。从互文理论的视角对其进行比较研究，不仅可以进一步拓展《尚书》英译的研究，深入把握西方《尚书》英译的发展特征与规律，也可为中国典籍的翻译与传播、翻译教学、汉学等研究提供有益的参考与启示。
Abstract
Shangshu is known as the “ancestor of political books and the source of historical books” in China, with extremely important ideological and cultural values. It is also one of the earliest Chinese classics translated by the Westerners. Since the 17th century, its translation has been popular, and famous English translations include the translations by the 19th-century British missionary Sinologist James Legge and the 20th-century Swedish sinologist Bernhard Karlgren. Due to the intertextuality of the text, examining the relevant intertextual materials referred to by James Legge and Bernhard Karlgren in the English translation process of the book reveals that the intertextual materials chosen by the two have different historical characteristics, and their absorption and transformation of intertextual materials have subjective differences. This is also one of the important reasons for their different translations and interpretations of the original text. Studying and interpreting the differences between these two English translations from the perspective of intertextual theory can not only further expand the research space of the translation of Shangshu, but also deeply grasp the development characteristics and laws of the English translation of this classic. It can also provide reference for the translation of Chinese classics, Sinology, translation teaching, and other research.
참고문헌 (26)
- 蔡沈, "四库全书 58册" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 戴密微, "法国汉学研究史概述", 汉学研究, 1 (1996), 中国和平出版社
- 葛厚伟, "基于语料库的《尚书》英译本词汇特征研究", 青海师范大学学报, (6) (2016)
- 黄念然, "当代西方文论中的互文理论", 外国文学研究, (1) (1999)
- 江灏, "今古文尚书全译" (2008), 贵州人民出版社
- 陆振慧, "古代典籍如何译？—比较三个<尚书>译本引发的思考", 翻译论坛, (3) (2015)
- 林风, "<尚书>四译本比较研究", pp.2012
- 钱宗武解读, "尚书" (2017), 国家图书馆出版社
- 秦海鹰, "互文性理论的缘起与流变", 外国文学评论, (3) (2004)
- 阮元校刻, "十三经注疏" (1980), 中华书局出版
- 王瑾, "互文性" (2005), 广西师范大学出版社
- 王韬, "送西儒理雅各回国序" (2002), 上海书店出版社
- 许钧, "翻译动机, 翻译观念与翻译活动", 外语研究, (1) (2004)
- 岳峰, "架设东西方的桥梁" (2004), 福建人民出版社
- 张上冠, "理雅各 (James Legge) 以意逆志的< 诗经> 翻译", pp.1997
- 朱莉娅, "互文性理论对结构主义的继承与突破", 当代修辞学, (5) (2013)
- 朱莉娅, "互文性理论与文本运用", 当代修辞学, (5) (2014)
- 伍雨晴, "译者主体性视域下<尚书>两英译本比较研究", 硕士, pp.2020
- 毛耀辉, "跨文化传播与接受：19世纪以来<尚书>在英语世界的译介研究", 博士, pp.2022
- Bernhard Karlgren, "Glosses on the Kuo feng Odes", Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, (14) (1942)
- Bernhard Karlgren, "Glosses on the Book of Documents", Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, (20)
- Bernhard Karlgren, "The Book of Documents", Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, (22) (1950)
- Helen Edith Legge, "Missionary and scholar" (1905), The Religious Tract Society
- James Legge, "The Shoo King.The Chinese Classics, with a translation, critical and exegetical notes, prolegomena, and copious indexes volume Ⅲ" (1991), SMC Publishing Inc
- James Legge, "The Chinese Classics Vol.5" (1939), Oxford University Press
- A. Brookes, "The General History of China. Containing a Geographical, Historical, Chronological, Political and Phyfical Defcription of the Empire of Chinese Tartary, Corea and Thibet. Including an Exact and Particular-Account of their Customs, Manners, Ceremonies, Religion, Arts and Sciences. The whole adorn'd with Curious Maps, and Variety of Copper Plates. Done from the French of P. Duhalde. Volume 2 of 4 volumes", J.Watts